3yrs ago with 2001 z28 6-speed and morgan motorsports 229, 112lsa cam and tts longtubes and all bolt ons I made 427rwhp 389tq...I miss that car...but I have become boost addicted since...lol
__________________ --OLD NUMBERS-
99 z28 sts TURBO gt-67 M6, stock motor, no bolt-ons
Tuned by me 525rwhp 545rwtq 10psi
1992 nissan 300zxtwin turbo-getting parts for LS1 swap.
397.8HP/385FTLBS W/tr224/563/563,112lsa,full bolt ons,lid,headers full exhaust,pulley,ported tb,mass air,spec III+,moser 9inch spool,stock heads,few suspension mods,26 degrees total advance. Thought that was really good for such a small cam. It was tuned by Finish line performance in Naperville, Ill.
Heres a few to add: (All nummbers are on our 1100SE)
Our in house custom cam 400 hp/390 lbs tq (little less dur. then F13/Torquer 2)
2000 car, LS6 intake, unported TB, jethots thru cutout No track times yet
Choppin old 226 cam 387 hp/372 lbs tq
99 car, 78 LSX, ported TB, Jethots through cutout (4 less through catback)
these exact same parts (cam/headers/catback) in another 6 speed car ran 11.50 @ 120
Aaron are those number on an actual dynojet, or the simulation fudge thing on the Mustang? We had a customer with a 350Z go from our dyno (265 hp) to a dynojet a few days later and it made 19 hp and 26 lbs tq more on the DJet
Aaron are those number on an actual dynojet, or the simulation fudge thing on the Mustang? We had a customer with a 350Z go from our dyno (265 hp) to a dynojet a few days later and it made 19 hp and 26 lbs tq more on the DJet
They did the correction factor, whatever it was. 19hp and 26lbs is pretty pimp, do you think theres a universal correction factor (example-mustang HP x 1.02 = dynojet HP)?
And do you think higher HP car would lose more HP percentage-wise than a lesser HP car?
I really don't get this, but I put down 350rwhp 380rwtq with a Hot Cam, Changed to a TH350 and Trex Cam and put down 336rwhp and 471rwtq? And went from a TCI 3200 converter to a Vigilante 4000 stall. The rest of mods in sign.
They did the correction factor, whatever it was. 19hp and 26lbs is pretty pimp, do you think theres a universal correction factor (example-mustang HP x 1.02 = dynojet HP)?
And do you think higher HP car would lose more HP percentage-wise than a lesser HP car?
Definitely is going to vary between Mustang dynos, there are a million different variables to calibrate in right, and its pretty easy to miss one. Thats why we spent a full day calibrating rechecking and going back over a everything with ours to make sure it was spot on with Mustangs readings
Heres a graph of the three cars I posted about if anyone is interested in the curves
525rwhp 545rwtq 10psi
