Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > SBC-BBC-LT1-LT4 PERFORMANCE > LT1-LT4 Modifications
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-23-2009, 08:34 AM   #41
10 Second Club
1995 Chevrolet Camaro
My Garage
 
quik95lt1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 316
Default more cubes

If your goin boosted I would say the more cubes the better, I would absolutly build the 383, even if the heads are a bit shy of what they should be. With boost the heads don't matter as much as they do with a NA motor. Think about 15 psi of boost in a 4.000"X3.48" Cylinder, now think about 15psi of boost in a 4.040"X3.75" Cylinder and both of those cylinders are being compressed to the same amount. You can fit much more air in the 383 obveously, however under a boost condition its not just an extra 30 cubes of air, it's multiplied because of pressurized air vs. outside air pressure (in a perfect application ie. 100% VE). Thats why the little four cylinder pea shooters can handle like 30lbs with no problem, becuase they're jamming 30psi into a tiny area on a small piston head, we are jamming 15 psi into a massive area with a large piston head surface area. Its basic math!!! For NA motors more cubes + good air flow = more power...........for boosted motors more cubes + Boost = much more power!!!!!
__________________
95 LTx Z28 Quasar Blue
BMR Suspension, Strange Dana 60 w/ 4.56's, AI TFS 215cc CNC Heads, AI SR Cam, QA1 Coil Overs, 385c.i. Callies Magnum, Oliver Billets, SRP Pro Series 13.9:1, Ported Intake, Pro Built Auto's 4l60e MVB Pro Street Trans, 5200 9.5" Vigilante, Self Tuned FAST XFI #3515---10.70 @128.4 Spinning 1.56 60'
06 GTO M6
CAI, Stainless Works Headers, Self Tuned w/EFI Live, B&M Shifter, BMR DB's, Bassani CB 13.13@109.3 on 235/40ZR18 Bridgestones 2.20 60'
quik95lt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 10:02 AM   #42
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 46
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quik95lt1 View Post
If your goin boosted I would say the more cubes the better, I would absolutly build the 383, even if the heads are a bit shy of what they should be. With boost the heads don't matter as much as they do with a NA motor. Think about 15 psi of boost in a 4.000"X3.48" Cylinder, now think about 15psi of boost in a 4.040"X3.75" Cylinder and both of those cylinders are being compressed to the same amount. You can fit much more air in the 383 obveously, however under a boost condition its not just an extra 30 cubes of air, it's multiplied because of pressurized air vs. outside air pressure (in a perfect application ie. 100% VE). Thats why the little four cylinder pea shooters can handle like 30lbs with no problem, becuase they're jamming 30psi into a tiny area on a small piston head, we are jamming 15 psi into a massive area with a large piston head surface area. Its basic math!!! For NA motors more cubes + good air flow = more power...........for boosted motors more cubes + Boost = much more power!!!!!
Nice! Looks like I'm building a 383
__________________
95 Camaro z28, Vortech V1 supercharged with a 5 PSI pulley, LT1, 6 speed manual , Pro 5.0 Short shifter, MagnaFlow exhaust, KYB Shocks, C6 Covette wheels, Eagles F1 GS-D3, etc. I didn't install all these modds so I don't what has been done to the engine. This is not my car, it's my dads (for now .
22lambo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 12:03 PM   #43
11 Second Club
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 11
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 5,592
Default

you can go just as fast in a 355 w stock crank na!
__________________

96 Formula WS6#555, LE2, Speedinc, 355, T56
LE2 H/C/I, Speedinc tuned, LPP, UMI, BMR, Dana S60, Street twin, blah blah blah.......
AChotrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 12:20 PM   #44
Launching!
 
93Z2871805's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 223
Default

There's no replacement for displacement. And with boost your volumetric efficiency will be over 100%, actually closer to 115-120%. My pops 408 BBC sees 96% at 4500 rpm NA, but that's because of the big block heads on a fairly small displacement motor. If he used the same heads/cam on a 496 his volumetric efficiency would probably hit 87% at best.
93Z2871805 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 12:30 PM   #45
TECH Addict
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 11
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 2,056
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AChotrod View Post
you can go just as fast in a 355 w stock crank na!
hes not goin na lol! And it depends on what parts are used. Yes I will agree in most builds a 355 will be plenty, but saying a stock crank 355 will go just is fast is a blanket statement! your m6 350 setup trapped 119. Larrys a4 396 trapped 126. Please enlighten me on your theory!
__________________

2002 Z28, 1SC, A4, 13k mi, Bolted, 3.73's, HSW dry plate w/ Nano.
2000 Buick GS, gutted oe airbox, 3.4 pulley, 3" down pipe w/ stock exhaust, tuned. 13.81@101 dd
2003 Silverado LS x-cab, 5.3, Airaid cai, 3.73's.
kinglt-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 12:38 PM   #46
11 Second Club
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 11
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 5,592
Default

Larrys has alot more done to it and a bigger cam. The car is why more set up than mine and leaves with a 1.4 60ft. Im not sayin a 355 is faster Im just saying you can go low 10s @ 130 Na on a 355, add a blower to that and you could go faster than 90% of 383+ cars
Look at Gizmos 355(stock heads intake and TB) vs Larrys 396 since we are compairing apples to oranges
__________________

96 Formula WS6#555, LE2, Speedinc, 355, T56
LE2 H/C/I, Speedinc tuned, LPP, UMI, BMR, Dana S60, Street twin, blah blah blah.......
AChotrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 12:51 PM   #47
TECH Fanatic
 
myltwon's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 1,725
Send a message via AIM to myltwon Send a message via MSN to myltwon
Default

more cubes aren't a bad thing, no reason a larger motor can't do everything an equally setup smaller cube motor can but with more torque, less rpm, more street manners, less convertor/gear.

not to say a 3.48" stroke motor is bad, they can do AMAZING things as many have proven time and time again. but in the end like with everything in cars it's all about what you want out of it and how much/what you are willing to put in it.
__________________
1994 Trans Am GT A4 - 383, LE custom cam, HPS ported heads/intake, Formato tuned, etc.
myltwon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 12:54 PM   #48
TECH Addict
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 11
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 2,056
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AChotrod View Post
Larrys has alot more done to it and a bigger cam. The car is why more set up than mine and leaves with a 1.4 60ft. Im not sayin a 355 is faster Im just saying you can go low 10s @ 130 Na on a 355, add a blower to that and you could go faster than 90% of 383+ cars
Look at Gizmos 355(stock heads intake and TB) vs Larrys 396 since we are compairing apples to oranges
Your post above said "a stock crank 355 will be just as fast na". now your saying that it's not lol. I understand your point, a well built 355 will haul ass! You have an awsome setup, not tryin to knock it at all. Im sure your setup is faster than my 383 was. My whole thing is, someone thats new reads your post, then they go off runnin thier mouth that a 383+ is a waste of time because a 355 will keep up! See where Im getting at...
__________________

2002 Z28, 1SC, A4, 13k mi, Bolted, 3.73's, HSW dry plate w/ Nano.
2000 Buick GS, gutted oe airbox, 3.4 pulley, 3" down pipe w/ stock exhaust, tuned. 13.81@101 dd
2003 Silverado LS x-cab, 5.3, Airaid cai, 3.73's.
kinglt-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 01:15 PM   #49
11 Second Club
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 11
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 5,592
Default

Im not talking about my car,
Did you see the car in my other thread? Stock crank 355 that runs 10.30s at 131 NA.
and its deffintily not a waste to do a 383+ but unless the kid plans on running crazy fast. Its not nessecary. You Need a serious top end to feed such a big engine and thats alot of the extra cost also to make a bad ass 383.
I like both small and big LTxs but i see guys goin just as fast if not faster with a 355s.
__________________

96 Formula WS6#555, LE2, Speedinc, 355, T56
LE2 H/C/I, Speedinc tuned, LPP, UMI, BMR, Dana S60, Street twin, blah blah blah.......
AChotrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 01:18 PM   #50
10 Second Club
1995 Chevrolet Camaro
My Garage
 
quik95lt1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 316
Default

My experience.....I had a stock crank and rod 355 with 11.2:1, TFS untouched out of the box heads, and a big AI hydraulic roller. The car was set up perfectly and weighed 3500lbs with me in it. I would turn consistent 11.40-11.45's at 120-122 with the car. Now my new 385 has only 9 passes on it and with two burnt plug wires and a bad head gasket (#2 compression bleeding into the coolant system) I ran a 10.80 @128 babying it out of the hole (1.68 60'). If you get a combo right and do your homework, yes a 355 will rip. However if you do your home work on a 383 and build it right you can achieve some really serious numbers/times. Its all about matching your cam/heads/CR/c.i....on and on and on to the rest of the car. But again this is one of the cases where bigger is better.
__________________
95 LTx Z28 Quasar Blue
BMR Suspension, Strange Dana 60 w/ 4.56's, AI TFS 215cc CNC Heads, AI SR Cam, QA1 Coil Overs, 385c.i. Callies Magnum, Oliver Billets, SRP Pro Series 13.9:1, Ported Intake, Pro Built Auto's 4l60e MVB Pro Street Trans, 5200 9.5" Vigilante, Self Tuned FAST XFI #3515---10.70 @128.4 Spinning 1.56 60'
06 GTO M6
CAI, Stainless Works Headers, Self Tuned w/EFI Live, B&M Shifter, BMR DB's, Bassani CB 13.13@109.3 on 235/40ZR18 Bridgestones 2.20 60'
quik95lt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 01:31 PM   #51
11 Second Club
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 11
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 5,592
Default

I totally agree^ about it all being in the matching parts to the motor, if they are matched correctly bigger is better, sad part is most with big motors dont do that.
__________________

96 Formula WS6#555, LE2, Speedinc, 355, T56
LE2 H/C/I, Speedinc tuned, LPP, UMI, BMR, Dana S60, Street twin, blah blah blah.......
AChotrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 01:32 PM   #52
TECH Addict
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 11
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 2,056
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AChotrod View Post
and its deffintily not a waste to do a 383+ but unless the kid plans on running crazy fast. Its not nessecary. You Need a serious top end to feed such a big engine and thats alot of the extra cost also to make a bad ass 383.
I agree ac, but your post before made it sound like a 383 was pointless by saying " a stock crank 355 will keep up na". The problem is most 383+ engines are not maximized. most throw the same parts on a 383 that work on a 355, the only gain is tq at that point.

Op check this link out. This one of the baddest procharged 383 lt1's I have seen. These are two local 10 sec street cars on 17's doin battle! That ls1 he is racin went 10.30 @ 137 on 17" dr's!!!

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/B...28s_187925.htm

search call911 on streetfire and you can see more of his vids.
__________________

2002 Z28, 1SC, A4, 13k mi, Bolted, 3.73's, HSW dry plate w/ Nano.
2000 Buick GS, gutted oe airbox, 3.4 pulley, 3" down pipe w/ stock exhaust, tuned. 13.81@101 dd
2003 Silverado LS x-cab, 5.3, Airaid cai, 3.73's.
kinglt-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 01:38 PM   #53
11 Second Club
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 11
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 5,592
Default

I know who call911 is hes on LTxtech with me
__________________

96 Formula WS6#555, LE2, Speedinc, 355, T56
LE2 H/C/I, Speedinc tuned, LPP, UMI, BMR, Dana S60, Street twin, blah blah blah.......
AChotrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 01:48 PM   #54
TECH Addict
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 11
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 2,056
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AChotrod View Post
I know who call911 is hes on LTxtech with me
If figured you did. I posted the link for the original poster, hince op. Since he is building a boost motor, call911 setup is a great reference on what parts work.
__________________

2002 Z28, 1SC, A4, 13k mi, Bolted, 3.73's, HSW dry plate w/ Nano.
2000 Buick GS, gutted oe airbox, 3.4 pulley, 3" down pipe w/ stock exhaust, tuned. 13.81@101 dd
2003 Silverado LS x-cab, 5.3, Airaid cai, 3.73's.
kinglt-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 02:07 PM   #55
TECH Fanatic
 
myltwon's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 1,725
Send a message via AIM to myltwon Send a message via MSN to myltwon
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AChotrod View Post
Im not talking about my car,
Did you see the car in my other thread? Stock crank 355 that runs 10.30s at 131 NA.
and its deffintily not a waste to do a 383+ but unless the kid plans on running crazy fast. Its not nessecary. You Need a serious top end to feed such a big engine and thats alot of the extra cost also to make a bad ass 383.
I like both small and big LTxs but i see guys goin just as fast if not faster with a 355s.
you also have to remember though that sometimes a bigger motor isn't just for max effort but also more cubes will, like I previously said, increase streetability as more cubes tend to "eat cams" like better operating range, less required rpm, better street manners, etc and the complementing parts (valvetrain, stall, gear, etc) need not be as radical/aggreesive to acheive a similar goal. valvetrain stability and ability along with balancing, though always important no matter what the cubic inch, will always be a greater concern with the more required rpm forced upon it. basically the higher you spin it the more weak links that will be exposed and stress will be forced upon them.

so a larger motor can be dual purpose in reality such as a tamer street machine or a more "max effort" build to squeeze out all available power.
__________________
1994 Trans Am GT A4 - 383, LE custom cam, HPS ported heads/intake, Formato tuned, etc.

Last edited by myltwon; 09-23-2009 at 02:12 PM..
myltwon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 02:16 PM   #56
ADM
TECH Enthusiast
 
ADM's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 585
Default

I wanted to go 355, but I could not justify the cost of the machining and all the parts for it just for 5 cubic inches. Thats why I stuck to 350.
__________________
Just another LT1
ADM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 02:19 PM   #57
TECH Fanatic
 
myltwon's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 1,725
Send a message via AIM to myltwon Send a message via MSN to myltwon
Default

well the main point of a 355 is a clean up bore, and larger selection of aftermarket pistons. last I checked aftermarket for 4.030" bore stock stroke pistons greatly outweighed that of 4.000" bore pistons as far as upgrades go. along with the increased cylinder volume of course.

did you upgrade the pistons while you were doing your build or did you reuse stockers?
__________________
1994 Trans Am GT A4 - 383, LE custom cam, HPS ported heads/intake, Formato tuned, etc.
myltwon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 02:20 PM   #58
TECH Fanatic
 
djjab57's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 13
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Crosby, TX 77532
Posts: 1,674
Send a message via MSN to djjab57
Default

355 Guys are kooler.....................
__________________
1994 Z28 A4
www.fquick.com/djjab57

For sale NIB GM Oil sending unit (back of intake) $35 shipped fits late 94's - 97

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1 Craz28 View Post
And I heard adding an aluminum flywheel was like putting a 75shot of nitrous on it?
djjab57 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 02:35 PM   #59
ADM
TECH Enthusiast
 
ADM's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by myltwon View Post
well the main point of a 355 is a clean up bore, and larger selection of aftermarket pistons. last I checked aftermarket for 4.030" bore stock stroke pistons greatly outweighed that of 4.000" bore pistons as far as upgrades go. along with the increased cylinder volume of course.

did you upgrade the pistons while you were doing your build or did you reuse stockers?
I didn't take the engine apart, just the heads were removed during the cam swap.

I did originally want to go 355 forged to spray but I changed my mind.

I am saving up for my next engine hoping to have something rather special. Like I mentioned in other threads before, I have my mind set on that Dart 427 LTx motor if it ever goes into production.
__________________
Just another LT1
ADM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 02:39 PM   #60
TECH Fanatic
 
myltwon's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 1,725
Send a message via AIM to myltwon Send a message via MSN to myltwon
Default

ahhhhh I thought you were deciding during a rebuild, nevermind then
__________________
1994 Trans Am GT A4 - 383, LE custom cam, HPS ported heads/intake, Formato tuned, etc.
myltwon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 PM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS