View Single Post
Old 11-23-2006, 12:48 AM   #38
Maggie
TECH Enthusiast
 
Maggie's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SScam68
Maggie

What results are you seeing on the track?
Certainly the most apparent results are increased longevity, lower case/lub temps and very little or no break-in at all required. On lightweight gear sets shattering was a big problem which was greatly reduced with the supper-polished gear sets. This is enough to justify the cost of the process imo.

As far as on track results, it is very hard to attribute exact gains to the gears...unfortunately the type of data logging needed to verify such gains was not always availble: Just for what it worth, On a Stock Eliminator car, that we were able to use as a test mule, when we compared data logs from with/without we saw a 17 hp gain in calculated horse Power with a REM processed tranny and final gear set.
__________________
I'm a retired racer. I miss racing. I miss going fast. I miss competing.
Never thought I would miss the wrenching and the mashed fingers, skinned knuckles, burns, bruises, and upside down welding and such...Well, the hot dingle berry finding it’s way into my ear and the sizzling ear wax sucked... That I don’t miss.

Last edited by Maggie; 11-23-2006 at 12:59 AM..
Maggie is offline   Reply With Quote