Generation IV External Engine LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS2 intake vs. Fast 90

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2007, 12:26 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
1badnova496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hartselle,Alabama
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LS2 intake vs. Fast 90

Does anyone have any dyno numbers in the difference between the LS2 intake and the Fast 90?
Old 04-03-2007, 12:30 AM
  #2  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1badnova496
Does anyone have any dyno numbers in the difference between the LS2 intake and the Fast 90?
At least 20 unported to unported....(the FAST clearly the winner)....and I have seen as much as 32 HP with one of my ported intakes against a stock out of the box LS2. Had the LS2 been ported that ridiculous "delta" would have probably been cut in half, but even a 15 HP difference (ported against ported) is quite alot to leave under the table.

Dont just take my word for it....do some homework. There are plenty of threads that discuss how weak the stock LS2 intake is....very similar to an LS1 in power out, both of which are 5-7 softer than an LS6 even though the LS2 has a larger TB (which is usually never the real restriction and the reason it doesn't help).

Use the search feature....lots of info out there discussing what you seek.

Tony
Old 04-04-2007, 11:35 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Spinmonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 721
Received 60 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

LG did a post on this exact topic:

Originally Posted by Anthony @ LGMotorsports
Many were asking about the difference between porting your stock LS2 intake vs. doing a FAST install. I am happy to share the results with you.

Again.
Run #19 was the same 2007 LG Pro Long Tube C6 M6 with FAST intake manifold
Run #14 was done on a 2005 LG Pro Long Tube C6 M6 with a ported LS2 intake manifold.



As you can see there is a huge jump in torque throughout the RPM range starting around 3500 RPM all the way over 5000 RPM. At no point does it loose any HP or TQ throughout the pull.

LG Pro Long Tube headers + FAST intake, makes for a very potent package! Pick up a G5X series cam package to make for a Z06 killer!
As you can see, the area under the curve is far more impressive than the peak HP and TQ numbers would indicate. The difference is more impressive than some headers are in terms of gains. At 4500-5000 there is nearly 20+rwhp gained as opposed to those that would have you beleive the gain is merely 9hp. The TQ is even more sick.
Old 04-05-2007, 02:10 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
1badnova496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hartselle,Alabama
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks for the info



Quick Reply: LS2 intake vs. Fast 90



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM.