Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > CHASSIS, SUSPENSION, APPEARANCE > Gears & Axles
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

Reply
Thread Tools
Old 08-11-2009, 07:06 PM   #41
Launching!
 
98silvertacrbn's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 29
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas where else
Posts: 271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turnin20s View Post
Ok I found this:



So basically I can use a fox body rear axle and just use 94-98 axle bearings and axles right? And then get disk brakes for a 94-98 cobra and cobra calipers and everything should work correctly??
Those pieces in the bottom of the pics are misalignment spacers i ended up not using them and used a solid 3/4x1/2x1-1/8 spacer. I used them on my custom built panhard bar.

Any 8.8 housing from a 79-98 mustang will work as long as you run 94 to 98 axles for the correct length and as far as i know all the 8.8 rebuild kits are the same 79-98. not 100 percent on the 99 and up specs i have in stalled some gears in the newer ones but no axle bearings so i dont know if they are different
98silvertacrbn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 07:17 PM   #42
Staging Lane
 
2000ramairformula's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Athens, TN
Posts: 77
Default

Does anyone on here know who it is that builds the 8.8 for the f bodies? Ive always wanted to put one of those in but if someone sells them for a decent price then i might go that way. Anybody know how i can get ahold of him? Or a price for these?
__________________
2000 RED WS6 FORMULA M6
Headers, Cam, and a Gear
2000ramairformula is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 07:20 PM   #43
TECH Resident
1995 Chevrolet Camaro
 
Turnin20s's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 7
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 999
Default

I'm not worried about a 99+ I just need to be sure about the 79-98 8.8s. But I keep seeing that the reason the newer ones were wider is to make room for the ABS reluctor rings. I don't have ABS anymore, but I don't want the rear to be 2.75" narrower per side, I'd like to stay at 2" to make getting wheels easier without spending $3k for a set LOL

I guess I'll have to join a mustang forum to ask some questions
__________________
'95 M6 Swapped Polo Green Hardtop
SRP Forged Pistons, Studded Main 355, Stock Crank & Rods W/ARP Bolts, CC306, Comp Pro Mag 1.6 RRs, Cloyes DR, Melling 10% HV Oil Pump, Moroso 7 QT Oil Pan, LE3 Heads, BBK 58mm TB, Custom 3.5" CAI, Ported Intake, Holley 36# Injectors, CSR EWP, Hooker LTs, Custom X-Pipe & 2OTL True Duals W/Magnaflow Muffler, Spec Stage 3, Pro 5.0, 4.10s, ST 1.7" Drop Springs, LS1 Brakes, Full UMI Rear Suspension, Ion Tune
Turnin20s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 10:00 PM   #44
TECH Resident
1995 Chevrolet Camaro
 
Turnin20s's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 7
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 999
Default

Rear axle housings on 79-98 cars are the same, and the axles are the only thing thats different. And I guess that the reason for that is because of the disk brakes. And I read that if you get a 94-98 rear axle with disk brakes that they also have 31 spline axles, so if I can find a housing with 31 spline axles I may try it out and see how it holds up, it really can't be any weaker than my 10 bolt
__________________
'95 M6 Swapped Polo Green Hardtop
SRP Forged Pistons, Studded Main 355, Stock Crank & Rods W/ARP Bolts, CC306, Comp Pro Mag 1.6 RRs, Cloyes DR, Melling 10% HV Oil Pump, Moroso 7 QT Oil Pan, LE3 Heads, BBK 58mm TB, Custom 3.5" CAI, Ported Intake, Holley 36# Injectors, CSR EWP, Hooker LTs, Custom X-Pipe & 2OTL True Duals W/Magnaflow Muffler, Spec Stage 3, Pro 5.0, 4.10s, ST 1.7" Drop Springs, LS1 Brakes, Full UMI Rear Suspension, Ion Tune
Turnin20s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 10:12 PM   #45
TECH Senior Member
 
Trader Rating: 6
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Orlando
Posts: 5,907
Send a message via AIM to slow
Default

94-98's should have 28 spline not 31 spline units.

The explorers have 31 spline axles stock.

Ryan
__________________
2006 Quicksilver GTO, M6 Daily Driver
1998 WS6 TA M6 Bright Red. ASC #370 -- SOLD
slow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 10:20 PM   #46
Launching!
 
98silvertacrbn's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 29
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas where else
Posts: 271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slow View Post
94-98's should have 28 spline not 31 spline units.

The explorers have 31 spline axles stock.

Ryan
True! but explorers have different length axle and offset pinion. I upgraded to 31 spline axles and carrier
98silvertacrbn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 10:23 PM   #47
Launching!
 
98silvertacrbn's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 29
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas where else
Posts: 271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turnin20s View Post
Rear axle housings on 79-98 cars are the same, and the axles are the only thing thats different. And I guess that the reason for that is because of the disk brakes. And I read that if you get a 94-98 rear axle with disk brakes that they also have 31 spline axles, so if I can find a housing with 31 spline axles I may try it out and see how it holds up, it really can't be any weaker than my 10 bolt
Yes the axle are different on the 94-98 for disk brakes and abs but those are the ones you need to run! some of the newer cobras got 31 slpine carriers on the irs
98silvertacrbn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 10:50 PM   #48
TECH Resident
1995 Chevrolet Camaro
 
Turnin20s's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 7
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 999
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 98silvertacrbn View Post
Yes the axle are different on the 94-98 for disk brakes and abs but those are the ones you need to run! some of the newer cobras got 31 slpine carriers on the irs
Jeez, everything I'm reading contridicts itself LOL

I know I need the longer axles, I just need to find the caliper brackets unless I can find a rear out of a 94+ car which I may be able to. I have to make a few calls, but I think I have everything figured out, mabye

94+ housing, hardened 31 spline axles, true trac, 4.10s and I'll be set. I have a lead on gears and install kit for about $200, but I'm going to look and see if I can find a better deal
__________________
'95 M6 Swapped Polo Green Hardtop
SRP Forged Pistons, Studded Main 355, Stock Crank & Rods W/ARP Bolts, CC306, Comp Pro Mag 1.6 RRs, Cloyes DR, Melling 10% HV Oil Pump, Moroso 7 QT Oil Pan, LE3 Heads, BBK 58mm TB, Custom 3.5" CAI, Ported Intake, Holley 36# Injectors, CSR EWP, Hooker LTs, Custom X-Pipe & 2OTL True Duals W/Magnaflow Muffler, Spec Stage 3, Pro 5.0, 4.10s, ST 1.7" Drop Springs, LS1 Brakes, Full UMI Rear Suspension, Ion Tune
Turnin20s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 09:52 AM   #49
On The Tree
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 195
Default

Hey Guys,

When i do a search on car-part for a 94 mustang differential, it comes up with parts from the mustangs, but also:

Mercury Cougar
Lincoln Mark Series
Ford thunderbird
Ford Crown Vic
Mercury Grand Marquis

When i go on a JY search, should i be looking at these cars too?????
__________________
'97 Trans-Am - H/C/I LS2/T56
'89 iroc-z - Full resto, Future Blown 347!
91ZLS6 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 10:19 AM   #50
On The Tree
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 195
Default

Also, do you have a p/n's for the Rod end/adapter peices you used?

Thanks!
__________________
'97 Trans-Am - H/C/I LS2/T56
'89 iroc-z - Full resto, Future Blown 347!
91ZLS6 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 10:48 AM   #51
Launching!
 
98silvertacrbn's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 29
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas where else
Posts: 271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 91ZLS6 View Post
Hey Guys,

When i do a search on car-part for a 94 mustang differential, it comes up with parts from the mustangs, but also:

Mercury Cougar
Lincoln Mark Series
Ford thunderbird
Ford Crown Vic
Mercury Grand Marquis

When i go on a JY search, should i be looking at these cars too?????
stick with the mustang housing only! ebay is your freind you need weld bungs and cold drawn seamless dom tubing
98silvertacrbn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 01:16 PM   #52
12 Second Club
 
Trader Rating: 12
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 94
Default

Just curious, did you have another junk 10 bolt to pull the spring perches and LCA mounts off of? Ive been dreading paying $3K for a 9"-S60 next year, maybe I'll try this route first. Im a huge fan of DIY4cheap stuff, I fabbed my own manual steering rack so this is right up my alley.
__________________
2001 SS M6
G5X3, TSP true duals, QTP HVMC LT's, ported 241's/TB, Spec 3+, 17x11 black ZR1's, !maf, Flaming river manual rack, stock 10bolt
Jenson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 02:19 PM   #53
TECH Junkie
2008 Suzuki Motorcycle
My Garage
 
bjamick's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 28
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Birmingham AL.
Posts: 3,591
Default

I've got an 8.8 right now that is for a 94+ mustang. I was going to put it in my ls1 coupe but it may make its way into my TA lol. Can you make me some of those mini ladder bar setups?
__________________
1999 Trans Am. 347 build. and a lil nitrous.
2008 Yamaha FZ1 10.0 @ 135
bjamick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 03:18 PM   #54
On The Tree
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 98silvertacrbn View Post
stick with the mustang housing only! ebay is your freind you need weld bungs and cold drawn seamless dom tubing
I am a QA1 Dealer, so i can get the parts through our store, just wanted to make sure i was getting the right parts

Wonder why it lists that those car's differentials will swap right into the mustangs.

the JY near me has about 15 mustangs, ill dig through em!
__________________
'97 Trans-Am - H/C/I LS2/T56
'89 iroc-z - Full resto, Future Blown 347!
91ZLS6 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 03:56 PM   #55
Banned
 
robsquikz28's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 76
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,272
Default

im told that many people do not run this is due to the fact that the instant center is way off and is not the best type of rear setup to do..That actually a ladder bar setup is the way to and will be much better, is this true or do you have any knowledge or proven setup yet to prove them wrong?
robsquikz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 04:07 PM   #56
12 Second Club
 
Trader Rating: 10
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 1,082
Default

Nice build man. Someone was going to try and mass-produce the 8.8 for the F-bodys, but I dont think that worked out.
LS1RedZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 05:22 PM   #57
TECH Resident
1995 Chevrolet Camaro
 
Turnin20s's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 7
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 999
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LS1RedZ View Post
Nice build man. Someone was going to try and mass-produce the 8.8 for the F-bodys, but I dont think that worked out.
He has a jig to do them and builds them, but he doesn't make very many. He is a member here and a couple of guys are running them with 0 problems. I want to do away with the TA all together so I'll be building a mini ladder bar setup. I think it will be super simple and if it doesn't work out I can always throw my old rear axle in, but I don't think that will happen.
__________________
'95 M6 Swapped Polo Green Hardtop
SRP Forged Pistons, Studded Main 355, Stock Crank & Rods W/ARP Bolts, CC306, Comp Pro Mag 1.6 RRs, Cloyes DR, Melling 10% HV Oil Pump, Moroso 7 QT Oil Pan, LE3 Heads, BBK 58mm TB, Custom 3.5" CAI, Ported Intake, Holley 36# Injectors, CSR EWP, Hooker LTs, Custom X-Pipe & 2OTL True Duals W/Magnaflow Muffler, Spec Stage 3, Pro 5.0, 4.10s, ST 1.7" Drop Springs, LS1 Brakes, Full UMI Rear Suspension, Ion Tune
Turnin20s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 08:00 PM   #58
Launching!
 
98silvertacrbn's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 29
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas where else
Posts: 271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robsquikz28 View Post
im told that many people do not run this is due to the fact that the instant center is way off and is not the best type of rear setup to do..That actually a ladder bar setup is the way to and will be much better, is this true or do you have any knowledge or proven setup yet to prove them wrong?
Ya a actual ladder bar setup would be better! but hey this is a easy way to get a strong rear in our cars and ill se how it performs at the track when i get there. I will tell you that there are thousands of cars on the track the run leaf springs and traction bars and this has to be better than that setup
98silvertacrbn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 08:04 PM   #59
Staging Lane
 
SPRAYED Z's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tampa
Posts: 85
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 98silvertacrbn View Post
Ya a actual ladder bar setup would be better! but hey this is a easy way to get a strong rear in our cars and ill se how it performs at the track when i get there. I will tell you that there are thousands of cars on the track the run leaf springs and traction bars and this has to be better than that setup

That is very true IMO.
SPRAYED Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 08:43 PM   #60
Launching!
 
98silvertacrbn's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 29
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas where else
Posts: 271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SPRAYED Z View Post
That is very true IMO.
Ya everyone puts way to much thought into marketing build what works race it
98silvertacrbn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2001, angles, axles, crown, forum, link, measurements, moser, mustang, pro, rear, setup, stars, summit, vic


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 PM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS