Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Forced Induction
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-02-2009, 08:29 PM   #1
Banned
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 80
Default quater mile times

I know this is a broad question but how come it seems like blower cars make awesome power but there track times are not comparable to an all motor car that is making less power around the same weight? It just seems like to me if your making 600 + hp you should run low 10s high 9s all day. Some one please explain.
AjSmoker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 08:35 PM   #2
8 Second Club
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 17
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 8,028
Send a message via AIM to MIGHTYMOUSE
Default

a 600hp motor car is far more likely to be set up specifically for drag racing than a 600hp FI car.
__________________

David Childress MM3 8.73 ; 159.27(1.35) 3825#
BMR, TurboTech, BS3, SNOW, Visit RPM
MIGHTYMOUSE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 08:37 PM   #3
Banned
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 80
Default

what exactly does that mean do u mean more rpms and gear
AjSmoker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 08:44 PM   #4
8 Second Club
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 17
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 8,028
Send a message via AIM to MIGHTYMOUSE
Default

tires, rear, transmission/converter, suspension, safety equipment
__________________

David Childress MM3 8.73 ; 159.27(1.35) 3825#
BMR, TurboTech, BS3, SNOW, Visit RPM
MIGHTYMOUSE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 08:48 PM   #5
TECH Junkie
 
MY99TAWS6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: regina,sk.,canada
Posts: 3,810
Default

FI also generally is for lower power ranges. NA LS1 are not going to go too much past 450rwhp without starting to do some streetability tradeoffs.
Not so easy NA to get big hp that takes some form of FI. 500,600,700rwhp all pretty doable and even more up to the limits of the engine being used all doable. Now hooking that power is not always easy. As said not every FI build it optimized or built to be a quartermile car. I built my car to be all around.Sure it can run some decent times and decent to me would be low 10s or high 9s but that isn't its focus.
Mightymouse runs 8s at near 160mph yet its still pretty streetable just check out some of his videos of the car on the street.

You can go bigger cube NA of course and see bigger numbers but again eventually its easier to get the power with FI.
And there is the cool factor among others. The look on peoples faces when I fly by with the turbos spooled up.the blow offs venting ..gates dumping..or supercharger whine or nitrous purge..all music to a speed freaks ears. NA is a bit boring to me. Boost or spray never really gets old. You get used to the power of an NA build. For some reason every time my turbos spool and kick me in the ass its like the first time.

Also you cannot just look at hp numbers especially peak hp or peak trq. Area under the curve can be monstrous with FI depending on the type of FI used.That is more important to me than pure peak numbers. Of course its nice if its useable powerband not some turbo that spools up at 5000rpm .

I believe in the best of all worlds. Nothing beats a bit more displacement with a super or turbo maybe some spray on top to quck spool up the turbos and supercool things off.
__________________
99TAWS6"DEATH WISH" :Iron 408/Aps tt, Lingenfelter GT-7 cam,Yt 1.8s,,Afr 225, Corsa catback,Fast90 /NW90,Zex direct port, Lonnies twin pump,60's(temporary),Asp,sfcs,Kyb agx,Hotchkis lcas/stb. Bmr torque arm/relo brackets,Spohn sway bars/panhard,RPM 4l80,Yank PY3400 ,Dana 60,TTM ,C5z06 brakes, HPtuners,Street pro cutout,Eboost2,Interceptor guages.

96z28 vert,97 Talon Awd Turbo ,91 talon awd auto turbo race car .
MY99TAWS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 02:28 AM   #6
TECH Fanatic
2001 Chevrolet Camaro
 
MelScrilla's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,037
Default

I'm no turbo expert so dont flame me if i'm wrong but it seems like fi cars especially turbo cars use lower gears in the rear than a n/a car. If you look at the na cars most a4 guys run 3.73 and m6 guys run 4.10 atleast. but turbo cars seem like they usaully run a 3.23 or something like that. this could affect the short time on the cars and they make time up on the top end with high trap speeds.
__________________
01 Z28- Magnaflow catback, A4, 4:10's, SLP Lid, more power coming soon......

94 Integra - daily driver
MelScrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 04:19 AM   #7
TECH Enthusiast
 
TurboAv's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tonopah, AZ
Posts: 565
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MelScrilla View Post
I'm no turbo expert so dont flame me if i'm wrong but it seems like fi cars especially turbo cars use lower gears in the rear than a n/a car. If you look at the na cars most a4 guys run 3.73 and m6 guys run 4.10 atleast. but turbo cars seem like they usaully run a 3.23 or something like that. this could affect the short time on the cars and they make time up on the top end with high trap speeds.
Turbochargers like load. So numerically lower(3.07/3.23/3.42) gears are prefered to stay in boost longer and harder. If your car is a pure 1/4 mile car you will still need to gear it for what rpm you want to running through the traps at. I've got 3.46's in my GTO, but I might need to drop to 3.07's to prevent going to high in the rpm band with my TH400. I will try taller tires first, but I can only fit 28" tall.
__________________
2005 Pontiac GTO, FTI TH400 w/transbrake, FTI 3200/4200rpm stall, ported 243's, Comp 921 springs, C6 manifolds, turbo, forged ironblock 9.3:1 370.

4200lb heifer w/ 3.46 gears and 26" tires

12.21@114.13 1.82 60ft on Street Tires, 2638ft DA

Best 60' 1.78 on Sumitomo HTR Z 255/45r17's at 24 psi
TurboAv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 05:36 AM   #8
9 Second Club
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland.
Posts: 2,845
Send a message via MSN to stevieturbo Send a message via Yahoo to stevieturbo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AjSmoker View Post
I know this is a broad question but how come it seems like blower cars make awesome power but there track times are not comparable to an all motor car that is making less power around the same weight? It just seems like to me if your making 600 + hp you should run low 10s high 9s all day. Some one please explain.
ET's are mostly about traction.

Not a true reflection of a cars performance.


Dont forget, whilst the 1/4 mile is good fun.....Every single road Ive driven on has been longer, less grippy, and with a few bends on it.

So unless you are talking about drag only cars.....the question is pointless.
__________________
9.85 @ 144.75mph
190.7mph standing mile on a poorly 346 with YSi
181.9mph standing kilometre
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgWRCDtiTQ0
stevieturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 06:45 AM   #9
Launching!
1998 Chevrolet Camaro
 
ajw2500hd's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: May 2008
Location: glen rock pa
Posts: 213
Default

You will never buy that blower pussy!!! So just be happy with that tsp head/cam!!!!
__________________
1998 CAMARO LS3 M6
lg g6x3 cam only
Formato tuned "471 RWHP 451 RWTQ"
04.5 D-MAX LLY SILVERADO---EFILIVE AND MORE!!
ajw2500hd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 10:56 AM   #10
kp
8 Second Club
 
kp's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 31
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 10,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AjSmoker View Post
I know this is a broad question but how come it seems like blower cars make awesome power but there track times are not comparable to an all motor car that is making less power around the same weight? It just seems like to me if your making 600 + hp you should run low 10s high 9s all day. Some one please explain.
Thats not true really, its just a lot of people that build FI cars do it because they can have a nice driver with all the accessories (heavy) and they arent necessarily drag cars. If you build a blower car with drag racing in mind there isnt much difference really in power delivery between a centrifugal blower and a big N/A engine ET-wise. I've had both..

I ran 8.90s with a 347 and smallish F1A (9.17 @ 150 with a D1SC) with a 3300lb car that was built for drag racing. But it still had power steering/brakes and drove around like a stock car with a small cam. No big compression or giant cams or theft recovery, but while 3300lbs is a flyweight compared to a lot of the typical blower cars around its a heavyweight in the N/A drag car world..
__________________
2000 Firehawk | Kurt Urban Performance 347 | D1SC Procharger | Moser M9 | TH400 | 9.21 @ 145 1/4 | 5.80 @ 121 1/8
2009 G8 GT - stock for now but still fun to drive
kp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 11:23 AM   #11
10 Second Club
 
dschmittie1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 35
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: York, PA
Posts: 906
Send a message via AIM to dschmittie1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AjSmoker View Post
I know this is a broad question but how come it seems like blower cars make awesome power but there track times are not comparable to an all motor car that is making less power around the same weight? It just seems like to me if your making 600 + hp you should run low 10s high 9s all day. Some one please explain.

I think you might be looking at it a little too hard. You know my car and my D1 procharged car went 10.5@136 with a 10 bolt and no suspension work. Now I am out in the heat of the summer working on getting the new suspension set up and not running as fast. I think a FI car does worse in the heat than a NA car does. Also my car is heavy. last year my car weighed 3750 with me in it. I got is down to 3600 this year but that still is really heavy.

But like most people have Said FI cars are VERY streetable do very well at the track for what they weigh.
__________________
Dan 02 Silverado ECSB Corsa, CAI, E-fans, PP TB, LT headers
2001 NBM Firehawk #037 M6 Camel interior/ silver wheels 1 of 2 Check out my Firehawk
D1-SC, Forged 347, FMIC, Meth, 12psi, MWC fab9, 676rwhp, 590rwtq, 10.404@134.59mph 1.51 60'
dschmittie1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 07:59 PM   #12
TECH Fanatic
 
OUTLAWZ RACING's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: In the middle of somthin.
Posts: 1,971
Default

I went the time in my sig on a grudge match with a stang he call me out. That was the first time I ran the car at the track with the new mods on street tires. All I have is,Umi tq arm,lca's,panhard,eibach springs and a harden axel 10bolt with ukon 3.73 gears with a sixspeed. After that run I got booted because of no cage and a list of oher stuff but I built this car to be a topend runner. Oh I dusted the stang also accuse me of spraying I told him my ride is a meth addict. But from what I have been told with a good sixty on some slicks she would do a high 9' but Im not into that anymore.
__________________
760 HP 689 TQ !!! THANKS LETHAL PERFORMANCE!!!
14psi

It has begun.......

lookin for ?k + to the wheels lol
OUTLAWZ RACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 AM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS