You have more on the table with 447rwhp... what was the DA. Good run either way without much weight reduction... Good thing you got that .99... an 11.00 woulda been a tease.
__________________ 99 T/A Under the knife 10.9x or bust-
85 MM mas,Ram Air,Lid,Ported Fast 92/92,Fast Rails
12 bolt 3.73's,TSP 233/239,Hooker 1.75 LT's,ORY,LM1 !Egr,!Air,160 Thermo,Yank PT4000,SVO 38LB injectors. Flt Stage 5, 4' Alum DS. BMR Trakpak, LCA's,Relo brakets,Dragbar,Panhard,Subframe's, Custom loop. QA1's in all 4. 300# fronts. ARP everything,Rings,Bearings,Lifters,11:1 compression.
Old setup -11.539@ 118.82 1.649 60' 1969 z28 - 406SBC 9.77 @ 135.8 (1.413 60')
You have more on the table with 447rwhp... what was the DA. Good run either way without much weight reduction... Good thing you got that .99... an 11.00 woulda been a tease.
The air temp was some where in the mid 50's and about 30% humdity.. I think the car has a good 10.90 or better pass in her.. But I would have to change the tranny and go to a manual valve body. If you watch the video there is way to much time between the 2-3 gear shifts.. The 1-2 shifts are right on par though..
10.99. lol just sqeeked in! lol but its still a 10
Not bad for a full weight stock bottom end car right? Car weighs 3600lbs with me in it!! It would run mid to low 10's if I was as light as your mustang!!
for promising us big boobs and not delivering. Thats wrong in every way, kinda like driving a honda.[/quote]
