Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Forced Induction
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-02-2009, 12:52 PM   #21
Launching!
 
MaxxMitchell's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 8
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Shawnee KS
Posts: 224
Send a message via AIM to MaxxMitchell
Default

Its possible to do it under 5k. I spent 7k and most of my build is on here in the conversion section, and that included my Gen 3 swap, 4l80 conversion, turbo build, and buying HPTuners. I did have to stick with a cam only 5.3. I have not gotten the chance to hit the track yet as we are still waiting for warmer weather. Based off how it feels compaired to my old 10.70 set up, and playing around a couple times on the street, im guessing its very close to a 10.90-11.20 @ 122-125mph car, and I am only on 6lbs.
__________________

5.3/TC78/4l80, 1.722 60ft, 6.925 @ 104.37, 10.688 @ 130.68 on 10-11lbs
9psi - 485hp/480tq, 215/65/15 street tire best: 11.44@123 1/4mi - 8psi
MaxxMitchell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 03:04 PM   #22
TECH Regular
 
MeanYellowZ's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 10
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 471
Default

I agree that it always costs more than you think....whatever you think you are going to spend, double it. Don't be discouraged though....my beater setup is as follows:

STOCK 5.3 160k miles at time of swap $250
Car intake/ Zo6 cam-springs
NO engine mods, NO bolts, NO different heads

S475 BW turbo in my case, Master Power T70 would be a GREAT budget choice

I pushed mine to 10lbs at first and ran 132 mph in a 3140# car. The ET sucked at 10.9 but that was with a 2.1 60' since the back of the car is all stock, little 235 tires, OPEN rear, mono leafs...NO traction device whatsoever.

I then went up to 14-15lbs of boost...still same setup, still on pump gas...made the 10lbs feel like nothing, whole different beast at 14-15lbs. Im sure it would trap 135-136 like that. In a car that worked even just a little bit (like 1.75 60') that would equate to LOW ten second passes...

My same combo on 12lbs boost would last a long time for little dollars and in a halfass working car would make easy high ten second passes at best. Worst case scenario you break a piston and replace the cheap engine. It took 18lbs on pump gas to hurt my all stock one....NO meth

Have fun!
__________________
www.YatesEFI.com
MeanYellowZ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 03:06 PM   #23
TECH Regular
 
MeanYellowZ's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 10
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 471
Default

also wanted to add that I drove my car from May-October last year, including 1 month of driving AFTER the piston had lost some of the ring land. I drove it on a few trips over an hour each way, including one the next day after I had it at the track. It NEVER made a trip without seeing 10-14lbs of boost. I beat it day in and day out and drove it to work daily.
__________________
www.YatesEFI.com
MeanYellowZ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 03:28 PM   #24
TECH Fanatic
1972 Chevrolet Nova
My Garage
 
pwrtrip75's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 1,193
Send a message via AIM to pwrtrip75
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daturbosix View Post
please pm me that ebaystore that has those injectors.
New Era Performance is a sponsor on here he will match the ebay prices. He did for me.
http://www.neweraperformanceparts.com/
__________________
99 Transam - 5.3L w/ GT45 -10.76 @ 128 w/ 1.83 60ft and broke something.
99 Vette FRC - stock
72 Nova -New twin setup in the works. (former turbo 5.3)
pwrtrip75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 04:52 PM   #25
TECH Regular
 
ItsNotStock's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 21
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Billings, Montana
Posts: 433
Default

I wasn't saying it can't be done. I have known a few people to put boost to stock engines. One was a turbo'd Silverado SS (8psi). The other was a Maggied GTO (12psi). Both ran for about a year but had piston failures. You can make great power out of stock engines. But the point I was trying to get across was that cheap and longevity do not go hand in hand. I would rather build it right the first time than rebuild it multiple times because I was too impatient to save up for a proper setup.
ItsNotStock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 06:00 PM   #26
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 60
Send a message via AIM to daturbosix
Default

for the price i can get 5.3s i will keep swapping them. i can sell the parts off a blown up 5.3 and make damn near what i need to get another one.
__________________

looking for wrecked LS1 cars- PM ME! cash in hand.
daturbosix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 06:43 PM   #27
10 Second Club
1989 GMC Sierra 1500
My Garage
 
ForcedInduction's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 196
Send a message via AIM to ForcedInduction
Default

I got about 10k invested in my truck. (including the price of the truck)

truck $3500
5.3 Engine with all accessories $800
LS6 cam and springs
Turbo $600
304 Stainless pipes, bends for custom turbo kit and misc flanges $600
MegaSquirt $500
wideband $300
MSD box $300
Meth injection $300
TH400 with Tbrake $700
Fuel system (dual pumps, 72 lb injectors, rails, regulator) $800
FMIC $200
Gauges $200
Driveshaft $250
Drag radials and cheapo Rims $500
Posi rear axle and girdled cover $400

just to give you an idea. That doesnt include my nitrous kit, BOV or wastegate that I already had from another project. Plus dont forget about all the nickel and dime stuff that adds up WAYYYY to fast
__________________

1989 GMC Sierra:11.97@121(without n2o) 5.3 Swap, Giffin's Performance Turbo, LS6 Cam, Nitrous, Meth, *Now with 4L80E and Stock PCM*
Build Thread: http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/forced...-3-vortec.html
Videos: http://www.youtube.com/giffinsperformance
ForcedInduction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 10:33 PM   #28
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 28
Send a message via AIM to smokin97 Send a message via Yahoo to smokin97
Default

Very Interesting. Thanks for all the info everyone. We will update as we make progress.
smokin97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 10:39 PM   #29
TECH Enthusiast
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: troy, IL
Posts: 662
Send a message via AIM to nastychevelle
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smokin97 View Post
Very Interesting. Thanks for all the info everyone. We will update as we make progress.
when its done you should bring it down to gateway sometime near STL
__________________
94 Camaro v6 now soon to be nasty

Quote:
Originally Posted by mechanix565 View Post
the reason i want twins is because i dont know how you would go about hooking up a single turbo because i have dual exhaust
nastychevelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 10:41 PM   #30
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 28
Send a message via AIM to smokin97 Send a message via Yahoo to smokin97
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nastychevelle View Post
when its done you should bring it down to gateway sometime near STL
Ill try. Its a very nice track, I was there a few years ago for Impala SS Nationals.
__________________
smokin97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 10:49 PM   #31
TECH Enthusiast
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: troy, IL
Posts: 662
Send a message via AIM to nastychevelle
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smokin97 View Post
Ill try. Its a very nice track, I was there a few years ago for Impala SS Nationals.
yah io agree its very nice hopefully ill have my boosted 5.3 in something by then (still building motor then im looking for a car lol im still a junior in high school)
__________________
94 Camaro v6 now soon to be nasty

Quote:
Originally Posted by mechanix565 View Post
the reason i want twins is because i dont know how you would go about hooking up a single turbo because i have dual exhaust
nastychevelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 10:08 PM   #32
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 28
Send a message via AIM to smokin97 Send a message via Yahoo to smokin97
Default

On another forum people have said to use 60# or greater injectors? All I have seen here have said to use the 42# from the GM 8.1L.
__________________
smokin97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 10:18 PM   #33
TECH Enthusiast
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: troy, IL
Posts: 662
Send a message via AIM to nastychevelle
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smokin97 View Post
On another forum people have said to use 60# or greater injectors? All I have seen here have said to use the 42# from the GM 8.1L.
thats just to keep it on the cheap and for 8-10lbs i think 42# should be enough
__________________
94 Camaro v6 now soon to be nasty

Quote:
Originally Posted by mechanix565 View Post
the reason i want twins is because i dont know how you would go about hooking up a single turbo because i have dual exhaust
nastychevelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 10:14 AM   #34
TECH Fanatic
1972 Chevrolet Nova
My Garage
 
pwrtrip75's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 1,193
Send a message via AIM to pwrtrip75
Default

My 42# injectors were maxed out at 10psi of boost. Base fuel pressure was 45psi and AFR's were around 11.5:1 ...42# ones are a waste of time to get I think.

I added the cost to build my entire drivetrane in my Nova...5.3L, cam, valve springs, intake, injectors, turbo and all parts for it, intercooler, HP Tuners, Wideband, rebuild my TH350, Fuel system, Coan rebuilt my converter, Pretty much everything except the rear end. around $5k. 3 years later still runs good, and there isnt a time I drive it that it isnt to the floor. Daily driven everywhere in the summer.
__________________
99 Transam - 5.3L w/ GT45 -10.76 @ 128 w/ 1.83 60ft and broke something.
99 Vette FRC - stock
72 Nova -New twin setup in the works. (former turbo 5.3)
pwrtrip75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 12:09 PM   #35
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 60
Send a message via AIM to daturbosix
Default

my question is what are you guys running for a fuel system?
__________________

looking for wrecked LS1 cars- PM ME! cash in hand.
daturbosix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 12:15 PM   #36
TECH Junkie
 
MY99TAWS6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: regina,sk.,canada
Posts: 3,802
Default

You can run a single intank racetronix pump to around 500 to maybe 600rwhp.
Go with 60s off the bat is my advice don't bother with 42s. If you want past 600rwhp then likley should go to dual intank setup like you can see on lonnies,nastys sites to name a couple. Or big single if you want to go past 1000rwhp Much past 600rwhp would also do bigger lines, rails and of course a boost referenced regulator.

I am going to twin intank with bigger lines ,rails and boost ref reg and also going to be upgrading to 79 pounders think right away. Might even have to go bigger later on will have to see.
__________________
99TAWS6"DEATH WISH" :Iron 408/Aps tt, Lingenfelter GT-7 cam,Yt 1.8s,,Afr 225, Corsa catback,Fast90 /NW90,Zex direct port, Lonnies twin pump,60's(temporary),Asp,sfcs,Kyb agx,Hotchkis lcas/stb. Bmr torque arm/relo brackets,Spohn sway bars/panhard,RPM 4l80,Yank PY3400 ,Dana 60,TTM ,C5z06 brakes, HPtuners,Street pro cutout,Eboost2,Interceptor guages.

96z28 vert,97 Talon Awd Turbo ,91 talon awd auto turbo race car .
MY99TAWS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 12:44 PM   #37
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 60
Send a message via AIM to daturbosix
Default

well i have 2 GSS walbro 340s that i was gonna loan to smokin97 for this build, and i hope that will keep up with the motor for a little while.
__________________

looking for wrecked LS1 cars- PM ME! cash in hand.
daturbosix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 01:21 PM   #38
TECH Fanatic
1972 Chevrolet Nova
My Garage
 
pwrtrip75's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 1,193
Send a message via AIM to pwrtrip75
Default

aeromotive A1000 ITS LOUD! But I guess you can submerse them so im going to try that and see if its quieter.
__________________
99 Transam - 5.3L w/ GT45 -10.76 @ 128 w/ 1.83 60ft and broke something.
99 Vette FRC - stock
72 Nova -New twin setup in the works. (former turbo 5.3)
pwrtrip75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 02:19 PM   #39
TECH Regular
 
ItsNotStock's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 21
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Billings, Montana
Posts: 433
Default

A single 340 might be good enough for the power you are looking for. Hell, two 255's are enough for 1,000. It gets pricey when you get into upgrading the lines.
Twin pumps-$200
Regulator-$160
20ft -8 $100
20ft -6$100
10 Micron filter $60
5 Micron filter $50
And that is not counting your fuel rails, cross over, fittings, or modified pump harness.
ItsNotStock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 02:20 PM   #40
TECH Regular
 
ItsNotStock's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 21
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Billings, Montana
Posts: 433
Default

And a single A1000 would do the trick, but you would have to modify your tank. Personally I wouldn't trust putting a fitting in a plastic tank. and I have heard the pump itself tends to get pretty warm with street driving. The twin in-tank pumps are more docile, and probably what you're looking for.
ItsNotStock is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 PM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS