Dynamometer Results & Comparisons - low number in my maro!! any suggestions




CAMARO SS 2000
10-27-2009, 12:34 AM
hi guys

last week I went to dayno jet for new tunning my camaro ss m6 2000

the mode:
hooker headers longtube
borla kitback
asp pully
ls6 intake
slp lid
ported tb
3 spec kelthch
3.73
tr55 plugs
msd wires plugs

it's made 341 hp 356 tr

and before two years it's made 345hp & 362 tr it was 3.42 and without ported tb,tr55 plugs and wires

what do you think guys is this normal number or there is some porblem with a car ?

thanks


lemons12
10-27-2009, 04:28 AM
I don't think you should worry at all.. Dynos don't tell a whole lot, go to the track.. Especially if these pulls were on different dynos..

Ported TB might be good for 4-5Rwhp, max... The plugs and wires won't show a gain..

I think you are fine.

Slowhawk
10-27-2009, 09:02 AM
The #'s look right to me.Hard to compare #'s that far apart.


PewterScreaminMach
10-27-2009, 09:26 AM
Looks fine to me. The gearing change definitely didn't help you (at least that's the rumour going around) and your other changes were minimal. Not to mention you were dynoed two years apart.

MY99TAWS6
10-27-2009, 10:25 AM
Well don't look too bad don't think .Tuning could still make a 10 or so hp difference depending on what you are doing for afr and timing.
Next logical thing to add would likely be a cam. That with the headers should really pick up the power.You already have done the little stuff,lid, underdrive,ported tb.
Also maybe your valve springs need refreshing now.

Brads LS1 02Z
10-27-2009, 10:51 AM
thats not enought to worry about... could of just been bad gas

Damian
10-27-2009, 11:21 AM
The 3:73's are what lowered your dyno #'s a little bit. The power is still there, just doesn't show on the dyno because of the gearing.

I typically see ~4-7 rwhp loss w/ 3:73's in a 10 bolt, and ~7-12 rwhp loss with 4:10's. But again, it's not an actual HP "loss", it's simply a reading on the dyno.

WSsick
10-27-2009, 12:38 PM
any comment ????

yes. you really suck at spelling. bad. but your numbers are nothing to worry about. hard to compare dynos 2 years apart.

hmorris7000
10-27-2009, 04:09 PM
:Dyes. you really suck at spelling. bad. but your numbers are nothing to worry about. hard to compare dynos 2 years apart.

omg!!!! :funny: I knew it was coming!! :rotflmao:

Johnnystock
10-27-2009, 04:31 PM
Yours numbers are not off at all.

shaolink9
10-27-2009, 04:32 PM
yes. you really suck at spelling. bad. but your numbers are nothing to worry about. hard to compare dynos 2 years apart.

maybe english is not his first language.

CAMARO SS 2000
10-28-2009, 12:42 AM
yes. you really suck at spelling. bad. but your numbers are nothing to worry about. hard to compare dynos 2 years apart.

I deleted reply :huh:

thanks
now I feel ok

LSX Truck
10-28-2009, 01:57 AM
it seems ok... if the plugs are old and u haven't done a service in a while you'll normally lose around 5-10