Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Dynamometer Results & Comparisons
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-03-2005, 12:11 AM   #1
Banned
 
Trader Rating: 12
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: So Cal, CA
Posts: 179
Default AFR 205 vs ET peformance heads, picked up 22 rwhp

A friend of mine just did a head swap on his 00 SS camaro. I went down and checked out the dyno pulls today and had great results.

224/230 cam, LS6, ported TB, Longtubes, M6, pulley, stock rockers, stock bottom end.

The ET heads were going on another friends car, but let him do the swap for comparisons sake.

Both cars will dynoed on the same dyno and tuned with HP tuners to peak performance. Same compression CC on the heads.

AFR 205's: 423 rwhp
ET Peformance 215: 445 rwhp

Comparable torque #'s...

Pretty cool considering they cost close to the same...I know A&A Corvette is no longer stocking AFR's anymore and have switched over to ET heads unless specifically asked for by customers
VTESPEED is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 01:45 AM   #2
TECH Fanatic
 
LSUxBlake's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,111
Send a message via AIM to LSUxBlake
Default

wait......... you mean AFR's aren't THE end all of heads for the LS1?

Jeez, who woulda thought?
__________________
2003 GMC Sierra 4.8
LSUxBlake is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 04:56 AM   #3
TECH Senior Member
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 5,169
Default

Can you post the curves, it would be interesting to see the lower RPM portion.
vettenuts is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 11:10 AM   #4
TECH Fanatic
 
STRIPSTAR's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Phila, Pennsyltucky
Posts: 1,524
Default

445 whp without a 90/90 and a reasonable cam is great.
__________________
2000 SS
2009 Silverado
STRIPSTAR is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 11:53 AM   #5
SSU Moderator
 
RyanJ's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 4,795
Send a message via AIM to RyanJ
Default

I'd like to see the curves if you can post the graphs. If not, can you give an idea of what HP/TQ was at like 3k, 4k, 5k, 6k, and 7k? And just to reiterate, these are the ETP 11-degree heads right?
RyanJ is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 12:05 PM   #6
TECH Senior Member
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 5,169
Default

Wouldn't there also be a considerable difference in CR as well, since the ET's have a 58 cc chamber?
vettenuts is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 12:15 PM   #7
TECH Fanatic
 
Silver-Dollar's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 1,107
Default

Wouldnt the runner sizes make a difference, 205 vs. 215? Not trying to defend, just asking.
__________________
'03 RCSB LQ9|TSP224R 112|Underdrive pulleys|SLP 160 Tstat|AS&M Headers|Gibson Super Truck|K&N|Strange 4.10s w/ g80|SST3200|Performabuilt L2|www.v8muscle.net|LineX
Silver-Dollar is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 01:20 PM   #8
10 Second Club
 
02SOMWS6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wallkill ,NY
Posts: 2,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver-Dollar
Wouldnt the runner sizes make a difference, 205 vs. 215? Not trying to defend, just asking.
I agree, not fair comparrison cause they are not the same size head. Put a milled down AFR 225 against the 215.
__________________
Best track time-10.5 @ 130 with a 1.45 60ft.
Slowhawk tuned 473rwhp 407rwtq
10.6 pass http://video.ls1tech.com/video/f345e...3b0126a3be.htm
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/b...3b012749e1.htmhttp:/
GM hightech shootout photo's
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com..._trans_am.html
NBM 2000 convertable-under construction-6.0L
02SOMWS6 is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 01:50 PM   #9
TECH Junkie
 
Ben R's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,727
Send a message via AIM to Ben R
Default

The ETP heads really are something special.
Ben R is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 01:56 PM   #10
9 Second Club
 
eb02z06@ChampionMotors's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 16
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 2,188
Default

So your saying my car could be making 461 with a 224/228 cam-That would be great but I don't think it's possible.
__________________
HOME OF CANADA'S FASTEST STREET DRIVEN C5's.
FI Specialists, TTix, Procharger, Paxton, Vortech
TTix C5-9.7@157-pump gas
Vortech YSi C5 9.1@155 pump gas

CHAMPION MOTORS
416-751-8047
eb02z06@ChampionMotors is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 02:00 PM   #11
On The Tree
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 174
Default

Q since the ET's have a 58 cc chamber?

A Our Heads can be ordered in a smaller chamber size if wanted. This test was "Same compression CC on the heads".


Q Wouldnt the runner sizes make a difference, 205 vs. 215?
Q I agree, not fair comparrison cause they are not the same size head.

A If runner sizes, this small, where to be a huge effect from a 205 to 215, then there would be a trade off for low end torque to upper end horsepower. But a comparison such as this is equal due to that these are both our smaller street heads.

Q Put a milled down AFR 225 against the 215.

A Why not do a ETP 225's to AFR 225's? That is more a equal comparison.
Craig@ETPerformance is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 02:15 PM   #12
TECH Fanatic
 
LSUxBlake's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,111
Send a message via AIM to LSUxBlake
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig@ETPerformance
Q since the ET's have a 58 cc chamber?

A Our Heads can be ordered in a smaller chamber size if wanted. This test was "Same compression CC on the heads".


Q Wouldnt the runner sizes make a difference, 205 vs. 215?
Q I agree, not fair comparrison cause they are not the same size head.

A If runner sizes, this small, where to be a huge effect from a 205 to 215, then there would be a trade off for low end torque to upper end horsepower. But a comparison such as this is equal due to that these are both our smaller street heads.

Q Put a milled down AFR 225 against the 215.

A Why not do a ETP 225's to AFR 225's? That is more a equal comparison.


Very impressive #'s Craig, I may look into a set of 225's for my 408 in a few months.
__________________
2003 GMC Sierra 4.8
LSUxBlake is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 02:21 PM   #13
Banned
 
Nate_Taufer's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North of Seattle
Posts: 2,065
Default

One thing a lot of people on here forget is that the ETP heads are an 11 degree design. Due to simple math the ETP design 215's will have less cross sectional area to a 15 degree head with a 215 cc runner. It's really comparing apples to oranges.

The ETP heads are an amazing product and I personally wouldn't reccomend anything but them if the budget is in place.

Plus you get added p-v clearance just from the fact that they are an 11 degree design. A huge benefit for a lot of guys not wanting to flycut.

Nate
Nate_Taufer is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 02:27 PM   #14
TECH Veteran
 
DopeFedZ's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 23
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 4,305
Default

I saw a set of ET's 265 heads at LME and they look awesome. Those are what I will be running on my solid roller 408.
__________________
-CARLOS-

[My FQuick Garage] - [High Resolution Pictures]
[Exhaust Clip] - [Track Run]
DopeFedZ is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 03:53 PM   #15
TECH Senior Member
 
Brandon Boomhauer's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 10
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Gainesville, Denton TX
Posts: 8,783
Send a message via ICQ to Brandon Boomhauer Send a message via AIM to Brandon Boomhauer Send a message via MSN to Brandon Boomhauer Send a message via Yahoo to Brandon Boomhauer
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate_Taufer
One thing a lot of people on here forget is that the ETP heads are an 11 degree design. Due to simple math the ETP design 215's will have less cross sectional area to a 15 degree head with a 215 cc runner. It's really comparing apples to oranges.

The ETP heads are an amazing product and I personally wouldn't reccomend anything but them if the budget is in place.

Plus you get added p-v clearance just from the fact that they are an 11 degree design. A huge benefit for a lot of guys not wanting to flycut.

Nate
Exactly. The cross sectional area is smaller, even on their 225s to a 225 AFR'd head.
Match cross sectional area, oh my!
Its a less than fair comparison, with "numbers" going towards AFR, however the ET heads out performed them.
Please, if at all possible post a graph, I'm guessing that the lower end will be greater too.
__________________
2006 Sierra Crew Z71 - FOR SALE
http://www.grassfire.org/
http://www.imwithfred.com/
Brandon Boomhauer is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 05:27 PM   #16
Louis @ LGM
 
Louis's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Frisco/Wylie
Posts: 3,831
Default

Interesting. Id like to see the graph. peak numbers really dont tell the whole story.
Louis is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 05:51 PM   #17
TECH Fanatic
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,924
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis
Interesting. Id like to see the graph. peak numbers really dont tell the whole story.

SideStep is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 06:23 PM   #18
Banned
 
Nate_Taufer's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North of Seattle
Posts: 2,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon
Exactly. The cross sectional area is smaller, even on their 225s to a 225 AFR'd head.
Match cross sectional area, oh my!
Its a less than fair comparison, with "numbers" going towards AFR, however the ET heads out performed them.
Please, if at all possible post a graph, I'm guessing that the lower end will be greater too.

I would say so too. The AFR's are great heads, but you have to realize that cross sectional area is the most overlooked topic when it comes to heads. AFR actually has more cross sectional area on 205 cc runner on a 15 degree head than the 215 cc ETP heads.

These ETP heads are just engineered to make power everywhere and that's what they do.
Nate_Taufer is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 06:38 PM   #19
TECH Fanatic
 
destroyerSS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Orange county n.y.
Posts: 1,109
Default

Just want to make sure i'm clear on this. The car had AFR's then they switched to the ET head? Or is this 2 seperate cars with different heads?? And if it was the same car that swapped heads was the car dyno'ed the same day. Or was the car dyno'ed before. Thanks
__________________
98SS M6 LME 408,AFR225'sW/manley nextek's,CM253/257 643-645 112,Crane lifters,Comp_hi-techPR,LSX90,NW90TB,JesselSS,Kook's 1 3/4-1 7/8 race headers,SVO42lb,TSP-Xpipe,TSP_85mmlid,SLP85maf,Racetronix,MTI pulley,Taylor 10.4mm,B+M ripper,4.10's,Spohn adj CM T/A & LCA re-lo brackets,Hotchkis LCA's,subframes,strut mount,panhard bar&HD sway bars,BMR panhard brace,Poly trans mount,Eibach springs,Luk Pro-Gold clutch,Ram adj M/C,Aluminum flywheel,Nitto's,Slowhawk tuned
destroyerSS is offline  
Old 11-03-2005, 08:43 PM   #20
TECH Apprentice
 
J&J Speed Shop's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 8
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Western New York
Posts: 353
Send a message via AIM to J&J Speed Shop Send a message via MSN to J&J Speed Shop
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis
Interesting. Id like to see the graph. peak numbers really dont tell the whole story.
area under the curve > peak power. Post the graph
J&J Speed Shop is offline  
Closed Thread

Tags
205, 225, 408, afr, area, cc, chamber, competition, cross, etp, heads, horsepower, newest, performance, sectional


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 PM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS