Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Generation IV Internal Engine
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-02-2009, 01:29 PM   #61
TECH Resident
 
Trader Rating: 42
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 785
Default

i wonder why katech don't step in and put in their 2cents or even the guy from comp?
__________________
http://www.bmrfabrication.com
94 guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 06:09 PM   #62
10 Second Club
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 14
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 2,771
Default

Guys, a 90mm TB will support over a 1000 RWHP without issue. That's almost a 3" opening.

The ported LS7 intake apparently is solid. Thanks for posting this real world test. Subscribing for future porting results.
__________________
98Z28CobraKiller
370ci LQ9 + AFR225's + PT88 9.57 @ 142 so far
98Z28CobraKiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 08:18 PM   #63
TECH Senior Member
2000 Chevrolet Corvette
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 5,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8ByGoat View Post
Don't really think this is a surprise.

But maybe with the bigger TB and you doing an all-out port job on the intake you will get some results.

After taking a closer look, you picked up some between 3800 and 4200 and then again at 6700-6900.

Curious as to the difference in conditions between the 2 runs?
+1 I see some visible gains. 10+ rwhp picked up in certain spots but only for brief times. Can't wait to see the fully ported version and larger TB.

Thanks for the HONEST numbers. Glad to see the numbers unfudged to post facts, vs fudged to sell intakes that as is don't make power across the board vs the ported ls7 intake.
__________________
2000 FRC LS2 402 - 541 rwhp 505 rwtq Tuned by Vengeance Racing
TFS 215's (59cc) Custom Cam, 1 7/8 ARH, Ported FAST 92, UD Pully, EWP
RPS Street Twin Lite, and Pfadt Coil overs, Sways, bushings kit, RPM Stg III
For all your Performance needs:Vengeance Racing 678 513 7105
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamo...s-results.html
allngn_c5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 08:21 PM   #64
TECH Senior Member
2000 Chevrolet Corvette
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 5,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 98Z28CobraKiller View Post
Guys, a 90mm TB will support over a 1000 RWHP without issue. That's almost a 3" opening.

The ported LS7 intake apparently is solid. Thanks for posting this real world test. Subscribing for future porting results.
I hear ya bro, but my 402 did pick up power (6 rwhp 17 rwtq) going from a 90mm ls2 tb to a 95 mm Rev Xtreme TB. Thanks Tracy for getting her to work for us. Mike at Vengeance nailed the tune too. Idles perfectly and some more technical stuff that I am not qualified to explain. LOL

*********SORRY FOR THE SMALL HIJACK************
__________________
2000 FRC LS2 402 - 541 rwhp 505 rwtq Tuned by Vengeance Racing
TFS 215's (59cc) Custom Cam, 1 7/8 ARH, Ported FAST 92, UD Pully, EWP
RPS Street Twin Lite, and Pfadt Coil overs, Sways, bushings kit, RPM Stg III
For all your Performance needs:Vengeance Racing 678 513 7105
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamo...s-results.html
allngn_c5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 08:27 PM   #65
Launching!
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by allngn_c5 View Post
+1 I see some visible gains. 10+ rwhp picked up in certain spots but only for brief times. Can't wait to see the fully ported version and larger TB.

Thanks for the HONEST numbers. Glad to see the numbers unfudged to post facts, vs fudged to sell intakes that as is don't make power across the board vs the ported ls7 intake.
You can go over to the Corvette Forums and search-there seems to be a little more testing and results being "published" over there.
__________________
2005 GTO A4
Stock LS2 Bottom L92 Top End couple with FTI cam that is supposedly all wrong for L92 heads (thanks Ed Curtis) and a Yank SS3600 stall.
And a bunch of other "stuff" that I won't bore you with.
452 rwhp 403 rwtq
1.58 60'
11.22 at 120mph
Tuned by Mike at Vengeance
8ByGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 10:22 PM   #66
TECH Resident
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 961
Send a message via MSN to Abdullah Send a message via Yahoo to Abdullah
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLewis4095 View Post
This is more info than most were looking for I expect, but invaluable info when seeking to understand the reality behind flow numbers. If the intake charge does not flow with sufficient velocity to move through the entire "air pump" that our motors are, peak power cannot be realized.

As for the FAST 102 being worthwhile, independant testing such as Ragin's and company will be the real test and we may find that adding the 100mm TB may not do the trick.....but with the proper heads, cam profile, and exhaust as long as there is not a bottle neck or restriction in any of the key areas, I suspect we will see these make good power. If not, it will be a first for the FAST line of intake manifolds.
why they don't try dynotestingt the new Fast 102mm LS7 intake with a 90mm throttle body to see how it realy works regarding HP and the torque specialy Vs. 100mm throttle body.
__________________
Abdullah
2000 green M6 Z28 Mods: SLP flow pac, self ported LS1 heads with stock valves, TSP 233/239 cam, QTP 1-3/4" long tube headers, Borla cat back, ported Fast 90mm intake, NW 90mm throttle body, BMR adjustable panhard rod, BMR adjustable LCA's, BMR strut tower brace, BMR boxed SFC's, Koni Single Adjustable shocks, ES hyperflex bushings kit.

394rwhp/370rwtq SAE corrected dynojet dyno
tuned.
Abdullah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 10:55 PM   #67
TECH Senior Member
2000 Chevrolet Corvette
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 5,656
Default

Good idea Abdullah.
__________________
2000 FRC LS2 402 - 541 rwhp 505 rwtq Tuned by Vengeance Racing
TFS 215's (59cc) Custom Cam, 1 7/8 ARH, Ported FAST 92, UD Pully, EWP
RPS Street Twin Lite, and Pfadt Coil overs, Sways, bushings kit, RPM Stg III
For all your Performance needs:Vengeance Racing 678 513 7105
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamo...s-results.html
allngn_c5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 08:31 AM   #68
8 Second Club
 
veee8's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 25
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wilmington, North Carolina
Posts: 1,454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 98Z28CobraKiller View Post
Guys, a 90mm TB will support over a 1000 RWHP without issue. That's almost a 3" opening.

The ported LS7 intake apparently is solid. Thanks for posting this real world test. Subscribing for future porting results.
Just to fuel that fire, I have made over 1000hp with a 78mm TB.
__________________
388ci C5R block, Virginia Speed Double O-Ring, ETP 265's, Solid Roller, Jesel, Callies, Oliver, BS3, TH400, MWC Race 9" and a big ass turbo!
http://www.virginiaspeed.com
www.midwestchassis.com

veee8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 12:05 PM   #69
Launching!
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 281
Default

FWIW

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-z...g-reading.html

Made some good gains, but...........

Still not an apples to apples comparison because when they tested the LS7 intake they ran stock LS7 injectors. When they switched to the FAST they also switched the injectors to 60lbers.
__________________
2005 GTO A4
Stock LS2 Bottom L92 Top End couple with FTI cam that is supposedly all wrong for L92 heads (thanks Ed Curtis) and a Yank SS3600 stall.
And a bunch of other "stuff" that I won't bore you with.
452 rwhp 403 rwtq
1.58 60'
11.22 at 120mph
Tuned by Mike at Vengeance
8ByGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 01:51 PM   #70
Launching!
 
JUNK's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Westbank of N.O.
Posts: 254
Default

Proof that we will buy f'n ANYTHING if it's HYPED enough and we have to wait long enough. Nothing like selling a product and going to production b4 it's proven. And don't expect the all the vendors to come clean, some are, after all, in bed w/ comp. Some just get a better shafting than others.
__________________
'06 Z06 441ci LS7, ETP heads, Crower Ti rods, shaft rockers, diamonds, 4L65e, 3800stall, 3.42 gears 10.09@133mph 1.38 60' N/A 330shot 2-stage w/ Daves' stand-alone, chasing 8s
09 ZR1, 649 ftlbs to the tire (thanks Geoff @ EPS)
Originally Posted by Auto Zone Slimm
90% of the racers around here couldnt spin the tires "all the way down the track" even in the rain
JUNK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 04:15 PM   #71
TECH Senior Member
2000 Chevrolet Corvette
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 5,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JUNK View Post
Proof that we will buy f'n ANYTHING if it's HYPED enough and we have to wait long enough. Nothing like selling a product and going to production b4 it's proven. And don't expect the all the vendors to come clean, some are, after all, in bed w/ comp. Some just get a better shafting than others.


WOW and I thought I was the only black sheep around here !!!!!!!!!!!!!

You got balls to post it bro. Sponsor bashing is not permitted, ask me how I know.
__________________
2000 FRC LS2 402 - 541 rwhp 505 rwtq Tuned by Vengeance Racing
TFS 215's (59cc) Custom Cam, 1 7/8 ARH, Ported FAST 92, UD Pully, EWP
RPS Street Twin Lite, and Pfadt Coil overs, Sways, bushings kit, RPM Stg III
For all your Performance needs:Vengeance Racing 678 513 7105
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamo...s-results.html
allngn_c5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 03:47 AM   #72
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5
Default

You will only see real beneficial results with the Fast 102mm Intake in larger forced induction applications and only slight gains in all-out high rpm race applications over a Fast 92mm.
Speedomotive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 07:44 AM   #73
TECH Fanatic
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedomotive View Post
You will only see real beneficial results with the Fast 102mm Intake in larger forced induction applications and only slight gains in all-out high rpm race applications over a Fast 92mm.
WTF: They don't even fit the same heads so you can't compare them. Go back to being a reader.
__________________

521/480 (Honest Numbers) N/A LS2 403, WCCH L92 heads, Custom little BRE Justin Timberlake Cam, AR 1 7/8 Lt's w/ cats, Ti's, RAM DD clutch, RPM 3.90's
WKMCD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 08:12 AM   #74
TECH Senior Member
2000 Chevrolet Corvette
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 5,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WKMCD View Post
WTF: They don't even fit the same heads so you can't compare them. Go back to being a reader.
Play nice Kevin, he's only trying. Lets just stamp that post as:
FAIL !!!
__________________
2000 FRC LS2 402 - 541 rwhp 505 rwtq Tuned by Vengeance Racing
TFS 215's (59cc) Custom Cam, 1 7/8 ARH, Ported FAST 92, UD Pully, EWP
RPS Street Twin Lite, and Pfadt Coil overs, Sways, bushings kit, RPM Stg III
For all your Performance needs:Vengeance Racing 678 513 7105
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamo...s-results.html
allngn_c5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 09:51 AM   #75
9 Second Club
 
tektrans's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 6
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedomotive View Post
You will only see real beneficial results with the Fast 102mm Intake in larger forced induction applications and only slight gains in all-out high rpm race applications over a Fast 92mm.
haha, I guess you've done extensive reasearch and testing to come up with that statement.
Thanks, what would we all do without your valuable knowledge.
__________________

'98 Trans Am WS6 Cartek N/A (L92/LS7) Hydraulic roller 441 ci.
9.59 @ 138 1.30 60' - Best 60' 1.29
video of 9.6x passes http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=KVdBZk5Y3s4
**check out my TA in the Aug '09 issue of GMHTP magazine**
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...ws6/index.html
tektrans is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 09:07 PM   #76
10 Second Club
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 14
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 2,771
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by veee8 View Post
Just to fuel that fire, I have made over 1000hp with a 78mm TB.
FI Doesn't count. But I challenge Allgn to put that 90mm back on with his current tune and see what happens.
__________________
98Z28CobraKiller
370ci LQ9 + AFR225's + PT88 9.57 @ 142 so far

Last edited by 98Z28CobraKiller; 07-04-2009 at 09:16 PM..
98Z28CobraKiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 09:10 PM   #77
10 Second Club
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 14
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 2,771
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedomotive View Post
You will only see real beneficial results with the Fast 102mm Intake in larger forced induction applications and only slight gains in all-out high rpm race applications over a Fast 92mm.
I got this post on the auto notification in my email and the first thought that came to mind was "this could get ugly"
__________________
98Z28CobraKiller
370ci LQ9 + AFR225's + PT88 9.57 @ 142 so far
98Z28CobraKiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 09:14 PM   #78
10 Second Club
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 14
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 2,771
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94 guy View Post
i wonder why katech don't step in and put in their 2cents or even the guy from comp?
I've never seen anyone from Comp/FAST comment on any FAST intake. It's kind of a lose lose for them to comment as doing so would essentially be trying to convince us that Ragin's real world test is wrong.

That thread in the corvette forums was inconclusive at best. I'm sticking with thiss thread as "The Best Real World Results to Date".
__________________
98Z28CobraKiller
370ci LQ9 + AFR225's + PT88 9.57 @ 142 so far
98Z28CobraKiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009, 04:05 AM   #79
TECH Senior Member
2000 Chevrolet Corvette
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 5,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 98Z28CobraKiller View Post
FI Doesn't count. But I challenge Allgn to put that 90mm back on with his current tune and see what happens.
I'll bring it up with the guys at Vengeance on my next visit. If money keeps coming in I may be going back for susupension and something extra just for me. Not saying just yet. LOL.
__________________
2000 FRC LS2 402 - 541 rwhp 505 rwtq Tuned by Vengeance Racing
TFS 215's (59cc) Custom Cam, 1 7/8 ARH, Ported FAST 92, UD Pully, EWP
RPS Street Twin Lite, and Pfadt Coil overs, Sways, bushings kit, RPM Stg III
For all your Performance needs:Vengeance Racing 678 513 7105
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamo...s-results.html
allngn_c5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009, 05:29 AM   #80
Registered User
 
TheBlackPlague's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 27
Default

Well............this is how i see it

Ls1 design was basic, Then they did the ls6. TADA, THEEEN we started porting the ls6!

THEEEEN aftermarket companies made intakes and we ported those!!

All the while GM was (Im almost POSITIVE) scooping up these "Ported intakes" and studing them and figuring out what makes them tick .

Fast forward from the first ls style intake through 1o plus years and countless versions from GM and aftermarket pieces, Gm makes the ls7

The way i see it is how many times can you revise one single design (ls style intake) before it really cant get any better?
__________________
6.0 lq4, ported 317s ,f-11 cam ,70mm front mounted turbo, 10 psi spring , 4 inch single exaust , A4
TheBlackPlague is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
102mm, 90mm, 92mm, ace, bmr, bore, brace, difference, fast, intake, ls3, ls7, micrometer, results, strut, tower, wheels


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 AM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS