<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[LS1TECH - Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></title>
		<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums</link>
		<description>Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:30:50 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The "Do I need a tune" question]]></title>
			<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1207167-do-i-need-tune-question.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Here is a result I've found many time throughout the years.The biggest question is why get a tune with minimul bolt-ons? Well,sometimes tuning will give more power gains that alot of the bolt-ons you buy and for a cheaper cost. 
 
Car in question - 125k miles,M6, 98 Z28. Has a flowmaster...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Here is a result I've found many time throughout the years.The biggest question is why get a tune with minimul bolt-ons? Well,sometimes tuning will give more power gains that alot of the bolt-ons you buy and for a cheaper cost.<br />
<br />
Car in question - 125k miles,M6, 98 Z28. Has a flowmaster muffler,air lid and a  Jet chip.Car ran fine.<br />
<br />
Drove the car to get up to temp. All runs where at 190-192 engine temp at start of the runs.They were all logged for KR and A/F.<br />
<br />
As it came in.Did 3 runs with cooldown inbetween.All runs were very close to each other with the highest at 300hp/276tq. No KR and A/F stayed around 12.7-1. I was thinking the Jet chip was doing pretty good.<br />
<br />
Took out the chip and street tuned the car.After about 20 minutes on the street we hit the dyno again.Took 2 runs to get the WOT A/F and timing in check.<br />
<br />
Cooled car to the proper temp and did 3 runs that way. Car made consistant power within 1% of each other.Final #'s were 316hp/300tq. This was with 4 degree's less timing than before and a slightly richer A/F around 12.5-1.<br />
<br />
Made a great gain across the whole curve.Here's the graph.<br />
<br />
Just figured I'd share this.It surprised me on the gain.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:5px">

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Thumbnails</legend>
			<div style="padding:3px">
			
<a href="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/attachments/dynamometer-results-comparisons/206638d1258726671-do-i-need-tune-question-98-z.jpg" rel="Lightbox" id="attachment206638" target="_blank"><img class="thumbnail" src="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/attachments/dynamometer-results-comparisons/206638d1258726671t-do-i-need-tune-question-98-z.jpg" border="0" alt="Click image for larger version

Name:	98 Z.JPG
Views:	N/A
Size:	136.6 KB
ID:	206638" /></a>
&nbsp;

			</div>
		</fieldset>
	

	

	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/"><![CDATA[Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Slowhawk</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1207167-do-i-need-tune-question.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>G-Force 2010 Camaro L99 #2 TVS 2300 Results</title>
			<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1206900-g-force-2010-camaro-l99-2-tvs-2300-results.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:04:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>This is the 3rd TVS 2010 Camaro we have completed this week! We are going 2010 Camaro Crazy! 
 
*Check our website for tons of pics and videos of all our latest projects!* 
 
                  *WWW.GFORCE-TX.COM* 
 
*2010 Camaro SS RS L99* 
 
* Magnacharger TVS 2300 @ 8psi 
* SW Headers with Cats</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>This is the 3rd TVS 2010 Camaro we have completed this week! We are going 2010 Camaro Crazy!<br />
<br />
<b>Check our website for tons of pics and videos of all our latest projects!</b><br />
<br />
                  <font color="Blue"><b><a href="http://WWW.GFORCE-TX.COM" target="_blank">WWW.GFORCE-TX.COM</a></b></font><br />
<br />
<b>2010 Camaro SS RS L99</b><br />
<ul><li>Magnacharger TVS 2300 @ 8psi</li>
<li>SW Headers with Cats</li>
<li>SW 3&quot; Catback Exhaust</li>
<li><b>STOCK AIRBOX!!!</b></li>
<li>G-Force Custom Dyno Tune</li>
</ul><br />
<font color="Red"><b><font size="5">490 RWHP<br />
514 RWTQ</font></b></font><br />
<br />
<img src="http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww285/GFORCEROBERT/nickj2010.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/"><![CDATA[Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Mike TexaSS</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1206900-g-force-2010-camaro-l99-2-tvs-2300-results.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>I could use some opinions on my numbers.</title>
			<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1206722-i-could-use-some-opinions-my-numbers.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:59:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I just had my car dynoed on a dynojet that generally sees stock LS1 autos put down 290-295 with stock converter. 
 
 
Earlier 346 numbers I felt were low... 
3200 converter 
cam 230/234 .595/.598 114 
Bolt-ons etc.- 
 
343 rwhp 
330 rwtq at 4800 to negate converter flash</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I just had my car dynoed on a dynojet that generally sees stock LS1 autos put down 290-295 with stock converter.<br />
<br />
<br />
Earlier 346 numbers I felt were low...<br />
3200 converter<br />
cam 230/234 .595/.598 114<br />
Bolt-ons etc.-<br />
<br />
343 rwhp<br />
330 rwtq at 4800 to negate converter flash<br />
<br />
<br />
Only changes...<br />
384CI<br />
heads - 317 castings 315/220 flow<br />
<br />
357 rwhp<br />
352 rwtq at 4800 to negate converter flash<br />
<br />
<br />
Horsepower gains were about expected as all that changed to affect them is the heads. Torque is consistently 25 higher, and even hits 33 higher for a brief time. The gains were both expected, but the overall numbers with both setups worry me. I just see so much bigger numbers with other similar setups in terms of rwhp.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/"><![CDATA[Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></category>
			<dc:creator>transsam</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1206722-i-could-use-some-opinions-my-numbers.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>G-Force CAM ONLY C6 Z06 Dyno and Vid</title>
			<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1206515-g-force-cam-only-c6-z06-dyno-vid.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:35:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I had a customer who wanted only a camshaft in his stock 2008 C6 Z06. I was shocked by the results! 
 
*2008 C6 Z06* 
 
*100% STOCK except* 
 
* Haltech Cold Air Intake 
* G-Force Stg II Cam Kit 
* G-Force Custom Dyno Tune</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I had a customer who wanted only a camshaft in his stock 2008 C6 Z06. I was shocked by the results!<br />
<br />
<b><font color="Red">2008 C6 Z06</font></b><br />
<br />
<b><font size="5">100% STOCK except</font></b><br />
<ul><li>Haltech Cold Air Intake</li>
<li>G-Force Stg II Cam Kit</li>
<li>G-Force Custom Dyno Tune</li>
</ul><br />
<b><font size="5">532 RWHP<br />
472 RWTQ</font></b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxno2OAQDf0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxno2OAQDf0</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<img src="http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww285/GFORCEROBERT/Brucestg2cam.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/"><![CDATA[Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Mike TexaSS</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1206515-g-force-cam-only-c6-z06-dyno-vid.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[American Racing 1 7/8" headers, tune add 50rwhp to 2009 G8 GT]]></title>
			<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1206127-american-racing-1-7-8-headers-tune-add-50rwhp-2009-g8-gt.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:43:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Very impressive results from just adding headers. For those who have a hard time reading the results, here's how it went: 
 
Baseline with Vararam CAI, muffler delete, stock tune: *320rwhp/341rwtq* See the bottom curve in the graph comparison for baseline numbers. 
Image:...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Very impressive results from just adding headers. For those who have a hard time reading the results, here's how it went:<br />
<br />
Baseline with Vararam CAI, muffler delete, stock tune: <b>320rwhp/341rwtq</b> See the bottom curve in the graph comparison for baseline numbers.<br />
<img src="http://guerragroup.com/Nathan_G8.JPG" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Added ARH 1 7/8&quot; long tube headers, stock tune: <b>354rwhp/363rwtq</b> (a gain of 34/22 from headers alone). The bottom curve is the graph with headers and no tune. The top graph is after the tune.<br />
<img src="http://guerragroup.com/Nathan_G8_2.JPG" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Added EFI Live dyno tune: <b>370rwhp/383rwtq</b> (a gain from tune of 16/20 from the tune)<br />
<img src="http://guerragroup.com/Nathan_G8_1.JPG" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Total gain for headers and dyno tune: <b>50rwhp/42rwtq</b><br />
Hats off to American Racing Headers for making an outstanding product. The 1 7/8&quot; headers lose nothing to 1 3/4&quot; headers down low, but gain at higher rpm. On a hotter 6.2L G8 GXP, the gains would be even larger.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://nathanfajkus.com/headers_1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://nathanfajkus.com/headers_2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://nathanfajkus.com/headers_3.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wI8wsDwYuhw&amp;feature=player_embedded" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wI8ws...layer_embedded</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/"><![CDATA[Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Patrick G</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1206127-american-racing-1-7-8-headers-tune-add-50rwhp-2009-g8-gt.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Locking The TCC When On Dyno</title>
			<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205955-locking-tcc-when-dyno.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:18:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I've tried searching this, 
The only thread that was close lasted less than six posts and dealt more with English grammar than the title suggested. 
 
Is there anyone who knows and has experience how to lock-up the TCC on an A4 car with the 4L60/65. So that the dyno run can be done from say 2,500...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I've tried searching this,<br />
The only thread that was close lasted less than six posts and dealt more with English grammar than the title suggested.<br />
<br />
Is there anyone who knows and has experience how to lock-up the TCC on an A4 car with the 4L60/65. So that the dyno run can be done from say 2,500 up with it locked-up in 3rd gear and the 3&gt;2 T.P. kick-down and 3&gt;2 down-shift speed parameters inhibited?<br />
<br />
I use EFI-Live so would be interested if any EFI-L users can confirm what I have attempted to understand, as I'm an M6 user just trying to be helpful for others.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/"><![CDATA[Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Sid447</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205955-locking-tcc-when-dyno.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>G-Force 2010 Camaro w TVS 2300 Results</title>
			<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205727-g-force-2010-camaro-w-tvs-2300-results.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:49:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[We finished up a really nice 2010 this morning!  
 
* 
2010 Camaro RS SS (LS3)* 
 
* Magnacharger TVS 2300 @ 8 PSI 
* *STOCK AIRBOX!* 
* SW Longtube Headers 
* SW 3" Catback 
* G-Force Custom Tune]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>We finished up a really nice 2010 this morning! <br />
<br />
<b><br />
2010 Camaro RS SS (LS3)</b><br />
<ul><li>Magnacharger TVS 2300 @ 8 PSI</li>
<li><b>STOCK AIRBOX!</b></li>
<li>SW Longtube Headers</li>
<li>SW 3&quot; Catback</li>
<li>G-Force Custom Tune</li>
</ul><br />
<b>580 RWHP<br />
560 RWTQ</b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6c_oYTwRbbA" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6c_oYTwRbbA</a><br />
<br />
<img src="http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww285/GFORCEROBERT/Sotiorus.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/"><![CDATA[Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Mike TexaSS</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205727-g-force-2010-camaro-w-tvs-2300-results.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>G-Force 2010 GT500 = 770 RWHP!</title>
			<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205715-g-force-2010-gt500-770-rwhp.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:26:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Just finished up another round of mods to Tj's 2010 GT500. 
 
*2010 Shelby GT500* 
 
* Kenne Bell 2.8H Mammoth @ 22 PSI 
* Off Road X-pipe 
* Ford Racing Stinger Cat Back 
* SCT Tune 
* Dyno Tech 1 Piece Driveshaft]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Just finished up another round of mods to Tj's 2010 GT500.<br />
<br />
<b>2010 Shelby GT500</b><br />
<ul><li>Kenne Bell 2.8H Mammoth @ 22 PSI</li>
<li>Off Road X-pipe</li>
<li>Ford Racing Stinger Cat Back</li>
<li>SCT Tune</li>
<li>Dyno Tech 1 Piece Driveshaft</li>
</ul><br />
<b>770 RWHP<br />
712 RWTQ</b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBk6O8SrW2E" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBk6O8SrW2E</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/"><![CDATA[Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Mike TexaSS</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205715-g-force-2010-gt500-770-rwhp.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>G-Force F-1C Procharged Z06 Results!</title>
			<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205706-g-force-f-1c-procharged-z06-results.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:09:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Just finished up another F-1C Procharger combo.   
 
* 
2002 C5 Z06* 
 
* HKE 346 LS6 9:1 compression 
* Stock 317 Heads 
* 238/242 Cam 
* Procharger F-1C w 8-rib @ 16 PSI 
* Meth Injection</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Just finished up another F-1C Procharger combo.  <br />
<br />
<b><br />
2002 C5 Z06</b><br />
<ul><li>HKE 346 LS6 9:1 compression</li>
<li>Stock 317 Heads</li>
<li>238/242 Cam</li>
<li>Procharger F-1C w 8-rib @ 16 PSI</li>
<li>Meth Injection</li>
<li>G-Force 2 Bar CLSD Tune</li>
</ul><br />
<b>803 RWHP 677 RWTQ</b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE5fshlBNNQ" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE5fshlBNNQ</a><br />
<br />
<img src="http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww285/GFORCEROBERT/bigmarc.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/"><![CDATA[Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Mike TexaSS</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205706-g-force-f-1c-procharged-z06-results.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>1969 Camaro w 427 LSX and TVS 2300 Blower Results!</title>
			<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205696-1969-camaro-w-427-lsx-tvs-2300-blower-results.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:49:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>We just finished up a really cool project! Big thanks to LME for building a great power combo and introducing us to this customer! 
 
*1969 Camaro * 
 
* LME 427 LSX Block 9:5:1 compression 
* Trick Flow 235cc 6 bolt heads 
* Very Small Blower Grind Camshaft 
* Magnacharger TVS 2300 with Cog @ 10...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>We just finished up a really cool project! Big thanks to LME for building a great power combo and introducing us to this customer!<br />
<br />
<b>1969 Camaro </b><br />
<ul><li>LME 427 LSX Block 9:5:1 compression</li>
<li>Trick Flow 235cc 6 bolt heads</li>
<li>Very Small Blower Grind Camshaft</li>
<li>Magnacharger TVS 2300 with Cog @ 10 PSI</li>
<li>T-56 Trans</li>
<li>Spec P-Trim Dual Disc Clutch</li>
<li>Moser 12 bolt w 4.10 Gears</li>
<li>G-Force Custom 2 Bar CLSD Tune</li>
<li>G-Force Custom Magnafuel Fuel System</li>
</ul><br />
<b>710 RWHP 725 RWTQ</b><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9rd5M4PRG0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9rd5M4PRG0</a><br />
<br />
<img src="http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww285/GFORCEROBERT/1969.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/"><![CDATA[Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Mike TexaSS</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205696-1969-camaro-w-427-lsx-tvs-2300-blower-results.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>need help with head n cam car</title>
			<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205427-need-help-head-n-cam-car.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 03:25:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>i need your help with deciding a head n cam package  
ive looked around for weeks and im no farther than i was to start there are so many choices 
im hoping if i tell you guys what i want then u can lead my to the right direction 
i do like the texas speed prc stage 2.5 5.3 heads for the money but...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>i need your help with deciding a head n cam package <br />
ive looked around for weeks and im no farther than i was to start there are so many choices<br />
im hoping if i tell you guys what i want then u can lead my to the right direction<br />
i do like the texas speed prc stage 2.5 5.3 heads for the money but cannot decide on a cam<br />
basically id like to make 425 rwhp and i dont want to have to flycut the pistons<br />
i am planning on using an ls6 intake <br />
the car will weigh about 3150 with me in it and i would like to run high 10's is that askin to much for a head/cam car <br />
please help guys</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/"><![CDATA[Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></category>
			<dc:creator>getsum27</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205427-need-help-head-n-cam-car.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA['06 GTO cam-only results...]]></title>
			<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205240-06-gto-cam-only-results.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:25:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>** Updated with dyno sheets, both Standard and SAE corrected** 
So, I have been driving around on a BUSTED tranny for about 6 months now, and took the car down to SNL to have a Tick level 2 tranny put in, along with a new clutch.  Everyone was impressed with the amount of damaged done to the...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>** Updated with dyno sheets, both Standard and SAE corrected**<br />
So, I have been driving around on a BUSTED tranny for about 6 months now, and took the car down to SNL to have a Tick level 2 tranny put in, along with a new clutch.  Everyone was impressed with the amount of damaged done to the transmission.  While it was there, Steve talked me into a new cam.<br />
<br />
The baseline dyno run was <b>395/415, with just bolt-ons</b>.  Mods included a Vararam, P&amp;P TB (by WRP), ported FAST 92, Kooks 1 3/4&quot; headers, catless mids, 3&quot; cat-back with X-pipe and 40 series Flowmasters in the '04 location, Tick level 2 T56 w/ cryo and REM polishing, lightweight flywheel, Monster level 6 clutch, and a Geforce CF driveshaft.  It was tuned by Matt @ SNL.<br />
<br />
The cam was swapped out, along with a TCI UDP, and new rails and 42# injectors, springs, pushrods, and valve seals.  The first pull on the dyno exceeded what I was hoping for - 448HP!  Matt made a few more pulls, and picked up power every time.  He was cussing my Vararam because the MAF values were all over the place.  The last run resulted in <b>467hp @ 6800rpm</b>, and <b>446ft-lbs of torque @ 4800rpm</b>.  The car made over 400ft-lbs from 3000-6000, and over 350ft-lbs from start to finish.  Due to tuning issues with the Vararam, the car is still running a little rich.  I think we are going to swap it out for one of SNL's 4&quot; CAI's.  Steve is pretty sure this will smooth it out and pick up a few more HP.<br />
<br />
So, unless someone can prove otherwise, I believe that is a record for a cam-only LS2 car.  Stock bottom end and untouched stock 243 heads.  This thing is a freak, and runs like a raped ape!  I will post up before and after dyno charts as soon as I have a digital copy of them (unless Steve wants to add to this.)<br />
<br />
Again, I have nothing but good to say about the guys at SNL (all except for Loyd - he wouldn't give me his new Harrops 2300 blower :)).  They continue to go above and beyond when it comes to customer service.  I would recommend them to anyone who is physically able to drive to DFW.  The new level 6 clutch has absolutely no chatter.  Steve said don't worry about breaking it in, just get on the highway and beat the piss out of it.  I'm not going to lie to you...  I beat on it a few times -  It's a long drive home.  I pulled off the dyno at midnight, and got home at 4:45am.<br />
<br />
Before anyone asks, you will have to get with Steve @ SNL for the cam specs - after he installs one in your car :)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cs7lSpQ62Y4" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cs7lSpQ62Y4</a><br />
<br />
<img src="http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i201/alwaysanangel805/GTOs/jparkmansae.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i201/alwaysanangel805/GTOs/jparkmanstd.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/"><![CDATA[Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></category>
			<dc:creator>hivoltagedriver</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205240-06-gto-cam-only-results.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[LE2 Stock bottom end lt1 426rwhp 393rwtq through ford 9"]]></title>
			<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205110-le2-stock-bottom-end-lt1-426rwhp-393rwtq-through-ford-9-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:39:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[so i got my rear end install finished an decided to throw the car on the local dyno. well before on the 10 bolt it did 415rwhp and 385rwtq but the was in san antonio texas. so on the ford 9" with 4.33 gears a different exhaust, TB, CAI, and New tune (email tune from pcmforless) it layed down...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>so i got my rear end install finished an decided to throw the car on the local dyno. well before on the 10 bolt it did 415rwhp and 385rwtq but the was in san antonio texas. so on the ford 9&quot; with 4.33 gears a different exhaust, TB, CAI, and New tune (email tune from pcmforless) it layed down 426rwhp @6450-6500 and 393rwtq@4000-4500. This is a stock 97 6-speed 145k mile   LT1 bottom end with full bolt ons and the LE2 kit made in 2006. <br />
<br />
when it made 415 it was on 3&quot; true duals, 58mm TB, Slp CAI with a Trickflow elbow, Stock 10 bolt with 3.42s, and a &quot;ok&quot; tune.<br />
<br />
today it made the 426 with the only things being changed was the duals cut off running dynomax bullets on the end of the collectors, AS&amp;M Monoblade TB, LS1 Lid conversion, ford 9&quot; with 4.33 gears and mini spool, and an email tune from pcmforless.<br />
<br />
now lets just say im pretty freaking happy it layed down what it did as i was expecting it to be in the 390ish area after the new 9&quot;. Not to bad for the ol LT1 car. also just recently ran the car at the track and it did 11.85@119 with a 1.76 60foot<br />
<br />
so what you guys think?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/"><![CDATA[Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></category>
			<dc:creator>c5formula</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1205110-le2-stock-bottom-end-lt1-426rwhp-393rwtq-through-ford-9-a.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>02 ls1/ 280z/ nos...</title>
			<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1204942-02-ls1-280z-nos.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:56:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>well......i dynoed the Z a while back already, here are the results....... 
na run... 
345rwhp  356tq 
 
150 wetshot... 
482rwhp   518tq 
 
just last monday i smoked my clutch on the nitrous....so a new spec3+ is on the way. should get it wednesday, then 500 mile break in....ur 
Image:...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>well......i dynoed the Z a while back already, here are the results.......<br />
na run...<br />
345rwhp  356tq<br />
<br />
150 wetshot...<br />
482rwhp   518tq<br />
<br />
just last monday i smoked my clutch on the nitrous....so a new spec3+ is on the way. should get it wednesday, then 500 mile break in....ur<br />
<img src="http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b142/240ZPRACE/zzzzzzzzzzzzz.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/"><![CDATA[Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></category>
			<dc:creator>S30LS1PWR</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1204942-02-ls1-280z-nos.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>LS1 RX7 Dyno Results</title>
			<link>http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1204879-ls1-rx7-dyno-results.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:31:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Image: http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn156/240gtr/BrandonLSFDbase.jpg  
 
Engine is from a 2001 camaro 
 
Mods are: 
Dual 2.5" into single 3" catless exhaust 
BBK Throttle Body 
Hot air intake :rotflmao: 
Some sort of tune]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img src="http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn156/240gtr/BrandonLSFDbase.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Engine is from a 2001 camaro<br />
<br />
Mods are:<br />
Dual 2.5&quot; into single 3&quot; catless exhaust<br />
BBK Throttle Body<br />
Hot air intake :rotflmao:<br />
Some sort of tune<br />
<br />
Still on the stock exhaust manifolds.<br />
<br />
Here is my graph overlaid with a C6 corvette with an intake and catback. The Vette is the faint blue line.<br />
<br />
<br />
<img src="http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn156/240gtr/LS2vsLS1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<br />
And a picture of the car:<br />
<br />
<br />
<img src="http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn156/240gtr/RX7OceanCity2-1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Brandon</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/"><![CDATA[Dynamometer Results & Comparisons]]></category>
			<dc:creator>NodnarB</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/1204879-ls1-rx7-dyno-results.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
