 | |
11-14-2003, 05:53 PM
|
#21 | | TECH Resident
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: orlando, florida
Posts: 952
| Why am i hearing alot that a 72cc head will make a 9.5:1 comp ratio on a stock ls1 when the write up says 9.1:1 ?
__________________ 98 T/A WS6 m6 suncoast raptor hood 30th anniversary stripes, SSR integral 18" wheels, blue black metalic paint with white stripes, bassoni cat back. ls1 with lunati forged pistons 9.3:1comp., ported 6.0 heads. Hotchkis, LCA, panhard, subframes. TTi dyno #s with ported 6.0s, and a T76@12psi, 537rwhp 563rwtq. TTI turbo kit now sold.  New hand fab'd single turbo kit sporting a MP GT45. |
| |
11-19-2003, 10:44 PM
|
#22 | | TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 647
| Question about head numbers Ok great info, now, how do we calculate that for a 427 with a 4.125 bore.
Thanks
Bryan |
| |
11-24-2003, 09:42 AM
|
#23 | | TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Maple Grove MN
Posts: 362
| MYTURBO T/A - I was wondering the exact same thing. Everybody says a 317 casting 6.0 head will put you at 9.6 - 9.7 CR with the stock 71 cc chambers. That doesnt match up with that table very well. Which one is correct?
Justin
__________________ 2000 Camaro M6, black, ATI Procharger D-1SC @7psi, MMS SC crank pulley, CNC ported TB, Ported MAF, NX kit , inline 255 pump, 42.5lb injectors, Spec Stage 3 Ceramic, SLP subframes, Strange 12 bolt w/ 33 spline axles & 4.11s, BMR strut tower brace, BMR adj LCAs, billet PHR, SLP high flow radiator, Mac mid-length headers with offroad Y-pipe, digital boost, fuel presure, nitrous, boost, & dual A/F Phantom gauges, LS1edit, EFIlive, 490RWHP @6200 & 442RWTQ @5200 (no N20 with 11:1 a/f on 92 octane) |
| |
11-24-2003, 10:29 AM
|
#24 | | TECH Resident
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: orlando, florida
Posts: 952
| Many people have bolted on stock 6.0 heads and all of them report a 9.5-9.6 comp ratio so I trust that to be acurate.
__________________ 98 T/A WS6 m6 suncoast raptor hood 30th anniversary stripes, SSR integral 18" wheels, blue black metalic paint with white stripes, bassoni cat back. ls1 with lunati forged pistons 9.3:1comp., ported 6.0 heads. Hotchkis, LCA, panhard, subframes. TTi dyno #s with ported 6.0s, and a T76@12psi, 537rwhp 563rwtq. TTI turbo kit now sold.  New hand fab'd single turbo kit sporting a MP GT45. |
| |
12-10-2003, 01:14 PM
|
#25 | | Launching!
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Portland OR
Posts: 230
| Something doesn't seem right ... Yes, I know this is my first post - I've just started reading these forums after buying an LS1 to put in my 71 Camaro. But I've got a lot of experience with the "old tech" motors
Just looking at the table at the beginning of this post, it seemed to me to exaggerate the sensitivity of CR to chamber volume. So I ran a quick calculation or two, using the basic formula I've always used to compute CR (lots of places to find this, the constants I use are from "Lingenfelter on modifying small block chevy engines"). The overall calculation is pretty straightforward:
CR = (SV + CV) / CV
where:
CR = compression ratio
SV = Swept Volume (displacement of one cylinder)
CV = Compressed Volume (volume at piston TDC)
To get the swept volume of one cylinder in CCs, the handy formula is:
bore x bore x stroke x 12.8704
For a stock short block, this works out:
3.90 x 3.90 x 3.62 x 12.8704 = 709 CC (rounded up)
Compressed volume is the sum of chamber volume, deck volume, gasket volume, and piston dish volume (including valve reliefs). For a stock LS1:
Chamber volume = 66.67
Deck volume = 3.9 x 3.9 x 12.8704 x (-.006) = -1.17 CC (negative because piston out of hole)
Gasket volume = 3.9 x 3.9 x 12.8704 x .060 = 11.7 CC (guessing on the gasket bore?)
Piston dish volume = 0 (true flat top piston)
Thus CV = 66.67 + 11.7 - 1.17 = 77.2 CC
Put all of this into the first formula:
CR = (709 + 77.2) / 77.2 = 10.18
Pretty close - my guess is that I've got gasket size slightly off, or that the factory is taking into account the piston/ring/wall volume, or something like that.
Anyway, the interesting thing is to run this with some different chamber volumes. Shrink the chamber by 8 CCs (to 58.67):
CR = (709 + 69.2) / 69.2 = 11.25
Expand the volume by 6 CCs (to 72.67):
CR = (709 + 83.2) / 83.2 = 9.5
So it seems to me that the table in this post does slightly exaggerate the changes in CR due to chamber volume. Or am I completely missing something? |
| |
12-10-2003, 01:44 PM
|
#26 | | ? ? ? ? ? ?
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: East of Dallas
Posts: 6,237
| Did you take into account that the Gen III motors have a negative deck height? About .008 I think. Also, depending on the type of GM gasket, compressed height is usually .054 or .060.
__________________ Richard-
2008 TBSS daily driver
Current projects: 2002 Silverado RCSB, 1967 Chevy C10 LS conversion
Retired: 2003 Z71 Tahoe, 2003 Silverado SS |
| |
12-10-2003, 02:23 PM
|
#27 | | Launching!
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Portland OR
Posts: 230
| I did account for the piston out of hole - I used .006, based on some other posts I'd read. I used a .060 gasket thickness. Fiddling with those two parameters will increase or decrease the individual CR calculations slightly, but the point about relationship between CR and chamber volume remains ... |
| |
12-29-2003, 11:46 AM
|
#28 | | 8 Second Club
Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,456
| I think it would be beneficial to add to the original post that if you're using the later GM MLS gasket, that will decrease your compression by .1 - .2.
Craig
__________________ 2001 T/A WS6, Pewter, M6
FMS F13; Jet Hot LT's; SPEC 3; ARE TT2's; DynoJet WBC; HP Tuner
Best ET: 11.61 @ 118.6 on a 1.64 60', 3610# raceweight 1968 FIREBIRD, 498 BBC, F2 ProCharger, CSU Carb
5.32 @ 131, 8.27 @ 168, 3290# raceweight, 1.22 60', 16psi boost SEE PICS HERE |
| |
02-19-2004, 07:21 AM
|
#29 | | 8 sec Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 5,458
| making this thread sticky again  |
| |
02-19-2004, 03:52 PM
|
#30 | | Launching!
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Portland OR
Posts: 230
| If this is going to be sticky again, the calculations should probably be redone (see my post above).
__________________ 71 Camaro LS1, AFR 205s, Comp 224/228, FAST 90/90, 453 RWHP, Baer brakes, Hotchkis suspension.
67 Camaro convert, 548 Aluminum BB, 618 RWHP, Super Rod cover car. |
| |
02-20-2004, 01:00 PM
|
#31 | | Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Forced Induction Heaven
Posts: 427
| I just used Ross Piston's Calculator and can not get to 9:1 CR using the following data.
Bore 3.898
Stroke 3.622
Head Gasket .060
Deck Height -.008
Piston Dish .00
CC Volume 72
Cylinders 8
I get 9.6:1
How do you get 9:1 using stock gasket thickness and 72 cc head volume????????
__________________ Click on my updated website for all the cool mods I have done
Current car/setup:
2001 P*K Twin Turbo Z06 - 850/804 rear hp/tq @18#, 590/550 rear hp/tq @8.75#
Previous Cars/mods:
ATI D1 Procharger and TTi TT on Z06. ; 1997 C5 H&C 430/400 rwhp/rwtq |
| |
02-25-2004, 08:52 AM
|
#32 | | 8 sec Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 5,458
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by 71CamaroLS1 If this is going to be sticky again, the calculations should probably be redone (see my post above). | Something definately not right here. I'll unsticky this again until resolved  |
| |
02-26-2004, 08:20 PM
|
#33 | | 12 Second Club
Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 794
| Using 3.898 bore, 3.622 stroke, -0.008 deck hight, 0.00 dish pistons, and 0.060 gasket thickness this is what i come up with...
9.1:1 = 77.27
9.2:1 = 76.21
9.3:1 = 75.16
9.4:1 = 74.15
9.5:1 = 73.16
9.6:1 = 72.19
9.7:1 = 71.24 (Approximate Combustion chamber of 6.0L heads +/-)
9.8:1 = 70.32
9.9:1 = 69.41
10.0:1 = 68.53
10.1:1 = 67.66
10.2:1 = 66.67 (Stock LS1 Head)
10.3:1 = 65.96
10.4:1 = 65.18
10.5:1 = 64.45 (Stock LS6 Head)
10.6:1 = 63.61
10.7:1 = 62.85
10.8:1 = 62.10
10.9:1 = 61.37 (Approximate Combustion chamber of 5.3L heads +/-)
11.0:1 = 60.66
11.1:1 = 59.96
11.2:1 = 59.27
11.3:1 = 58.60
11.4:1 = 57.93
11.5:1 = 57.28
11.6:1 = 56.65
11.7:1 = 56.02
11.8:1 = 55.41
11.9:1 = 54.81
12.0:1 = 54.20
15.4:1 = 38.00 (Stock C5R Head)
Although the stock ls1 compression figure may seem off, i have seen a lot of sites selling "stock ls1 long block" with a 10.2:1 compression ratio (i.e. pace performance). Perhaps 10.2:1 is the true compression ratio of a stock LS1 motor and GM says otherwise. GM has a nice way of making up their own horsepower and torque ratings for motors as they see fit, perhaps they figure 10:1 is just easier to say. The LS6 compression ratio seems right on according to the combustion chamber and the calculations. Since no one has ever been able to give a diffinitive answer on the actual size of a 6.0L combustion chambers (i've seen anywhere from 70cc-72cc) i think it is safe to assume that 6.0L heads would not lower a stock LS1/LS6 motor's compression ratio any more than 9.6:1.
If you notice on the original chart by the original thread starter, all combustion chamber sizes are exatly .56cc different per tenth from 9.1:1 to 11.6:1. That is obviously impossible. As the compression ratio increases, the combustion chamber does not decrease by equal incriments. A simple analogy would be swapping rear end gears without recalibrating your speedometer. If you swap from 3.42's to 4.11's your speedometer will read 15 miles per hour faster at 90mph and will read 5 miles per hour faster 20mph. It won't read a consistant increase/decrease across the board.
Hope this helps some people out. 
__________________ 2000 Camaro SS A3 Carbed Project Car
Stock Short Block, Stock Heads, 231/237, Mike's TH400, Spohn/BMR Suspension, QA1/Comp Shocks, Moser 12-Bolt, 28X10's 2000 Silverado 1500 WT 5.3 The Beater 2007 Silverado 2500HD LTZ Duramax Allison 4X4 My Luxury Vehicle
Last edited by bad2000ss; 02-26-2004 at 08:55 PM..
|
| |
02-27-2004, 12:28 PM
|
#34 | | Staging Lane
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: East Hartford, CT
Posts: 74
| TTT
these calcs are w/0.00 dish pistons ... my pistons have 8cc reliefs cut in them... so could I just add 8cc to the Compress Volume?
Trying to figure out my CR ... 382 (3.898 bore, 4.000 stroke) using Felpro gaskets (so I heard they're .040" compressed?) w/unmilled TEA S2 5.3 heads (63cc chamber volume) |
| |
02-27-2004, 12:38 PM
|
#35 | | ? ? ? ? ? ?
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: East of Dallas
Posts: 6,237
| Felpro makes several LS1 gaskets. They have graphite and MLS I think. The 1041 MLS gasket has .043 compressed height and a 4.1" bore (from the package). Their stock replacement gasket probably has a stock compressed thickness of between .054 - .060".
__________________ Richard-
2008 TBSS daily driver
Current projects: 2002 Silverado RCSB, 1967 Chevy C10 LS conversion
Retired: 2003 Z71 Tahoe, 2003 Silverado SS |
| |
02-27-2004, 03:04 PM
|
#36 | | 12 Second Club
Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 794
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by tux2112 TTT
these calcs are w/0.00 dish pistons ... my pistons have 8cc reliefs cut in them... so could I just add 8cc to the Compress Volume?
Trying to figure out my CR ... 382 (3.898 bore, 4.000 stroke) using Felpro gaskets (so I heard they're .040" compressed?) w/unmilled TEA S2 5.3 heads (63cc chamber volume) | With a 63cc combustion chamber, 3.898 bore, 4.000 stroke, -0.008 deck hight, -8cc dish pistons, and 0.040 gasket thickness i come up with 11.1:1
__________________ 2000 Camaro SS A3 Carbed Project Car
Stock Short Block, Stock Heads, 231/237, Mike's TH400, Spohn/BMR Suspension, QA1/Comp Shocks, Moser 12-Bolt, 28X10's 2000 Silverado 1500 WT 5.3 The Beater 2007 Silverado 2500HD LTZ Duramax Allison 4X4 My Luxury Vehicle
Last edited by bad2000ss; 02-27-2004 at 03:10 PM..
|
| |
03-01-2004, 12:50 PM
|
#37 | | Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Forced Induction Heaven
Posts: 427
| Stock 2002 MLS Crushed Head Gasket Thickness is .054 not .060
__________________ Click on my updated website for all the cool mods I have done
Current car/setup:
2001 P*K Twin Turbo Z06 - 850/804 rear hp/tq @18#, 590/550 rear hp/tq @8.75#
Previous Cars/mods:
ATI D1 Procharger and TTi TT on Z06. ; 1997 C5 H&C 430/400 rwhp/rwtq |
| |
05-04-2004, 06:31 AM
|
#38 | | Teching In
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Australia
Posts: 18
| Guy's, are the MLS gasket's the later metal type? So if using these on a block that has the graphite gasket b4 you will loose .1 comp? |
| |
05-08-2004, 04:55 PM
|
#39 | | Banned
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Ft. Myers Fl
Posts: 3,140
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Shinobi'sZ I just used Ross Piston's Calculator and can not get to 9:1 CR using the following data.
Bore 3.898
Stroke 3.622
Head Gasket .060
Deck Height -.008
Piston Dish .00
CC Volume 72
Cylinders 8
I get 9.6:1
How do you get 9:1 using stock gasket thickness and 72 cc head volume???????? |
You entered .060 when it would acturally be .052 This is what a stock head gasket is. With the same numbers you have and the different head gasket size the C/R comes out to 9.7:1, (this was with a .0008 deck height) still pretty close to where you were at. The only thing I could not do is add a negative .008 in the factor. The ross calculator dosen't allow a negative number in that spot. When using a .008 (instead of .0008) it come out to 9.55:1?????????????????????????? |
| |
05-13-2004, 12:03 AM
|
#40 | | TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,574
| i believe my chambers are coming out around 68cc in my 5.7 heads.
if i use a stock graphite gaskit how much do i need to mill the heads
to get a 10.75 to 10.8-1 CR....anyone???
or is there a gasket i can use to get that CR ???????
__________________ 1998 Z28 M6 SOLD
315rwhp (3500lbs)
1999 HUGGER SS SOLD
400rwhp (3375lbs)
2002 YELLOW Z06 
340rwhp (3040lbs) |
| |  | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | |