Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > VEHICLE SPECIFIC FORUMS > 2010 Camaro
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

View Poll Results: Rate the 2009 Camaro
I rather drive a Ford. 131 6.12%
1 20 0.93%
2 29 1.35%
3 49 2.29%
4 42 1.96%
5 130 6.07%
6 110 5.14%
7 228 10.65%
8 396 18.50%
9 273 12.75%
10 733 34.24%
Voters: 2141. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-10-2007, 07:59 PM   #81
TECH Resident
 
6techniques's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 839
Default

better than nothing i say.
__________________
TRANS AM... That will be all... now
6techniques is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 08:13 PM   #82
12 Second Club
 
Chocolate Apocalypse's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Vegas
Posts: 328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonppr
Lets see some atvantages of less weight
1. Higher MPG
2. Lower emissions
3. Better handling
4. Faster

And how about one disadvantage....MORE EXPENSIVE!
GM is going to do what they can to keep the weight down but there is just so much they can do considering the cost of materials and safety regs. Remember, GM wants to sell over 100k of these beauties annually and it has to be priced competitively against Rustangs. Its not going to be a lightweight but it is going to be a V8 powered, 400+ hp, 2+2 with CAMARO on the side.
Chocolate Apocalypse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 09:11 PM   #83
V8 RWD x3 Director
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lincolnwood, IL Member: #317
Posts: 12,785
Default

Hmmm,

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonppr
1. Higher MPG
Who cares? If MPG is a main concern, then a high performance V8 Camaro shouldn't be your primary car.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonppr
2. Lower emissions
Again, who cares? Environmental concerns are generally meaningless to most high performance V8 consumers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonppr
3. Better handling
A 3600-3700lb car can handle decently well, especially with IRS. Won't be the best in the world in this catigory, but if I wanted small sports car like handling with big V8 muscle, I'd just get a Vette. That's why they build 'em.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonppr
4. Faster
Heavy doesn't always mean slow. Give it decent power for the weight and the weight won't matter. Also, you'll always have the option of gutting weight or adding more power.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonppr
A heavier car is going to have to have a smaller engine to keep the MPG up and emmisions down. Which I don't really care about but I am sure the gov does.
Things like a 6-speed auto, and DOD systems can keep MPG up even in a heavier car with a big V8. In case you haven't noticed, most GM models are receiving larger displacement engines with each redesign of a model, even though many cars are getting heavier as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonppr
As for handling and being faster, well its a sports/musle car if you don't want that then why do you want this type of car? just for looks?
Muscle cars aren't really supposed to be about premium handling, more about premium straight line power. And if it gets the LS3, then straight line power will be plentiful even at 36-3700lbs. The Vette is the car you should be shopping for if the best in handling and V8 power are your goals. And as I stated above, it's not like the thing is going to handle like a '76 Eldorado just because it might weigh 150-200lbs more than the average 4th gen. It will still handle very well for a street car I'm sure.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonppr
as far as wheels and gauges. I don't think the wheel choice or gauges are going to make the difference as far as weight goes.
Actually, for someone who is worried about weight, wheel & tire weight should concern you. It is unsprung weight, and will effect overall acceleration more than if the extra weight was on the body of the car instead.

I don't expect GM to make the car 3200lbs and still sell for their target price range. I'd be just fine with anything under 3700lbs with a 425hp LS3 and a 6-speed auto or manual option. Wrap that up in a car that looks like the current Camaro concept, and I'd be all over that tomorrow if I could get my hands on it. Of course lighter is better, but I'm not going to pass the car up based on weight alone. I'll be looking at the entire package.
RPM WS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2007, 03:10 PM   #84
Staging Lane
 
jonintheredcamaro's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Plant City, Florida
Posts: 91
Send a message via AIM to jonintheredcamaro
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RPM WS6
Hmmm,



Who cares? If MPG is a main concern, then a high performance V8 Camaro shouldn't be your primary car.



Again, who cares? Environmental concerns are generally meaningless to most high performance V8 consumers.



A 3600-3700lb car can handle decently well, especially with IRS. Won't be the best in the world in this catigory, but if I wanted small sports car like handling with big V8 muscle, I'd just get a Vette. That's why they build 'em.



Heavy doesn't always mean slow. Give it decent power for the weight and the weight won't matter. Also, you'll always have the option of gutting weight or adding more power.



Things like a 6-speed auto, and DOD systems can keep MPG up even in a heavier car with a big V8. In case you haven't noticed, most GM models are receiving larger displacement engines with each redesign of a model, even though many cars are getting heavier as well.



Muscle cars aren't really supposed to be about premium handling, more about premium straight line power. And if it gets the LS3, then straight line power will be plentiful even at 36-3700lbs. The Vette is the car you should be shopping for if the best in handling and V8 power are your goals. And as I stated above, it's not like the thing is going to handle like a '76 Eldorado just because it might weigh 150-200lbs more than the average 4th gen. It will still handle very well for a street car I'm sure.



Actually, for someone who is worried about weight, wheel & tire weight should concern you. It is unsprung weight, and will effect overall acceleration more than if the extra weight was on the body of the car instead.

I don't expect GM to make the car 3200lbs and still sell for their target price range. I'd be just fine with anything under 3700lbs with a 425hp LS3 and a 6-speed auto or manual option. Wrap that up in a car that looks like the current Camaro concept, and I'd be all over that tomorrow if I could get my hands on it. Of course lighter is better, but I'm not going to pass the car up based on weight alone. I'll be looking at the entire package.
You, sir, are my new hero.
__________________
jonintheredcamaro has a new username: JonintheRedZ28
I changed it to match pretty much every other forum I'm on, and my FQuick.
www.fquick.com/JonintheRedZ28
jonintheredcamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 10:26 AM   #85
TECH Enthusiast
 
B4CZR2's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Spencerport, NY
Posts: 522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RPM WS6
Hmmm,



Who cares? If MPG is a main concern, then a high performance V8 Camaro shouldn't be your primary car.



Again, who cares? Environmental concerns are generally meaningless to most high performance V8 consumers.



A 3600-3700lb car can handle decently well, especially with IRS. Won't be the best in the world in this catigory, but if I wanted small sports car like handling with big V8 muscle, I'd just get a Vette. That's why they build 'em.



Heavy doesn't always mean slow. Give it decent power for the weight and the weight won't matter. Also, you'll always have the option of gutting weight or adding more power.



Things like a 6-speed auto, and DOD systems can keep MPG up even in a heavier car with a big V8. In case you haven't noticed, most GM models are receiving larger displacement engines with each redesign of a model, even though many cars are getting heavier as well.



Muscle cars aren't really supposed to be about premium handling, more about premium straight line power. And if it gets the LS3, then straight line power will be plentiful even at 36-3700lbs. The Vette is the car you should be shopping for if the best in handling and V8 power are your goals. And as I stated above, it's not like the thing is going to handle like a '76 Eldorado just because it might weigh 150-200lbs more than the average 4th gen. It will still handle very well for a street car I'm sure.



Actually, for someone who is worried about weight, wheel & tire weight should concern you. It is unsprung weight, and will effect overall acceleration more than if the extra weight was on the body of the car instead.

I don't expect GM to make the car 3200lbs and still sell for their target price range. I'd be just fine with anything under 3700lbs with a 425hp LS3 and a 6-speed auto or manual option. Wrap that up in a car that looks like the current Camaro concept, and I'd be all over that tomorrow if I could get my hands on it. Of course lighter is better, but I'm not going to pass the car up based on weight alone. I'll be looking at the entire package.
I agree with you 100%, but MPGs people do care about these days. People want to have and eat their cake. If it isn't good on gas then people will look to the next closest thing that is (v8 and fuel efficient). I wouldn't mind having like what the vettes got, 4-500HP on tap and 30MPGs, then you could take it on long road trips and not have it kill your wallet. Which is the main reason I hate my A4, I can't eat my cake with gears in it.
Personally I think GM will probably have the best fuel economy between the brands for their base V8 and possibly the top range v8 as long as it doesn't come super-charged

And as far as emissions go, Global warming may or may not be happening because to humans... maybe just the Indians(from india not the US) or chinese, make them go greener theres more of them! Who really knows the natural cycle of the planet? We should be more concerned with what we are dumping in our back yards then whats releasing more carbon emissions... my two cents
__________________

1994 B4C Medium Quasar Blue Camaro: Pacesetter OR LT&Y, Summit Cutout, MSD Coil+Pro Billet Opti, walbro 255fp, back to stock stall for now w/3.42 gears
2003 GMC ZR2 Sonoma Indigo Blue 17.1@80 stock full weight including spare
Deceased 1996 B4C 13.8 @101 2.0s 60ft Stock with SLP CAI & Shift Module
Cardomain Garage

Last edited by B4CZR2; 07-12-2007 at 10:36 AM..
B4CZR2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 12:17 PM   #86
TECH Enthusiast
 
shudog's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Berkley, MI
Posts: 577
Send a message via Yahoo to shudog
Default

I like it but it's not the greatest thing I've ever seen. I don't like rear tail lights, they don't fit the rest of the styling in my opinion. It's almost as if they were trying to copy the Vette tail lights but didn't want to go all the way. I'd rather see something like a solid bar across, and definitely using LED's like the Cadillac STS has, so nice. Overall though, I really like the lines, the side view and the front view. Proportions seem good, longer hood, shorter trunk, nice big wheels, aggressive fender flares. Interior looks pretty good too.
shudog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 06:32 PM   #87
Staging Lane
 
The American's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 50
Default

10.

I have to put this as the best designed car. I have to say I like it better than the vette. I see styling cues from all years in the car. I expect the car to be tone down like the mustang was, but if it gets the LS3 as the base V8 model it stays a 10 in my book.
The American is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 06:44 PM   #88
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 39
Default

Give me the new mustang or the challenger. Not impressed with the new camaro.
__________________
Whisper lid, Optima redtop, Flowtech longtubes & y-pipe, Borla catback, LS6 intake, 80mm BBK tbody, 85mm GMAF, Frost tune, MSD 8.5mm wires, Blisten shocks, UMI SFCs, LCAs, PHB, & RLBs
Calico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 07:51 PM   #89
TECH Fanatic
 
shoemike's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 17
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 1,054
Default

forget this POS i heard ford is bringing back the model T.
shoemike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 08:04 PM   #90
Staging Lane
 
The American's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 50
Default

This is a link to the Model T info.

2009 model year lineup--- modularfords.com
The American is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 08:06 PM   #91
TECH Resident
 
1BadAction's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 8
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South FL
Posts: 797
Send a message via AIM to 1BadAction
Default

lmao. man thats the worst song ever.
__________________
"Any fool can know, the point is to understand." - Albert Einstein
79 16' Action Marine/05 2.5L 280ss
(3.66lb/hp - does it need mods?)
07 Imperial Blue Metallic TBSS (is Zaino a mod?)
93 2dr Blazer project (aluminum block and sneezing intake mod)
1BadAction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 08:19 PM   #92
Staging Lane
 
The American's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 50
Default

lol. And the idea of Model T being reincarnated is worse.
The American is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 08:52 PM   #93
Banned
 
The PAT WS6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 14
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Keller
Posts: 1,704
Default

i like it but i dont knw if i wills ell my car.
The PAT WS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 03:22 PM   #94
TECH Resident
1998 Pontiac Firebird
 
TT632's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Any dragstrip any time
Posts: 848
Default

I didn't care for the car when they first showed the images of it. Then, when the Chief Designer was saying he didn't want it to be too retro I thought he was nuts. The Mustang and the especially the Challenger are very retro. They look great. Thats the market they should be after!
But, after seeing the 05 Mustang start to look dated so fast, I'm inclined to see what he was talking about.

Anyone who has sat through the Transformers movie will realize GM has a big winner on their hands. Ive never seen a movie where half the people leaving are saying "I have to have that car". Teens, middle aged men and women, black, white, even the French!!! OK, my bad, maybe not the French.
Anyway! I have evil, evil plans for mine and the IRS will probably go as soon as I get it home.
TT632 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 03:59 PM   #95
On The Tree
 
camaro468's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 6
Join Date: May 2007
Location: arlington tx
Posts: 158
Default

i like it looks like the 1st gen witch i have and think is the best gen of camaros and then the 4th gen dont like the 2nd or 3rd gen have owend all gen have a 69 and a 98 now but what will be the price tag like
camaro468 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 04:10 PM   #96
TECH Resident
 
1BadAction's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 8
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South FL
Posts: 797
Send a message via AIM to 1BadAction
Default

^^ punctuation is your friend. IMO.

I'm really diggin this new camaro, it has alot of third/first gen style in it, without being a blatant copy like the stang and challenger are. They look good, but from a design standpoint might as well be a carbon copy, and that makes me automatically hate them. I have no respect for companies that don't R&D new products. Then again, my taste might be flawed, cause my 2 favorite body styles are #1 3rd gen, and #2 1st gen.
__________________
"Any fool can know, the point is to understand." - Albert Einstein
79 16' Action Marine/05 2.5L 280ss
(3.66lb/hp - does it need mods?)
07 Imperial Blue Metallic TBSS (is Zaino a mod?)
93 2dr Blazer project (aluminum block and sneezing intake mod)
1BadAction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 04:35 PM   #97
TECH Resident
 
rk_2000_Z/28's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Enid, OK
Posts: 843
Default

10!!!!!!!!
__________________

03 Cobra-475/441 to the wheels
02 SS & 00 Z/28-Gone
rk_2000_Z/28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 07:29 PM   #98
TECH Resident
 
KB99WS6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 6
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 948
Default

Anyone who thinks this car is ugly needs an eye exam and a brain scam. Definite 10! Absolutley perfect blend of retro and modern muscle. AWESOME LOOKING!!
__________________
01 Z06: Zaino'd Black on Black. PRC H/C, Vararam, Dynatech LT's & X-pipe, Borla Stingers, CF clutch. VD built/tuned. GMPP warranty till 10/09. Fast & 30mpg highway

-Red 1999 WS6 M6 Trans Am:
Sold Oct-05 at 32k miles in showroom cond.
Zaino/garage queen, Full Bolt-on's, BMR Suspension
17X9 & 17X11 Timeless 2's, Alpine, RF, Focal & ED Stereo.
KB99WS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2007, 11:41 AM   #99
Staging Lane
 
FireStorm's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 91
Send a message via ICQ to FireStorm Send a message via AIM to FireStorm Send a message via MSN to FireStorm Send a message via Yahoo to FireStorm
Default

definitely a 10.. badass mfing car..
__________________
Red 2000 Camaro 3800, A4, LSD, 3.42
My FQuick Garage
More Pictures
Midwest F-Body Association
FireStorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2007, 11:47 AM   #100
On The Tree
 
Tamatt27's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 141
Send a message via AIM to Tamatt27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The American
10.

I have to put this as the best designed car. I have to say I like it better than the vette. I see styling cues from all years in the car. I expect the car to be tone down like the mustang was, but if it gets the LS3 as the base V8 model it stays a 10 in my book.
The LS3 is a little too much for a 'base' V8, IMO. I like the new Camaro styling, but will not be purchasing one. I'm waiting for the new GTO...
Tamatt27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
c5, drinking, exhaust, george, gtp, hvac, miles, phucken, quantum, slp, solace, twenty, ugly, walk, weight


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS