Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Conversions & Hybrids
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-01-2008, 04:47 PM   #41
Launching!
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 71buickfreak View Post
What about the LH8 oil pan? Any dimension for it?
Any GM part numbers for this pan? and this is a dumb question but I have not decided on LS1 or an LS2. Won't most parts interchange between the two? IE: Motor mounts, oil pan etc etc?

Dan
__________________
1956 Belair 2 door Hardtop project with an LS1
1965 SWB Big Window C-10 (soon to be LS1 powered)
AustinYukon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 05:54 AM   #42
Banned
 
bluecamaroz28's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 779
Default

Is this going to fit F-body?

bluecamaroz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 10:34 AM   #43
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1
Default Oil Pan Strength

I was considering using an aftermarket oil pan to help with clearance issues. However, I was concerned about the aftermarket pans not providing structural strength to the engine block. I would assume GM chose a cast pan for a reason. If the pan were not needed to provide structural strength to the block, GM would have made it out of stamped steel. Does anyone know if this assumption is correct? Do the aftermarket pans, such as the Canton P/N 13-274A or the Autokraft pans, provide structural support to the block?

Thanks.

LS1 xjs
ls1xjs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 10:50 AM   #44
TECH Fanatic
 
Project GatTagO's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 1,792
Send a message via AIM to Project GatTagO
Default

I think that GM uses cast pans mainly for noise suppression. The blocks on the LSx engines use deep skirts and crossbolted main caps. I seriously doubt that the pan would take away enough rigidity to become an issue. This is just my opinion.

Andrew
__________________
1970 GTO Version 2.0 in progress
V8TV Feature video
Popular Hotrodding feature
Car Craft feature

"You were the gun, your voice was the trigger, your bravery was the barrel, your eyes were the bullets."
Project GatTagO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 12:03 PM   #45
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7
Default

Any GM part numbers for the LH8 pan assembly?
Austinbelair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 07:30 PM   #46
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edgerton, Ks
Posts: 92
Default

I have 12614821 for the lh8 pan... $ 119 from my dealer.....

Rick
flywheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 08:07 PM   #47
Launching!
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flywheel View Post
I have 12614821 for the lh8 pan... $ 119 from my dealer.....

Rick
Thanks, Rick.

I'm guessin that part number is just the pan and not the pick up tube and other parts needed? It shows up as $96 on GMPD.

Hmmm
__________________
1956 Belair 2 door Hardtop project with an LS1
1965 SWB Big Window C-10 (soon to be LS1 powered)
AustinYukon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 09:07 PM   #48
TECH Apprentice
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Right here, right now!
Posts: 372
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ls1xjs View Post
I was considering using an aftermarket oil pan to help with clearance issues. However, I was concerned about the aftermarket pans not providing structural strength to the engine block. I would assume GM chose a cast pan for a reason. If the pan were not needed to provide structural strength to the block, GM would have made it out of stamped steel. Does anyone know if this assumption is correct? Do the aftermarket pans, such as the Canton P/N 13-274A or the Autokraft pans, provide structural support to the block?

Thanks.

LS1 xjs
From what I have seen you are correct on this LS1 XJS. Have read in a number of places, quotes from GM engineering folks, that the pan is designed to be a stressed member of the engine assembly and is certainly an integral and critical component in the trans/block/front & rear cover setup. I recall that even the shop manual may mention this. ("Oil Pan Alignment and Torque Critical...")

It is an incredibly stiff pan. It would have been much cheaper to punch one out of sheet metal.

Even the pressed steel parts bolted into some of the pans - i.e. the F Body oil return tray, are heavy duty items, much thicker and stiffer than they need to be to simply return oil. Cast in ribs are solid too. All a result of the FEA modelling they do on designs these days to get maximum strength and stiffness from minimum metal, weight, and cost.
rsz288 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2008, 11:20 PM   #49
Teching In
 
LH6-DOD-54-GMC's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sonora, CA
Posts: 9
Default LH6 DoD Pan

I posted a question in the Gen IV section regarding the special oil pressure regulator installed in DoD/AFM 5.3 engines. Can I get a little help? Would truly appreciate it. I gotta wife who would love to hear her engine fire but this is a big stumbling block.
LH6-DOD-54-GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 08:12 PM   #50
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edgerton, Ks
Posts: 92
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinYukon View Post
Thanks, Rick.

I'm guessin that part number is just the pan and not the pick up tube and other parts needed? It shows up as $96 on GMPD.

Hmmm
It included tube and tray if I remember right. I havn't got one yet...

Rick
flywheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 01:19 AM   #51
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by accental View Post
Thanks Andrew. I guess I should have looked a little closer
any info what plug is there in it?
PN would be awesome.

I got Fbody, but since I'm going with GTO pan, I'll need that sucker.
JayofDestruction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 11:52 PM   #52
TECH Regular
 
chetmo's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 10
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 405
Default

so what are iour options for fbody guys, will the caddy pan work?
__________________
-2003 50th ann. Corvette Z06
-Halltech Intake,c6 Z06 chrome rims..for now

-1998 pontiac firebird formula SOLD
347, H/C/I stalled A4, full umi suspension
10.82@128 1.62 60ft
chetmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 12:31 AM   #53
TECH Senior Member
 
JasonWW's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hou. TX.
Posts: 6,416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chetmo View Post
so what are iour options for fbody guys, will the caddy pan work?
I know it will hang below the K-member about an inch, but I'm not sure about the front. It's deeper so it may or may not touch the k-member.
__________________
Qoute from 99345hp "Hell yeah Jason, tear that thing apart."
I do unique mods for the hell of it, so don't question my reasons.

The 99 TA is now riding on airbags front and rear for only $335. More parts to be added later. Install Thread

Super Low Project (plus other links)
JasonWW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 04:18 AM   #54
TECH Apprentice
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Right here, right now!
Posts: 372
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LH6-DOD-54-GMC View Post
I posted a question in the Gen IV section regarding the special oil pressure regulator installed in DoD/AFM 5.3 engines. Can I get a little help? Would truly appreciate it. I gotta wife who would love to hear her engine fire but this is a big stumbling block.
Did you get an answer on this?

FYI - DOD pressure regulator in a GTO style pan for Holden DOD equipped motor (though DOD not used).

lsx-oil-pans-dod-pressure-regulator.jpg

It regulates pressure to the top end of the motor to 55-75 psi. (including cam and main bearings.)

Can only deduce that this is due to higher volume oil pump being fitted for DOD, and the pressure limits on the DOD valves when closed dictate regulation to 55-75psi, but need the increased flow when opening.

If you never get over 75psi, then no real issue....except for those frozen mornings....next winter.....

That is 3 pressure regs/reliefs in one engine...oil pump reg, DOD reg, filter bypass reg.

Trust this helps.
rsz288 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 10:50 AM   #55
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 39
Default

for b-body guy.............
I want to do LSX swap for my impala SS 1996
which is best ??
thanks for help
festo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 10:19 PM   #56
TECH Senior Member
 
JasonWW's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hou. TX.
Posts: 6,416
Default

Someone needs to change the Cadillac CTS pan info. Mine measures 6 3/4" total height. The picture shows 5 1/2" which we all should realize is wrong.

Corrected picture is below.
Attached Thumbnails
lsx-oil-pans-ctsvoilpan-1-corrected.jpg  
__________________
Qoute from 99345hp "Hell yeah Jason, tear that thing apart."
I do unique mods for the hell of it, so don't question my reasons.

The 99 TA is now riding on airbags front and rear for only $335. More parts to be added later. Install Thread

Super Low Project (plus other links)

Last edited by JasonWW; 05-20-2008 at 10:26 PM..
JasonWW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 11:16 AM   #57
Teching In
 
LH6-DOD-54-GMC's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sonora, CA
Posts: 9
Default

For the DoD it looks as if I'll just have to install the threaded oil pressure relief valve (nearly identical to the GTO above) into the truck pan at the location shown in the photo. A little machining of a flat surface, drilling and tapping and I should be good.
lsx-oil-pans-dod-pan-swap.jpg
LH6-DOD-54-GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2008, 04:52 AM   #58
On The Tree
 
ssvolvo's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: great white northeast
Posts: 144
Default

I used an F-body pan in my LH6 Volvo. I NEVBER even gave that valve a second look. Have had NO issues with too much oil pressure. I'm sure on a very cold morning it could be a problem. The OTHER thing you could do is lower the RPM vs. COLD engine temp when you reflash the ECM to limit the engine RPM until the oil warms up. {B5203} in EFIlive.
ssvolvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 07:33 AM   #59
Teching In
 
Instigator's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: cinci oh
Posts: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chetmo View Post
so what are iour options for fbody guys, will the caddy pan work?
The caddy pan works. The drain plug moves to the rear but you can access it, at least on my M6. I swapped the oil filter tube over from my f-body pan and can still use the "big" filter. You will need the CTS tube and dipstick for correct oil level readings.

diptick - 12584737
tube - 12584738
__________________
1999 Trans Am M6 Mecham/Custom Paint Click for website
F1A boosted LSX 428, All of the parts HERE
Instigator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 05:41 PM   #60
lcs
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 14
Default Pan swap for an 04 5.3 Vortec

New to the Gen III motors. I'm putting one in an 89 Landcruiser and have clearance issues the pan. It's about 2 inches from the front diff. I need a shorter pan in the rear sump area and associated parts to make it all work.
lcs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
12558251, 12563918, 12563963, 12584738, 2004, 57, 89036836, ats, capacity, gto, ls, ls1, oil, pan, pans


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 PM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS