This really makes me want to hold off on the Procharger install. I might just leave it on the floor in boxes for a while to see how this develops. I know Ed from LM Speed was looking at doing a kit with the TVS2300.
__________________
1998 Eclipse GSX. T3/T4 60trim etc... Sold
2004 STI. Sold
2001 SLP SS M6 #1509 (formerly owned by SLP) 233/239 112 LSA Cam, Boltons, Susp. SOLD 10/22/08
2003 Silver 10th Anniversary Cobra. Billetflow 2.93 upper/2lb Metco lower, O/R Prochamber, Borla Stingers, K&N FIPK, MGW Orange, Gords dual pass heat exchanger, 4 Metco billet idlers, H&R Race Springs, 19" satin black True Forged Chicanes. | 
. Its going to be hard to really compair anything without an enigne on a dyno with the blowers running the same boost, with the cost being included as well. I only did what I could see. Honestly I am a fan of the TVS. I had no intension of going over 10lbs of boost myself is why i got the maggie twice now (06 C6 & 00 SS). And just looking at those numbers the way they are even if the TVS was not optimal it still hung with it if not better till 14#'s by the numbers i got on this paper from doing all of that. Those dyno'd (much like the 'ol dyno vids, those of us who been on here long enough know what I am talking about with the old H/C debates 
) are misleading in a way but the truth is there you just gotta fish and do the math a bit 
Not to mention the fact that the TVS 1900 will be on the CTS-V coming up, and with the ZR1 getting the TVS2300 I think that says alot for itself for reliablitly and performance. It may not get the "BEST" peak HP/TQ at its max effiency but it sure as hell ain't weak.
. I would do it for free if I could get the F/I setups. I would even return them. I know do a Shop locally that has a engine dyno I could use for better controlled tests. Doubt he will let me do it for free though 
