Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Generation IV External Engine
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-17-2009, 01:39 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9
Default Capability of L92 heads?

I'm doing a N/A LS2 w/ L92 heads. What are these heads capable of? I'd like to get 600 Hp at the flywheel.
Kmontgomery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 10:20 AM   #2
Launching!
 
3fingas's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 9
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Weston, FL
Posts: 291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kmontgomery View Post
I'm doing a N/A LS2 w/ L92 heads. What are these heads capable of? I'd like to get 600 Hp at the flywheel.
They are capable of flowing a lot of fucking air. 600 hp is easily attainable.
__________________
3fingas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 05:05 PM   #3
TECH Junkie
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,282
Default

You can get 600 FWHP with old ass ported LS1 heads....I did with my 427ci.

L92's are good to get you close to 600 RWHP on a nicely matched set-up.

I'm sure if I put some ported L92 that flow in the mid 360's @ .650 I'd probably gain about 60-65 RWHP on my engine with a cam to match.

When you start using heads that flow 350 cfm and better on the LSx engine.....it starts to become the intakes that are the restrictions.

.
__________________
1998 WS6 T/A 492 RWHP//495 RWTQ (w/cats)
LS6 427ci LPE short block, Ported stock TB, Ported LS6 intake, Ported LS1 heads, cam: 244/244 .610/.610 114 lsa, 1 7/8" Grotyohan LT's, 3" custom "Y" back to a Magnaflow Muffler, Built tranny...by a friend, Strange 12 bolt, 3.73 gears, Baer brakes, Hotchkis STB, LG Motorsports: Panhard Rod, LCA's, SFC's, G2 Super Springs, Hals all around, 315/rear, 275/front

Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we're here we might as well DANCE.
LS6427 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 11:59 AM   #4
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
Gen414's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 35
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 2,310
Default

PM "3timeracin" he did a full out NA build with the '92's, and made well over 700HP (@ 750 if I remember correctly)

I made 640 FWHP with a hydraulic roller, and a Vic Jr intake.

The limits on teh '92 are jsut a few:

Cam size. Limited to @ .720-.750" lift (no room for valve springs necessary for a bigger cam than that)

Deck thickness. It does have somewhat of a thin deck. You can still boost them of course, but jsut keep in mind that if you pick up a used set, and say they have already been decked before, and sayyou need to have them milled again to clean them up...you might be running out of deck at that point.

They stall @ .650". We flowed my heads, and they flowed the same @ .700 as they did at .650. Mine are not the only one's that I have heard teh same thing. GMPP will tell that as well.

So, as you can see, #1 and #3 go hand in hand...you can't run a big cam because of limited valve spring, but they don't flow "good" air @ those lifts anyways.

Would have to think that @ 750 FWHP is about the limit on a NA setup with teh L92 head, unless you spent ALOT of money adding material/epoxy, etc..and that is stil questionable. At that point, you might as well step into teh aftermarket.

Under boost, they flow enough to make some serious steam of course, but clamping them with a thin deck would be the only concernat that point. SO, would think that @ 1200-1300 HP under boost would be the limit (purely guessing on that one though)

But, for what they are, and how much they are, dollar for dollar, you will NOT find a better head. Again, dollar for dollar. Then of course, trying to build a all out race motor, then different story at that point as well...
__________________


www.morrismotorsports.net
281-732-8215
Dealer for Monster Clutches
90MM TB on sale $275 and 92MM TB on sale $299
On special: 427" ERL Shortblocks only $4500
500" ERL Super Deck II shortblock only $9500
Gen414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 12:11 PM   #5
Launching!
 
1lejohn's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 8
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena Texas
Posts: 245
Default

Thats some great info GEN 414.
__________________
99 Hugger Orange 1LE Camaro A4 , 383, 4.11 12 bolt.
11.0 @ 123 3550 lbs w driver on MT drag radials.
456 HP with Converter locked and 3.42 10 Bolt.
New Best 10.55 @ 132 ,ET Streets, 150 NX Wet shot. This car was driven to and from HRP.
New Combo L-92 Block and Heads 414ci
Being built by The Head Shop
1lejohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 09:00 PM   #6
Launching!
 
3fingas's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 9
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Weston, FL
Posts: 291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gen414 View Post
PM "3timeracin" he did a full out NA build with the '92's, and made well over 700HP (@ 750 if I remember correctly)

I made 640 FWHP with a hydraulic roller, and a Vic Jr intake.

The limits on teh '92 are jsut a few:

Cam size. Limited to @ .720-.750" lift (no room for valve springs necessary for a bigger cam than that)

Deck thickness. It does have somewhat of a thin deck. You can still boost them of course, but jsut keep in mind that if you pick up a used set, and say they have already been decked before, and sayyou need to have them milled again to clean them up...you might be running out of deck at that point.

They stall @ .650". We flowed my heads, and they flowed the same @ .700 as they did at .650. Mine are not the only one's that I have heard teh same thing. GMPP will tell that as well.

So, as you can see, #1 and #3 go hand in hand...you can't run a big cam because of limited valve spring, but they don't flow "good" air @ those lifts anyways.

Would have to think that @ 750 FWHP is about the limit on a NA setup with teh L92 head, unless you spent ALOT of money adding material/epoxy, etc..and that is stil questionable. At that point, you might as well step into teh aftermarket.

Under boost, they flow enough to make some serious steam of course, but clamping them with a thin deck would be the only concernat that point. SO, would think that @ 1200-1300 HP under boost would be the limit (purely guessing on that one though)

But, for what they are, and how much they are, dollar for dollar, you will NOT find a better head. Again, dollar for dollar. Then of course, trying to build a all out race motor, then different story at that point as well...
+2. They do make great street heads. $1200 +/- cnc'd from GM..LOL. They actually make more with less. 623fw powa with the torquer 7.
__________________
3fingas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 09:22 PM   #7
TECH Junkie
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gen414 View Post
PM "3timeracin" he did a full out NA build with the '92's, and made well over 700HP (@ 750 if I remember correctly)

I made 640 FWHP with a hydraulic roller, and a Vic Jr intake.

The limits on teh '92 are jsut a few:

Cam size. Limited to @ .720-.750" lift (no room for valve springs necessary for a bigger cam than that)

Deck thickness. It does have somewhat of a thin deck. You can still boost them of course, but jsut keep in mind that if you pick up a used set, and say they have already been decked before, and sayyou need to have them milled again to clean them up...you might be running out of deck at that point.

They stall @ .650". We flowed my heads, and they flowed the same @ .700 as they did at .650. Mine are not the only one's that I have heard teh same thing. GMPP will tell that as well.

So, as you can see, #1 and #3 go hand in hand...you can't run a big cam because of limited valve spring, but they don't flow "good" air @ those lifts anyways.

Would have to think that @ 750 FWHP is about the limit on a NA setup with teh L92 head, unless you spent ALOT of money adding material/epoxy, etc..and that is stil questionable. At that point, you might as well step into teh aftermarket.

Under boost, they flow enough to make some serious steam of course, but clamping them with a thin deck would be the only concernat that point. SO, would think that @ 1200-1300 HP under boost would be the limit (purely guessing on that one though)

But, for what they are, and how much they are, dollar for dollar, you will NOT find a better head. Again, dollar for dollar. Then of course, trying to build a all out race motor, then different story at that point as well...
No shit...good post. I've been literally wanting to ask all those questions for awhile now about the L92's.

Thanks.

.
__________________
1998 WS6 T/A 492 RWHP//495 RWTQ (w/cats)
LS6 427ci LPE short block, Ported stock TB, Ported LS6 intake, Ported LS1 heads, cam: 244/244 .610/.610 114 lsa, 1 7/8" Grotyohan LT's, 3" custom "Y" back to a Magnaflow Muffler, Built tranny...by a friend, Strange 12 bolt, 3.73 gears, Baer brakes, Hotchkis STB, LG Motorsports: Panhard Rod, LCA's, SFC's, G2 Super Springs, Hals all around, 315/rear, 275/front

Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we're here we might as well DANCE.
LS6427 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 04:23 PM   #8
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: corrupt shit hole that is Alabama
Posts: 87
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LS6427 View Post
No shit...good post. I've been literally wanting to ask all those questions for awhile now about the L92's.

Thanks.

.
Too bad the poster didnt know what they were talking about.......


I have my flow sheet for my l92's from TEA and they flow:

@.600 353.8 cfm intake 265.4 on the exhaust
@.700 370.9 cfm intake 274.7 on the exhaust

Looks like the flow increased with lift unless TEA doesnt know what they are doing(highly doubtful)

Goes to show vendors dont even know it all and that everything you read on the net should be taken with a grain of salt because most of the time people are talking out there a$$.

I was kinda surprised when my flowed heads did better than other TEA l92's but I am happy with 370cfm heads for less than $1500.
__________________
2005 white diamonds Escalade EXT,LT's w/ ORY,Shaner ported TB,MSD wires,JBA catback,CAI w/ Green filter,160 stat,SCT tuning by Henson,free mods,and more bass than a crack house!!!

Stroker and l92 top end to come!
broke1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 08:27 PM   #9
Launching!
 
FMS_FTW's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 250
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by broke1 View Post
Too bad the poster didnt know what they were talking about.......


I have my flow sheet for my l92's from TEA and they flow:

@.600 353.8 cfm intake 265.4 on the exhaust
@.700 370.9 cfm intake 274.7 on the exhaust

Looks like the flow increased with lift unless TEA doesnt know what they are doing(highly doubtful)

Goes to show vendors dont even know it all and that everything you read on the net should be taken with a grain of salt because most of the time people are talking out there a$$.

I was kinda surprised when my flowed heads did better than other TEA l92's but I am happy with 370cfm heads for less than $1500.
What type of power did they make? Just because it is flowing alot of air doesn't mean that they are flowing with the same type of velocity as a head that flows 360/240 at .650 lift.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLK85 View Post
You must not know the golden rule, if you get pulled over and are guilty STFU.
FMS_FTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 05:53 PM   #10
On The Tree
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greenvile, sc
Posts: 136
Default

Too bad the poster didnt know what they were talking about.......


I have my flow sheet for my l92's from TEA and they flow:



stock they dont flow well past .650... ported is a whole other game... its you that doesnt know what your talking about. you really know that little about how porting works?
__________________
98 Trans Am
ls3, g6x3!
t/a98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 09:39 PM   #11
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 36
Default

better get my boots on......shits getting deep!
__________________

2006 Chevy Trailblazer SS
Loose Coose Racing
bryanracing95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
350, bads, cfm, engines, flow, heads, l92, ls2, ported, sale


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS