Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Generation III Internal Engine
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-21-2009, 10:10 PM   #41
On The Tree
 
RAZORS10's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 119
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime View Post
The only way to know for sure is to take a few valves out and have a look for your self. Since the seats were replaced for the larger valves, you must have had a valve job done. Check the quality of work where the machine cutting meets the uncut casting. If they have already been blended or make a reasonably smooth transition, you will likely be fine. If not, you have room for improvement with some careful bowl work.

In all the posts I have seen here, the biggest improvements to stock castings comes from a quality valve job and porting the areas around the seat and the guides.
Thanks man.
__________________


ARE YOU GOING TO MAKE HISTORY OR MAKE EXCUSES? RACING INSPIRES GREATNESS!
RAZORS10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2009, 06:18 PM   #42
11 Second Club
 
MeanGreen's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: McAllen,TX
Posts: 111
Default

What heads came on the 2000 F-Bodies?
__________________
|2000 Camaro|11.84@113 1.58-60'ft.|
|LS6 Intake|Ported TB| pulley|Monster Motorsports tune|3.73 gears|Yank PT4000|whisper lid|msd wires|Pacesetter LT headers w/ ORY|
MeanGreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 01:52 AM   #43
Launching!
 
KMS.1320's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 228
Default

In ported form AND stock form the 243's are superior. They have a better shape and more meat in the right areas. No doubt you can improve the 241's with porting, and a well ported set of 241's will do better than a pair of poorly ported 243's. There are areas in 241's where a good porter would need to remove material to get the perfect shape he wanted, but he can't because he'd hit water.
__________________
Kevin
1999 Camaro Z28

"For you who believe all you read, I caution you - you are daily being brainwashed for profit by extremely effective psychology with very little regard to factual accuracy. In short, you're at the mercy of the world's greatest bullshit artists with the morals of a stray tomcat."
- Smokey Yunick
KMS.1320 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 07:15 PM   #44
Teching In
2001 Pontiac Trans Am
 
taman86's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South East AZ
Posts: 14
Default

im not goin to try and steal any ones glory here but i have to agree with hammertime with the numbers and the streetablity vs. raceability. even tho your 241 heads may flow 320 cfm on the intake, the only time any engine is going to use that full 320 cfm is if it is forced in there. but then yoour exhuast is 100 cfm less then the intake which means if youo do use all your 320 cfm then your going to be backed up on the exhaust side but thats besides the point. for a moderately sized cam you do want a good flowing intake and a good flowing head but not to the point where the head is only good at max rpms. you want a head that can flow decently at driving speeds and rpms, cuz honestly where are you going to use over 250 cfm wide open daily unless the car is a dedicated race car. thats why the l92 heads are a great flowing head but those heads are almost never going to meet their full potential. but not only do you want flow rating at low rpms, but it also comes down to volume vs. effeciency like hammertime said. if you have to much volume and too little effeciency then the flow will slow down to the point where the heads are a race only application even with an aggressive street cam. so want a head that can both provide enough air for the cam you have chosen but also provide enough flow that it can be driven at streetable speeds and rpms. so yes 241's and 853's stock are very restrictive for even the mild cam swap. but a good set of ported 241's or 853's are better then stock 243's and will be enough for the mild to moderate cam swap (220 to high 230 duration cams), but anything over that will deffinately want a set of ported 243's or a set of cnc'd heads. but once again it also depends on the flow ratings not only at maximum valve lift but at all through the lift cycle.
__________________
Futral F13 230/232 .595"/.585" 112 LSA cam, LS6 intake,FLP Lt's, true duals with x-pipe bullet mufflers cat delete, PRC .650" dual springs, Comp hardened pushrods, upgraded 1.7 stock rocker arms with trunnion bearings, K & N FIPK II intake, SLP 85mm MAF, 85mm Pro Products tb, rollmaster single HD timing chain, Walbro 155 lph fuel pump with racetronix voltage increase, Spec Stage 3+ clutch, Billet flywheel

A SS looks like it will kick your ass, a WS6 looks like it's coming over to do it.
taman86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 07:21 PM   #45
TECH Veteran
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 71
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 4,054
Default

airflow consumed by engine has many variables.
243 or 799 are better option over any other cathedral port head in stock form. and will support over 500bhp in 5.7L+ engines.
__________________
LS1 SS
LoneStar1nnovationSS
NemeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 10:35 PM   #46
Launching!
 
1SLwLS1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NemeSS View Post
airflow consumed by engine has many variables.
243 or 799 are better option over any other cathedral port head in stock form. and will support over 500bhp in 5.7L+ engines.
Plus the much more efficient CC. The 241 has shrouded valves, especially when someone throws larger valves in there w/out cleaning that side of the CC up. Thanks again for the great deal on 799s!

Oh yea, we're in a 9 month old thread
__________________
Complete Rod End Suspension, 12 bolt w/ 3.42s, Mac Mids, O/R Y, Borla CB, Ported TB, LS6 Intake
MS4 on 111, stock 799 heads, 417 rwhp, 392 rwtq H/C
1SLwLS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 11:48 PM   #47
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: HUMBLE TX
Posts: 52
Send a message via Yahoo to M1T/A
Default

no kiddin still good advise
M1T/A is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
241, 243, 853, assembled, blue, flow, gain, head, heads, ls1, spec, specs, springs, stock, tech


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 PM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS