What are you future plans? If I can give you some advice do not buy 241's. Reason I made the same mistake did not listen to any one. The 243s are better heads. It has a lot to do with the runners. The 243s have stock 212CC intake runners and the 241s have 260cc runners. The larger runners are shitty for low to mid range hp, throttle response and performance.
__________________ 98 z-28,a-4,tr 230/224,comp 918's,ls6 intake+ported tb,Kooks 1 3/4,true duals with 1 chambers, pt4000,3.73's,spohn solids and some BMR susp.stuff.
best et=11.61 @116.30 on a 1.61 60'
yea i don't see them having 260cc intake runners. i have a set of 241's right now that are p&p by absolute speed. previous owner put down 416 to the wheels on a mustang dyno with just a 224 cam..that's pretty damn good. anyway. i need to know the cc of the combustion chamber. not the intake runners. also a relative compression with stock pistons and 68cc heads
__________________ Reggie
2001 trans am
lid, long tubes, hurst pro 5.0, some suspension...
thanks. i need to know what the actual size of the combustion chambers are. not just the compression. at wat cc is it making 10.1 and 10.5. i already know what compression you get. just need to know what cc the combustion chambers are. thanks
__________________ Reggie
2001 trans am
lid, long tubes, hurst pro 5.0, some suspension...
thanks. i need to know what the actual size of the combustion chambers are. not just the compression. at wat cc is it making 10.1 and 10.5. i already know what compression you get. just need to know what cc the combustion chambers are. thanks