Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > VEHICLE SPECIFIC FORUMS > 2010 Camaro
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

2010 Camaro
Discuss the 5th generation Camaro
Sponsored by
School of Automotive Machinists
Click Here

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-16-2009, 05:09 AM   #1
Launching!
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: League City, Tx
Posts: 280
Default 2010 V6 Camaro vs LS1 camaro

So do you guys think the new V6 camaro will run close to the numbers of the old LS1 cars in the 1/4 mile. The new V6 has 304 HP, and the LS1 i think was around 320....sounds pretty close...anyone run one of the new v6's at the track?

Just thought I would spark a debate
__________________
07 Corvette Coupe, Lemans Blue, Z06 Wide body kit, wheels, tires, brakes. Magnaflow mufflers, Z06 Manifolds/Hpipe, Fast 92MM Intake, MTI Excelerator CAI, 3.90 Gears. 400RWHP, 400 RWTQ, best ET..11.73@121MPH (crappy 1.88 60' time)


06' C6 Corvette Coupe, Black on Black, Z51 Package, M6, Magnaflow Mufflers, MTI Tune 370 RWHP, 365 RWTQ, best time 12.02@115
12.235@115.58 (stock time)(gone but not forgotten)
06C6FVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 05:37 AM   #2
Moderator
 
BizZzatch350's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 16
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 8,168
Send a message via AIM to BizZzatch350
Default

No, the V8 5th gens are running near what the stock LS1s did, in good air they may go a bit faster. Your not taking in to acount the weight difference between the 4th gen and 5th gen.
BizZzatch350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 07:07 AM   #3
Launching!
 
WarShrike's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 205
Default

V6 is actually putting out around 260 or so to the wheels. Torque is what makes up for the whole thing.

Many races are decided within the first 60' and if you are near the same peak output as your opponent, both equally capable drivers and you are lacking the torque that they may have, you're pretty much getting a good view of their taillights.
__________________
2000 Firebird A4
●Whisper Lid●60*Inc. Heads & Intake●Intense S1X Cam●YT 1.7 RR's●FFF LT's●TCI 3800 stall●TSP Rumbler●
WarShrike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 07:08 AM   #4
Staging Lane
2000 Chevrolet Camaro
 
masterz28's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ontario, CA
Posts: 80
Default

I thought the same when i heard the numbers months ago, more like the V8 mustang loosing against a new V6 camaro, lol.
__________________

http://gmgears.webs.com
Join the SoCal Super Cruise! 7/26/09 http://clegendsc.webs.com/
www.fquick.com/Frankster
masterz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 08:26 AM   #5
TECH Addict
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 2,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 06C6FVR View Post
So do you guys think the new V6 camaro will run close to the numbers of the old LS1 cars in the 1/4 mile. The new V6 has 304 HP, and the LS1 i think was around 320....sounds pretty close...anyone run one of the new v6's at the track?

Just thought I would spark a debate

LS1 Fbodies made 345hp/375ft.lbs in a ~3500lbs car, the new Camaro has 304hp/273ft.lbs in a 3800lbs car, you can do the math...
__________________
'01 WS6 M6
JD_AMG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 09:14 AM   #6
TECH Fanatic
 
JohnnyC's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The 'Burgh, PA
Posts: 1,144
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD_AMG View Post

LS1 Fbodies made 345hp/375ft.lbs in a ~3500lbs car, the new Camaro has 304hp/273ft.lbs in a 3800lbs car, you can do the math...
Thank you for adding some reality to this thread.
__________________

2000 T/A WS6, Black on Black, M6, LM2 Cat-Back, SLP Y-Pipe, SLP Lid, P&P TB, WS6 Short Throw, Anti-CAGS, Little Tree Air Freshener-Vanillaroma Scent, 1/2 Tank of gas, 7/16 race cam, tornado, "built" engine, "tricked out" suspension.
JohnnyC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 09:59 AM   #7
On The Tree
 
racerns's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Smithfield, VA
Posts: 143
Default

It is more likely that the new V6 Camaro and a stock LT1 f-body would run close but I still might give the edge to the LT1.
__________________
Neil
'94 GS Camaro 396 LT4
'08 MGM G8 GT 12.59@109.6 MPH 1.89 60'
racerns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 10:34 AM   #8
12 Second Club
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Palmview, Tx
Posts: 531
Default

Just ran my g/f's 2010 Camaro V6 and it went 14.9@94mph with a 2.2 60ft. IIRC it was finishing the 1/4mile in (mid)3rd gear and pulling pretty hard. On the way back we raced a 96 Mustang GT and an 01 GT, both races we pulled ahead a few cars; the 01 GT was harder to shake off though.

No way this heavy V6 will pull on an LT1 much less an LS1; maybe with a CAI and some tuning it can hang with LT1's.
__________________
'98 TransAM A4
224R 114LSA, 3" ORY/Magnamouth(dumped), SLP lid, Smooth bellow, Custom tune, P&P TB, 3.73's, Trans-Go shift kit, Free-mods
street demon2k3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 10:38 AM   #9
12 Second Club
 
METALBEAST's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cleveland, Georgia
Posts: 3,026
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by street demon2k3 View Post
Just ran my g/f's 2010 Camaro V6 and it went 14.9@94mph with a 2.2 60ft. IIRC it was finishing the 1/4mile in (mid)3rd gear and pulling pretty hard. On the way back we raced a 96 Mustang GT and an 01 GT, both races we pulled ahead a few cars; the 01 GT was harder to shake off though.

No way this heavy V6 will pull on an LT1 much less an LS1; maybe with a CAI and some tuning it can hang with LT1's.
A car trapping 94 MPH pulled a few cars on a 2001 Mustang GT. Right.
__________________
1997 Camaro Z28 M6
1997 Mustang Cobra Build #6158
1991 Mustang GT M5
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a3...t1975/MCE2.gif
METALBEAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 10:53 AM   #10
12 Second Club
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Palmview, Tx
Posts: 531
Default

It was a stock GT with 3 200lbs passengers LOL!!!! Yes I know doesnt make sense, I thought he'd put at least 2 cars on me but IDK. Could have been a bad driver, it was a 5-speed and had some gangsta 20's on there.
__________________
'98 TransAM A4
224R 114LSA, 3" ORY/Magnamouth(dumped), SLP lid, Smooth bellow, Custom tune, P&P TB, 3.73's, Trans-Go shift kit, Free-mods
street demon2k3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 10:56 AM   #11
TECH Regular
 
Tricked-Out-Toy's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 449
Default

We have a shitty track in clarksville TN and last friday my buddy took his rental up there and with about 200miles on it went 9.7. not sure the mph since its a shitty track.. but to give ya an idea of how it does our other buddy was there and has an 03 mustang GT, headers/intake and the camaro walked away from him on the track and the street. From a roll or a dig the GT stayed with it till about the top of 2nd then the camaro would pull away...

To give you an idea of how shitty the track is our rental LS3 C6 would only run a best of 7.8...
__________________
sound Clip
Doughnut
LT1 LE3/LE2 HC, T56, 9" 4.11's, C5 front brakes, Longtubes w/ 3" over axle duals. Its cute http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2108104
http://x4.putfile.com/1/2412471193.jpg
Tricked-Out-Toy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 11:49 AM   #12
Launching!
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: League City, Tx
Posts: 280
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by street demon2k3 View Post
Just ran my g/f's 2010 Camaro V6 and it went 14.9@94mph with a 2.2 60ft. IIRC it was finishing the 1/4mile in (mid)3rd gear and pulling pretty hard. On the way back we raced a 96 Mustang GT and an 01 GT, both races we pulled ahead a few cars; the 01 GT was harder to shake off though.

No way this heavy V6 will pull on an LT1 much less an LS1; maybe with a CAI and some tuning it can hang with LT1's.
Thanks, that is what I was wanting to know...what kind of times they were running....14.9 is about what my 2000 silverado pickup ran stock!!...haha
__________________
07 Corvette Coupe, Lemans Blue, Z06 Wide body kit, wheels, tires, brakes. Magnaflow mufflers, Z06 Manifolds/Hpipe, Fast 92MM Intake, MTI Excelerator CAI, 3.90 Gears. 400RWHP, 400 RWTQ, best ET..11.73@121MPH (crappy 1.88 60' time)


06' C6 Corvette Coupe, Black on Black, Z51 Package, M6, Magnaflow Mufflers, MTI Tune 370 RWHP, 365 RWTQ, best time 12.02@115
12.235@115.58 (stock time)(gone but not forgotten)
06C6FVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 01:38 PM   #13
TECH Enthusiast
 
someday's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: here, ny
Posts: 644
Default

just as a comparison, back in the day, my '94 Z28 ran a 14.1@96 bone stock and 13.9@99 with an intake and catback, with a 3.23 auto, rated at 275/325... and LS1's made 305-310/335-340 in an F body...
__________________

'04 Monte Carlo SS/sc... Red/silver exterior, Black interior... drilled/slotted rotors, K&N AirCharger, 3" OR DP, Intense pcm, 180 thermostat...


'04 HD XL1200C... Blue/Orange flames, Bobtail rear fender, Custom front fender, 6 spoke front wheel, Chrome everything... Rinehart 2-1, Mid-Controls, Deuce Wheel w/ 170/60x17, Ness BS, 74hp/85tq... For Sale
someday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 02:50 PM   #14
TECH Addict
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 2,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 06C6FVR View Post
Thanks, that is what I was wanting to know...what kind of times they were running....14.9 is about what my 2000 silverado pickup ran stock!!...haha
You didn't think to check some auto mags? I've seen lowest of 14.2 @ ~98mph.
__________________
'01 WS6 M6
JD_AMG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 03:04 PM   #15
On The Tree
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 152
Default

Hot Rod ran a 14 flat in a new V6, this thing is a good race for LT1s and PI 2V GTs. Honestly who cares about the V6, if you're on this website your a car enthusiast and if you buy a V6 "pony/muscle" car you're probably gay.
__________________
00 C5: NX 150 shot, LG Streets, Corsa X, Z06 Ti's
Quick Sh0t xMLx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 03:09 PM   #16
TECH Addict
 
chavez885's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 9
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Edmond,OK
Posts: 2,071
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 06C6FVR View Post
So do you guys think the new V6 camaro will run close to the numbers of the old LS1 cars in the 1/4 mile. The new V6 has 304 HP, and the LS1 i think was around 320....sounds pretty close...anyone run one of the new v6's at the track?

Just thought I would spark a debate
Are you forreal?
chavez885 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 03:09 PM   #17
TECH Fanatic
 
SlvrV6Camaro's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Benbrook/Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,351
Send a message via AIM to SlvrV6Camaro
Default

I can't wait to see what the aftermarket for this car is like...plenty major companies are really interested in modding the V6. It without a doubt will be a big seller and plenty of people will want to mod it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Sh0t xMLx View Post
Hot Rod ran a 14 flat in a new V6, this thing is a good race for LT1s and PI 2V GTs. Honestly who cares about the V6, if you're on this website your a car enthusiast and if you buy a V6 "pony/muscle" car you're probably gay.
__________________

2002 Sunset Orange Firebird
SlvrV6Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 03:29 PM   #18
TECH Apprentice
 
108dragon's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern Colorado Front Range
Posts: 342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Sh0t xMLx View Post
Hot Rod ran a 14 flat in a new V6, this thing is a good race for LT1s and PI 2V GTs. Honestly who cares about the V6, if you're on this website your a car enthusiast and if you buy a V6 "pony/muscle" car you're probably gay.
hahaha That's all f***** up... but true.. I'm impressed with the 2SS in a rolling race and they are decent in a slalom.. But they don't have power to weight ratio for a drag. Gut it out and push the LS3 to 600+rwhp and then it will hand more than a few of us our asses in the quarter. I'm wondering if it's IRS suspension might be hurting the 2SS drag performance.
A 2SS WILL get an ugly guy laid though....
108dragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 11:49 PM   #19
Launching!
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arlington/College Station, Tx
Posts: 280
Send a message via AIM to Chadder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Sh0t xMLx View Post
Hot Rod ran a 14 flat in a new V6, this thing is a good race for LT1s and PI 2V GTs. Honestly who cares about the V6, if you're on this website your a car enthusiast and if you buy a V6 "pony/muscle" car you're probably gay.
Just remember kids, real car enthusiasts enjoy cars that perform well and retain respect towards trends that may not be in their personal tastes, ricer shit aside.

You're a tool.

Edit: besides, you should probably bring more than just a c5 on juice if you're going to start the shit talking.
Chadder is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 12:37 AM   #20
On The Tree
 
kilrbecars1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 162
Default

The new Camaro is a the new LED SLED!
__________________
kilrbecars1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2010, automatic, cai, camaro, headers, ls1, mods, performance, pipes, programmer, significant, ss, straight, turbo, v6


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 PM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS