Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Stock L92 Head Flow Data

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2006, 11:18 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Richard@WCCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Van Nuys, CA
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default Stock L92 Head Flow Data

I just finished flow testing a new stock L92 head. All I can says is…….WOW! What a nice part.
I’d like to publicly thank StreetnStrip for the opportunity to test this head.
The test head has casting number 5364. Here’s the tale of the tape……..

4.030” test bore
Lift ___.100 _.150_.200_.250_.300 _.350 _.400 _.450 _.500 _.550 _.600 _.650_.700_.750
#1 Int. 74.9 109.4 154.4 193.5 225.3 252.8 274.6 292.7 308.8 321.0 328.7 326.6 310.0 316.6
#1 Exh. 63.6 97.9 126.1 148.7 162.3 178.6 189.6 197.6 205.5 210.7 214.6 217.8 221.2 223.5
The intake was tested with a radius plate and the exhaust was tested with a 2 ˝” stub pipe.

4.155” test bore
Lift ___.100 _.150_.200_.250_.300 _.350 _.400 _.450 _.500 _.550 _.600 _.650_.700_.750
#1 Int. 73.8 108.7 153.2 192.6 225.2 253.6 277.0 296.7 313.0 326.0 335.8 326.9 327.3 317.1
#1 Exh.61.1 97.9 125.7 148.1 162.0 179.5 191.8 200.1 205.9 213.3 218.4 220.9 221.9 223.2
The intake was tested with a radius plate and the exhaust was tested with a 2 ˝” stub pipe.

Exhaust port tested without pipe (4.155” bore).
Lift ___.100 _.150_.200_.250_.300 _.350 _.400 _.450 _.500 _.550 _.600 _.650_.700_.750
#1 Exh.63.1 94.7 121.1 140.6 156.9 165.8 176.1 182.8 187.9 191.4 193.7 195.6 197.6 199.5

Valve dimensions:
Intake = 2.160” X 4.870” X .314”(8mm)
Exhaust = 1.590” X 4.920” X .314”(8mm)

Seat/throat diameters:
Intake = 1.870”
Exhaust = 1.355”

Volumes:
Intake runner = 260.6cc
Exhaust runner = 90.0cc
Chamber = 69.8cc

A few observations………. These heads have the best seat/port lineup for an as cast GM head that I’ve seen. Their casting precision is VERY good. The fit and finish of the valves are very nice as well. The intake port is large, especially the area above the short turn radius. The intake cross section starts at 3.1sq/in at the intake flange and grows to almost 3.7sq/in forward of the guide boss!
I’m a bit disappointed with the exhaust port flow. IMO it needs to be at least 25 peak cfm better. I’m sure the engineers at GM know what they’re objective was and they were satisfied with the final product but I think for hot rodding especially blown applications, the exhaust port needs to be improved. Looks like head porters will have something to do after all………
I understand that there is a company working on a 4bbl carb style intake, but I’ll leave the intake manifold subject for another thread.

Happy hot rodding.

Richard
Old 04-05-2006, 11:33 PM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Nate_Taufer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North of Seattle
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you guys have any intention of putting a CNC program on these heads?

Also when did they go static? .625" ? And do you have a .625" flow number on a 4.03 bore?

Nate
Old 04-05-2006, 11:50 PM
  #3  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Richard@WCCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Van Nuys, CA
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

At the moment I have too many projects on the front burner. I'll consider a CNC program when more support parts (ie. intake manifolds and valves) become available.

The flow rolled over gently between .600" and .650" There was no definitive flow drop at a particular lift.

Richard
Old 04-06-2006, 12:05 AM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Deffinatlly disapointed in the exaust port volume/valve size and the lack of flow. Intake looks great. Nice view of how much you can gain by increasing bore as well. Thanks for the results.
Old 04-06-2006, 02:30 AM
  #5  
Closed ex-Sponsor Account
iTrader: (7)
 
StreetnStrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Richard@WCCH
At the moment I have too many projects on the front burner. I'll consider a CNC program when more support parts (ie. intake manifolds and valves) become available.

The flow rolled over gently between .600" and .650" There was no definitive flow drop at a particular lift.

Richard
u the man thanks for doing the flow test.
Old 04-06-2006, 07:49 AM
  #6  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Mizfit MotorSports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks for the test. Great info!
Old 04-06-2006, 08:40 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
TurboGibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

WOW! Those things are going to be in high demand in a few years when some start showing up in junk yards.
Great work!
Old 04-06-2006, 02:19 PM
  #8  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
SuperSporttruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Redondo Beach,CA
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The L-92 intake manifold part # is 12580678, just FYI, I told Richard I would post it.
Old 04-06-2006, 02:28 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
snketr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Is that the truck or holden mainfold #
b/c it's only $144 from GMPartsDirect
Old 04-06-2006, 02:29 PM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
 
BLKWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Loganville, GA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by snketr
Is that the truck or holden mainfold #
b/c it's only $144 from GMPartsDirect
thats the truck manifold number.
Old 04-06-2006, 02:31 PM
  #11  
TECH Veteran
 
BLKWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Loganville, GA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

you can build a full set of heads w/valves and rockers for less than 600$
Old 04-06-2006, 02:55 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

wow.

i hope these show even better gains once ported...
Attached Thumbnails Stock L92 Head Flow Data-l92.jpg  
Old 04-06-2006, 06:26 PM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Damn, man. Just install a 1.60" exhaust valve, blend the throat, and polish the port. Then clean up the intake port with a 120gt flap wheel and you are done!!!! Killer information!!!!
Old 04-06-2006, 10:06 PM
  #14  
Launching!
 
BUYAMERICAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Richard,
Like I said before, the L92 and LS7 heads are all anyone is ever going to need for 370 cid on up. This is going to be great for you to clean them up, maybe even do full turnkey assemblies. There is no doubt it is going to put real pressure on the aftermarket heads considering the price point.
Brent

The Warhawk heads will be for the big number f/i crowd.
Old 04-07-2006, 05:54 AM
  #15  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
ace68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

OH MY GOD, and they are what around 200-300 each brand new.
Old 04-07-2006, 06:34 AM
  #16  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Nate_Taufer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North of Seattle
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ace68
OH MY GOD, and they are what around 200-300 each brand new.
160 a pop from GMPartsdirect.com. They are bare though. You'd need ls7 rockers, rocker stands, valves, springs, retainers, seals, and keepers but that stuff is probably only another 900 bucks.

Nate
Old 04-07-2006, 07:15 AM
  #17  
TECH Veteran
 
BLKWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Loganville, GA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Nate_Taufer
160 a pop from GMPartsdirect.com. They are bare though. You'd need ls7 rockers, rocker stands, valves, springs, retainers, seals, and keepers but that stuff is probably only another 900 bucks.

Nate
i priced out a full set yesterday using the L92 valvetrain....less than 600 total for the set.
Old 04-07-2006, 07:57 AM
  #18  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Nate_Taufer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North of Seattle
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLKWS6
i priced out a full set yesterday using the L92 valvetrain....less than 600 total for the set.
You're still going to need the LS7 rocker set for the heads. Thats 350.

Stock springs are good to what lift? Wouldn't think them to be that high. Maybe .550" max if you're lucky.

Also would probably want stainless valves in high hp applications (what most people would be using these for).

Nate
Old 04-07-2006, 08:33 AM
  #19  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Richard@WCCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Van Nuys, CA
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Yeah, the overall cost will be cheap to setup these heads. Now an intake manifold is all that's needed. I understand that Wegner is working on a carb style aluminum one. I have no idea when they intend to release it.

Richard
Old 04-07-2006, 09:31 AM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nate_Taufer
You're still going to need the LS7 rocker set for the heads. Thats 350.
could you elaborate?

why wont the L92 valvetrain work with L92 heads on a diffrent shortblock??


Quick Reply: Stock L92 Head Flow Data



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 PM.