Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Generation IV External Engine
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-01-2007, 08:22 PM   #61
TECH Enthusiast
 
NC98Z's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 700
Default

Well I'll wait for the GMHTP shootout. I want them to test Fast Toys 85mm lid at the same time. Let there be air! Not some stagnent Air but some high velocity shit. My motor needs to breath!
__________________
TSP 347 SB, MS4, TSP PRC Stage 2.5 LS6 Heads,LS6 Intake, FTRA, Dynatech Supermaxx, DMH, Hooker Exaust, 3.73s, Vig 32-3400 stall, Performabuilt Stage 2 Tranny,TB P&P, and Tuned by RPM Garner, N.C.
NC98Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2007, 08:31 PM   #62
LS1TECH Sponsor
 
Ryne @ CMS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 8
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: murrieta
Posts: 2,199
Send a message via AIM to Ryne @ CMS
Default

i saw it today at sema, its alright, i do like the price point. they also have a
l92 version, but he pretty mush told me its done a 6000rpm, which is well not much better then the l76.... but we shall see
__________________
Ryne Cunningham
Cunningham Motorsports
Specializing In Late Model EFI Performance.
Lake Elsinore, CA
Shop: (951)471-2898
Cell: (951)375-2453

Ryne-CMS@Hotmail.com


VP RACE FUEL IN STOCK MS109(Unleaded) & C16
Remote Clutch Speed Bleeders available for F-body, GTO, C5/C6 Corvette
Full Dyno Tuning, 1,2,3 Bar
Dyno Dynamics 450DS Dyno

04 Z06 10.03 @ 137mph
05 GTO 10.1 @ 137mph with a beat ass clutch!
08 Z06 488whp 435wtq intake and tune
Ryne @ CMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2007, 08:46 PM   #63
Banned
 
ramairws6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 23
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hicksville MN!
Posts: 822
Default

Me and Speedo went over and checked it out today again and seen some more great options. Not only can you change the snout from 78mm to 90mm you also can adjust the mounting of the injector size for all the different injector and fuelrail options. Also the Aussie told us that the bottom of the intake is made to fit like stock so the bolts for the valleycover have plenty of room for the stock hardware, on the Fast you have to change all this.Another thing like stated above was that there are universal map sensor locations with good mounting in which you don't need to buy an extra wire harness. These guys had everything covered on this thing so they should do ok even if it's of comparable results. I like it!! Traver
ramairws6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2007, 09:13 PM   #64
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
 
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 83
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jax Beach, Florida
Posts: 7,404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VH5150 View Post
IF im not mistaken, ERL did the resleeve on turley's camaro..... They are the shit.....
Correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Alchemist View Post
It will be interesting to see how well it performs compared to a FAST 90/90, or even a ported FAST.

Time will tell.
+1

Quote:
Originally Posted by JS View Post
WEIAND is working with Starr and IMO it would be waste for a big company like WEIAND to bring this new intake out if they werent sure it worked...If its a flop they would loose $$$$$$ just in development and sales....
Large companies actually do this quite a lot. Look at the Edelbrock LT1 / LT4 intakes they just came out with. I think they made 4hp over a stock intake.
Beaflag VonRathburg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2007, 09:37 PM   #65
Banned
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 234
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beaflag VonRathburg View Post
Large companies actually do this quite a lot. Look at the Edelbrock LT1 / LT4 intakes they just came out with. I think they made 4hp over a stock intake.
there is allmost no point for that lol, 4hp id rather just port the stock intake
CETA_TransAm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2007, 09:40 PM   #66
10 Second Club
 
Trader Rating: 8
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 394
Default

Truthfully, I wouldn't really care if it came up a couple hp short of a ported FAST 90. If I can save $400 it would be well worth it for me. That is as long as it out performs the L76 intake in my case.
fastGBcamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2007, 09:43 PM   #67
TECH Veteran
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 7
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Buckingham PA
Posts: 4,792
Send a message via AIM to The Alchemist
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beaflag VonRathburg View Post
Correct
Large companies actually do this quite a lot. Look at the Edelbrock LT1 / LT4 intakes they just came out with. I think they made 4hp over a stock intake.
Exactly, it seems like every year at SEMA someone new is releasing a new ls1/ls6 intake and only a FAST is better that the ls6. We've got the PP Typhoon, the Lingenfelter, the BBK manifold, and the Weiand. All of these came onto the market are were simply rebadged ls6 intakes. None of them made any substantial power over the stock ls6 intake.

Like I said, I'll beleive it when I see it multiple times.
__________________

www.fquick.com/The_Alchemist
*PHK East coast*
The Alchemist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2007, 10:00 PM   #68
TECH Veteran
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 71
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 4,054
Default

the intake is a nice piece and will force fast to plummet the price and finally remove the premiums they hold on the 90mm fast intakes
but a fi or bigger than stock cubes stroker motor a single plane with a
proper elbow plenum is my poison.
it should be a nice piece for a bolt ons/h/c/i car
not sure about this intake with hi flow heads, stroker motors.
imo that intake will kill a /400+ci l92 version engine
__________________
LS1 SS
LoneStar1nnovationSS
NemeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2007, 10:28 PM   #69
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Upper Westchester County, NY
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryne @ CMS View Post
i saw it today at sema, its alright, i do like the price point. they also have a
l92 version, but he pretty mush told me its done a 6000rpm, which is well not much better then the l76.... but we shall see
My L92 intake make power up to 6200.. Then what's the point of the aftermarket one?

I was hoping they'd break the L92 power band issue...
ForceFedC5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2007, 10:37 PM   #70
Banned
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 234
Default

you think this intake well be better for FI being that it is a solid intake
CETA_TransAm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007, 01:18 AM   #71
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 50
Default

I will volunteer to be the test mule for strokers. My 402 would look great with that, and I could dyno it the day FedX drops it off...
Swamp Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007, 05:56 AM   #72
Drag Racing Moderator
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 39
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: In the garage, working towards a 2900 lb raceweight :D
Posts: 10,773
Send a message via AIM to JL ws-6 Send a message via Yahoo to JL ws-6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JS View Post
I here that but for me with a shift point of 6500 I likey alot
That's kinda my concern, running 402ci vs stock and shifting at 7100.... it kinda worries me it will run out of steam worse then a fast does. I KNOW that with an intake that would outflow the fast up top I could make another 15 to 20 hp, butI just haven't found the extra $ to buy a sheetmetal or a single plane and have it ported at this point.
__________________
http://quicktimeperformance.com/Media/EFI2008.wmv

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Rod
First off Hp/L is ricer math, and is pretty much useless
JL ws-6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007, 06:08 AM   #73
JDP
TECH Fanatic
 
JDP's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 20
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Allen Park, MI
Posts: 1,383
Default

shit, if it only pulls to 6k with the L92 version ill keep rocking the L76, my cam needs more rpms but the L76 holds the power to 6300rpms, i need an intake that wont fall off like the L76
__________________
JDP

99 Firebird Fomula 402ci LS2
JDP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007, 10:58 AM   #74
LS1Tech Co-Founder
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 33
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 38,905
Default

Yeah I talked to Peter Starr at SEMA. They will be selling two versions, one is cathedral port, the other is rectangle port. They are shooting for a $650 price point. Intake will probably be avaiable not only in gloss black, but a silver finish. They might consider red or orange if the interest was there, like if you guys were interested.

ADMIN
__________________
Co-Founder, LS1Tech.com , PerformanceTrucks.net & PlanetLSX.com
Online Garage: www.fquick.com/ProStockJohn
2000 Z/28 | article soon.......
2000 Z/28 | 10.00@133 346 cid/150 shot | Retired
1998 Formula | 9.40@143 346 cid/88mm turbo | Retired
1951 Mercury | Chopped | SBC
Pro Stock John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007, 11:00 AM   #75
TECH Addict
 
CaMaRo67RS355's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 35
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rock Hill, South Carolina
Posts: 2,278
Send a message via AIM to CaMaRo67RS355 Send a message via MSN to CaMaRo67RS355
Default

dayum i cant wait to see a dyno comparison of the fast 90 and of the new weiand intake
__________________
www.tick-performance.com (704) 660-5843 || www.ws6store.com & www.texas-speed.com
1967 RS Hardtop Muncie 4 speed-in restoration
1984 F150 under 99,000 original miles
2002 SS M6 Black with Red w/ Ebony interior (Dale Earnhardt Themed)-"All Throttle Plus Bottle" Bolt Ons, Bolt Ins whats the difference

CaMaRo67RS355 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007, 12:05 PM   #76
Drag Racing Moderator
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 39
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: In the garage, working towards a 2900 lb raceweight :D
Posts: 10,773
Send a message via AIM to JL ws-6 Send a message via Yahoo to JL ws-6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDP View Post
shit, if it only pulls to 6k with the L92 version ill keep rocking the L76, my cam needs more rpms but the L76 holds the power to 6300rpms, i need an intake that wont fall off like the L76
I hear ya on that one, my ET 240 headed 402 makes power to 7400 before it falls off with an unported fast 90... I was hoping that I could keep that style intake and not go to a single plane, but if this thing falls off like stated I guess I have no choice, that or sheet metal, but spending 3000 on an intake and a big 100 mm TB is just not in the picture at this point. A single plane would be nice, but putting an elbow on kills that so a 4150 tb is the only way to go on that really, so I have to go to sd tuning, etc.etc.etc.

Be nice to have an intake we can bolt on that will feed 400+ ci to 8000 rpm, but maybe it's just not possible with that design, I dunno.
__________________
http://quicktimeperformance.com/Media/EFI2008.wmv

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Rod
First off Hp/L is ricer math, and is pretty much useless
JL ws-6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007, 12:25 PM   #77
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
 
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 83
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jax Beach, Florida
Posts: 7,404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CETA_TransAm View Post
you think this intake well be better for FI being that it is a solid intake
Being a solid intake I could see it holding up better to boost. Pretty much like a better flowing LS6.
Beaflag VonRathburg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007, 12:34 PM   #78
Banned
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 234
Default

does any 1 know if the stock fuel rail will fit over this intake ?
CETA_TransAm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007, 01:21 PM   #79
LS1Tech Co-Founder
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 33
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 38,905
Default

I might get an early production one, so if I do I'll make sure we dyno it on at least one car, back to back comparo.
__________________
Co-Founder, LS1Tech.com , PerformanceTrucks.net & PlanetLSX.com
Online Garage: www.fquick.com/ProStockJohn
2000 Z/28 | article soon.......
2000 Z/28 | 10.00@133 346 cid/150 shot | Retired
1998 Formula | 9.40@143 346 cid/88mm turbo | Retired
1951 Mercury | Chopped | SBC
Pro Stock John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007, 01:24 PM   #80
9 Second Club
2002 Chevrolet S 10
 
Black X's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 9
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CANADA!
Posts: 530
Default

Hey Guys, I had a nice long look at this yesterday at the convention center. They were claiming 30+HP Better then an LS6 intake on a Modified 5.7L. The graph dyno graph they showed me was indeed 30HP stonger in the midrange and fell off to about 5-10 stronger by 6300rpm. The intake looks good and has some nice features. Its supposed to hit the shelfs in March and retail near $650 From what I was told. I suggested they add Nitrous provisions before final production.

Enjoy.













__________________
Truck with 65E 9.38@153.6 -- 1.46 60'
Black X is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
90mm, complaint, cunningham, elsinore, holley, intake, lake, ls, ls1, ls2, ls3, manifold, motorsports, street, warrior, weiand


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS