Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > CHASSIS, SUSPENSION, APPEARANCE > Gears & Axles
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-06-2009, 03:27 AM   #1
Teching In
 
ruble50's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 24
Default 3.73 or 4.10 gears for new 12 bolt

Im about to get a new rear end and thinking about 3.73 or 4.11.
I only drive on the freeway for an extended amount of time when I come back from school for holidays which is 235 miles away. I dont commute on a daily at all mainly just street.

Are the RPMs with 4.10 really that much higher than with 3.73 on the freeway at around 70 mph?

You guys with both 3.73 and 4.10 if you could please chime in with your expriences that would be nice.

Thank you
__________________
2000 Z28 NBM Camaro M6
K&N Intake, QTP E-cutout, ls6 intake manifold, !EGR!,

ruble50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 09:09 AM   #2
On The Tree
 
TRANS-DAD's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PASADENA,TX.
Posts: 169
Default

Hey bro. If your talkin bout the M6 camaro in your sig. then def. do tha 4.10's! 70mph is only 2000rpm's w/4.10's
__________________
[
01 WS6 VERT -KOOKS LTS,ORY , MAGNAFLOW(AND STILL SLOW)
TRANS-DAD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 10:17 AM   #3
TECH Senior Member
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 41
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Yo Momma's House, and Louisiana
Posts: 6,403
Default

4.10s for M6, 3.73s for A4
01ssreda4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 12:18 PM   #4
Teching In
 
ruble50's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 24
Default

If 4.10 are only 2K going 70 i dont know why anyone would go with 3.73 over 4.10. i think i decided on 4.10, that is not much of a difference between stock gears as far as rpms and gas mileage.

Thanks
__________________
2000 Z28 NBM Camaro M6
K&N Intake, QTP E-cutout, ls6 intake manifold, !EGR!,

ruble50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 12:23 PM   #5
12 Second Club
 
ssick1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 231
Default

so 410s would work better on a m6 for racing
__________________

spec stage 3 clutch torquer2 cam 8.5 msd wires 373 gears
ssick1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 12:32 PM   #6
TECH Enthusiast
 
Jimmard's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 10
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Newhall, CA
Posts: 733
Default

I have had both, and let me tell you, to me, the 3.73s are much muuuuuch more enjoyable. I had a 9" with 4.11s that was FUN at the track, but everywhere else I didn't like it. You may think a few hundred RPM arent bad, but my gas mileage went down 3-4mpg on the highway and the car was much louder and just less enjoyable to drive overall. I do mostly city driving, lots of traffic, and sometimes open freeways. I switched to a 10 bolt with 3.73s because I dont do much racing at the track at all anymore so I didnt need the strength of the 9" along with all it's headaches. With 3.73s, it feels like it doesnt pull quite as hard from a stop, but its really not THAT big of a difference. My vote is 3.73s unless you plan on taking it to the track a lot, in which case you'll benefit from the 4.11s. Also, if you're just accelerating normal, the 3.73s are more enjoyable just because you wont have to be shifting as much or as fast. You can hold a gear longer with 3.73s before you have to shift. Like I said, it may not SEEM like much, but after having both, 4.11s to 3.73s was a night and day difference for my style of driving.
__________________

2002 Camaro SS, Black on Black, 6spd, Hard Top
torquer 3, headers, pulley 418rwhp 377rwtq through 9"
Jimmard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 01:01 PM   #7
Teching In
 
ruble50's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmard View Post
I have had both, and let me tell you, to me, the 3.73s are much muuuuuch more enjoyable. I had a 9" with 4.11s that was FUN at the track, but everywhere else I didn't like it. You may think a few hundred RPM arent bad, but my gas mileage went down 3-4mpg on the highway and the car was much louder and just less enjoyable to drive overall. I do mostly city driving, lots of traffic, and sometimes open freeways. I switched to a 10 bolt with 3.73s because I dont do much racing at the track at all anymore so I didnt need the strength of the 9" along with all it's headaches. With 3.73s, it feels like it doesnt pull quite as hard from a stop, but its really not THAT big of a difference. My vote is 3.73s unless you plan on taking it to the track a lot, in which case you'll benefit from the 4.11s. Also, if you're just accelerating normal, the 3.73s are more enjoyable just because you wont have to be shifting as much or as fast. You can hold a gear longer with 3.73s before you have to shift. Like I said, it may not SEEM like much, but after having both, 4.11s to 3.73s was a night and day difference for my style of driving.

hmmm, makes me think now.
Any more opinions from people that have expriences with both set of gears?
__________________
2000 Z28 NBM Camaro M6
K&N Intake, QTP E-cutout, ls6 intake manifold, !EGR!,

ruble50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 02:11 PM   #8
TECH Enthusiast
 
Jimmard's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 10
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Newhall, CA
Posts: 733
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ruble50 View Post
hmmm, makes me think now.
Any more opinions from people that have expriences with both set of gears?
Just remember that there are people driving around with 4.56 gears in their daily driver cars with MS4 cams and think that it's great. It all comes down to how much tolerance you have really. I found what I like with 3.73s.
__________________

2002 Camaro SS, Black on Black, 6spd, Hard Top
torquer 3, headers, pulley 418rwhp 377rwtq through 9"
Jimmard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 02:21 PM   #9
TECH Enthusiast
 
Trader Rating: 10
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 530
Default

I stepped up to 4.10s from 3.73s when I did a cam swap, but I never got to drive the car before it spun a bearing. Jimmard your post has me thinking of swaping back because I dont for see going to the track much, plus my 3.73s pulled good with the stock cam. Oh well I guess I will have to see what my car does when I get it running again.
Mr. Trick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 02:26 PM   #10
TECH Enthusiast
 
Jimmard's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 10
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Newhall, CA
Posts: 733
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Trick View Post
I stepped up to 4.10s from 3.73s when I did a cam swap, but I never got to drive the car before it spun a bearing. Jimmard your post has me thinking of swaping back because I dont for see going to the track much, plus my 3.73s pulled good with the stock cam. Oh well I guess I will have to see what my car does when I get it running again.
There are downsides to 3.73s with a bigger cam as well. I wouldn't go any bigger than my cam with 3.73s. The major difference in driveability with the cam is that it surges a little more now than it did before only when driving and holding a gear below 1500ish RPMS. Now this is most likely because I am at a slightly lower RPM than I was with 4.11s, but a quick push in of the clutch, blip of the throttle, and let the clutch back out and the surging goes away. If you're split between the two, go with a 3.90 gear ratio.
__________________

2002 Camaro SS, Black on Black, 6spd, Hard Top
torquer 3, headers, pulley 418rwhp 377rwtq through 9"
Jimmard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 02:34 PM   #11
Slow but Shiny Moderator
 
MeentSS02's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 6
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 7,768
Default

I originally ordered 4.11s with my Strange 12-bolt, and am strongly considering going with 3.73s when I have it rebuilt next spring (the gear whine is horrible). Granted, I'll have to get 3.73s for a 4-series carrier, but it looks like they are available, but I don't know if that will make them inherently noisy or not (or more prone to failure since they will be a thinner ring gear).

Anyhoo...the 4.11s are nice and all, but as already stated, you can't hold each gear as long (unless you have a raised rev limiter due to a cam swap and tune), so you'll be shifting more quickly, and wheel spin becomes a rather large issue, especially on street tires. Now that it is colder out, I can punch it in 2nd gear and the tires will spin...great for showing off, but it won't get you anywhere fast (my car is bolt-ons only).

The most annoying thing to me is where it puts the car in the RPM band when cruising down the interstate...my exhaust is very loud once it reaches 1900-2000 RPMs, and gets worse from there on up. You just end up with a lot of extra noise while cruising, and that definitely makes the car less enjoyable to drive around for fun, which is really all I do.

Play with some gear ratio calculators, and you'll quickly figure out that unless you run a really tall tire or really raise the rev-limiter, you might end up limiting yourself in 4th gear to something lower than you can possibly trap in the 1/4 if you go with a big cube motor like I am planning on doing. For me and my future plans, the 3.73s make more sense all around.
__________________
Steve Meents
2002 Camaro SS - Built using advice from the internet. Runs 14s.
2007 Toyota Tacoma - Beater

Quote:
Originally Posted by nncfan8 View Post
Looks like a 300c butt fucked a solstice and this is their retarded love child.
MeentSS02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 PM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS