1 FMF
11-05-2007, 05:34 PM
hoping someone can give me some reasons why,
engine = 2002 181 cid (3.0L) GM (mercruiser marine in a 19' boat).
bore/stroke = 4.00" x 3.60"
CR = 9.3
cam i think (from reliable sources) 204/204 deg @ 0.050", don't remember the centerline #'s.
cranking compression had been 170 psi last year on my gauge which i trust, and was getting 5000 rpm wide open. this is my baseline, and i was happy.
let family member use boat this summer, plug falls out of the pan, ran dry and siezed one rod bearing. pulled motor, had rebuilt by good shop.
had crank turned 0.010,
one new rod- the one that siezed,
4 new pistons
new cam and cam bearings
in addition, had the shop do cylinder head work, they had a flow bench and they cleaned in and around the valves. Also got 3 angle valve job, and the head was shaved just enough to clean it up. If anything I would think this would've helped compression, no?
Have about 3 hours on the engine and it runs great,
but cranking compression test only gets me at best 150psi, on average it's 140psi after 3 puffs. And my wide open rpm's at best are 4800 and it takes 3+ seconds to climb past 4600 to 4800. Prior to rebuild the motor would get right to 4800 no problem and reach 5000 in 1-2 seconds.
So I have fairly good reason to believe i'm not getting as much power as before the rebuild, and best I can tell at this point is because of reduced compression. I can pretty much rule out all other variables: same prop, clean hull, same weight in boat (just me), it's even cool weather now which should help, and I am 100% positive the carb, fuel delivery, and ignition is 100%.
Can I expect better compression #'s in the next 10-20 hours of operation, does anybody have first hand experience with this?
Will rings really seat and seal that much more as the motor breaks-in?
other than that, I can't figure what would cause the apparent loss in compression and the 200 rpm loss at top end. With all the planning going into the rebuild the head work, I would think I'd get the same level of performance right off the bat.
engine = 2002 181 cid (3.0L) GM (mercruiser marine in a 19' boat).
bore/stroke = 4.00" x 3.60"
CR = 9.3
cam i think (from reliable sources) 204/204 deg @ 0.050", don't remember the centerline #'s.
cranking compression had been 170 psi last year on my gauge which i trust, and was getting 5000 rpm wide open. this is my baseline, and i was happy.
let family member use boat this summer, plug falls out of the pan, ran dry and siezed one rod bearing. pulled motor, had rebuilt by good shop.
had crank turned 0.010,
one new rod- the one that siezed,
4 new pistons
new cam and cam bearings
in addition, had the shop do cylinder head work, they had a flow bench and they cleaned in and around the valves. Also got 3 angle valve job, and the head was shaved just enough to clean it up. If anything I would think this would've helped compression, no?
Have about 3 hours on the engine and it runs great,
but cranking compression test only gets me at best 150psi, on average it's 140psi after 3 puffs. And my wide open rpm's at best are 4800 and it takes 3+ seconds to climb past 4600 to 4800. Prior to rebuild the motor would get right to 4800 no problem and reach 5000 in 1-2 seconds.
So I have fairly good reason to believe i'm not getting as much power as before the rebuild, and best I can tell at this point is because of reduced compression. I can pretty much rule out all other variables: same prop, clean hull, same weight in boat (just me), it's even cool weather now which should help, and I am 100% positive the carb, fuel delivery, and ignition is 100%.
Can I expect better compression #'s in the next 10-20 hours of operation, does anybody have first hand experience with this?
Will rings really seat and seal that much more as the motor breaks-in?
other than that, I can't figure what would cause the apparent loss in compression and the 200 rpm loss at top end. With all the planning going into the rebuild the head work, I would think I'd get the same level of performance right off the bat.