Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > SBC-BBC-LT1-LT4 PERFORMANCE > LT1-LT4 Modifications
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-27-2009, 10:47 PM   #21
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 88
Default

can someone please give me a part number on some scorpion 1.6 nsa and sa
__________________
vegasfbody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 12:12 AM   #22
Staging Lane
 
stevo9389's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 84
Default

what lift ratio are you looking for and do you need 3/8 or 7/16 studs?
stevo9389 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 11:35 AM   #23
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 88
Default

i dont know my car is pretty much stock like i said before i will be camming it but nothing big the the brightest when it comes to specs of stuff more a body guy my self as for the studs 3/8 as thats stock right?
__________________
vegasfbody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 12:37 PM   #24
TECH Fanatic
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 1,042
Default

3/8 is stock is yes.

I say go 7/16's.

1) Because studs are cheap

2) Because it doesnt change the cost of the rocker arm much, if at all usually.

3) Because valvetrain ridgidity is always a good thing regardless of the level of the build.

4) If you buy a quality lifetime-warrantied rocker, you can use them on a possible future build that would "need" them.
__________________
-'94 Z-28 M6 AZSM Headers, Custom XFI Baby Cam, Borla
4:10's, Built T-56, MT ET Streets, UD Pulleys, LT4 KM, SLP Lid
TPIS FPR, Dynaspark, N20 Outlet Plate Kit

12.75 Best ET | 112.96 Best MPH | 1.91 Best 60' | 5800ft Elev

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrd1972
That head aint worth shit. Your valves are not even straight.
gregrob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 01:32 PM   #25
TECH Fanatic
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 11
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,917
Default

^agreed! Buy something you can use down the road. Sa rockers are for bolton cars only imo. Nsa rockers w/ 7/16 studs should be mandatory for heads/ cam setups. If you can afford it, get the comp high tech stainless. This rocker will most likely outlive the car.
__________________

2002 Z28, 1sc, A4, SLP lid, 1.85 rockers, jantzer ptb, hooker LT's w/ ory, cb exhaust, shift kit, 3.73's. times to come...
2000 Buick GS, gutted oe airbox, 3.4 pulley, 3" down pipe w/ stock exhaust, full tune. 13.81@101.2
2003 Silverado LS x-cab, 5.3, Airaid cai, 3.73's.
kinglt-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 02:00 PM   #26
Staging Lane
 
stevo9389's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 84
Default

go here: http://www.flatlanderracing.com/scor...s.html#chevySB
you will need to click on small block chevy and it will give you part numbers for all the ratios for 3/8 and 7/16. unless you have had the heads worked to accomodate a higher lift i would not go over 1.5 ratio. you can go 1.6, i have seen it done, but depending on whom you speak with the stock springs (even on a stock cam) are being maxed out or dangerously close if you go with 1.6.
stevo9389 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 02:26 PM   #27
TECH Fanatic
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 11
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,917
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo9389 View Post
go here: http://www.flatlanderracing.com/scor...s.html#chevySB
you will need to click on small block chevy and it will give you part numbers for all the ratios for 3/8 and 7/16. unless you have had the heads worked to accomodate a higher lift i would not go over 1.5 ratio. you can go 1.6, i have seen it done, but depending on whom you speak with the stock springs (even on a stock cam) are being maxed out or dangerously close if you go with 1.6.
Right, but he is planning on installing a cam, read his last post. Most guys run nsa 1.6's with 7/16 studs and guideplates cammed. Yes the springs will need to be replaced.
__________________

2002 Z28, 1sc, A4, SLP lid, 1.85 rockers, jantzer ptb, hooker LT's w/ ory, cb exhaust, shift kit, 3.73's. times to come...
2000 Buick GS, gutted oe airbox, 3.4 pulley, 3" down pipe w/ stock exhaust, full tune. 13.81@101.2
2003 Silverado LS x-cab, 5.3, Airaid cai, 3.73's.
kinglt-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 02:33 PM   #28
TECH Regular
 
BLWNLT1_T/A's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 9
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 408
Default

I got springs CC Springs and CC puchrods NIB I let go for 100.00 Shipped.

I bought some TFS heads and wont need them. Also got some ls7 lifters which in my case require a slightly longer pushrod.
__________________
<a href=http://www.freeimagehosting.net/ target=_blank><a href=http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/84f914ec31.jpg target=_blank>http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/84f914ec31.jpg</a></a>
BLWNLT1_T/A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 02:35 PM   #29
Staging Lane
 
stevo9389's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 84
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kinglt-1 View Post
Right, but he is planning on installing a cam, read his last post. Most guys run nsa 1.6's with 7/16 studs and guideplates cammed. Yes the springs will need to be replaced.
i read his last post i just dont understand the relevance of you pointing that out. i wanted to leave nothing to assumption that he knew about the springs.
stevo9389 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 05:34 PM   #30
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 88
Default

so should i go with 1.5s cause im gonna be building my race motor on the side im going to keep this motor a very super streetable motor nothing crazy
__________________
vegasfbody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 05:40 PM   #31
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 88
Default

ok so i have decided like posted above that the motor i have now is gonna stay mostly all bolt ons and im going to be building a 383 on the side for now i want a set of rollers rockers for the bolt on motor so 1.5 3/8 good idea?
__________________
vegasfbody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 05:48 PM   #32
TECH Fanatic
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 11
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,917
Default

no because you will have to sell those and buy nsa 7/16 for the 383. Buy the right rockers the first time imo. Get a set of 7/16 nsa 1.6's w/ upgraded springs now and transplant them onto your 383 when it's built.
__________________

2002 Z28, 1sc, A4, SLP lid, 1.85 rockers, jantzer ptb, hooker LT's w/ ory, cb exhaust, shift kit, 3.73's. times to come...
2000 Buick GS, gutted oe airbox, 3.4 pulley, 3" down pipe w/ stock exhaust, full tune. 13.81@101.2
2003 Silverado LS x-cab, 5.3, Airaid cai, 3.73's.
kinglt-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 06:09 PM   #33
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 88
Default

well im building an entirely diffrent motor on the side the motor in the car will stay how it is minus some things but the new motor will be w whole diffrent block (dart block) so im building a street motor and a whole diffrent race motor on the side so for the bolt on street motor good to go with the 1.5s?
__________________
vegasfbody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 09:06 PM   #34
TECH Fanatic
 
myltwon's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 1,675
Send a message via AIM to myltwon Send a message via MSN to myltwon
Default

I run 3/8 SA rockers on my 383...then again I make peak power around 6k
__________________
1994 Trans Am GT A4 - 383, LE custom cam, HPS ported heads/intake, Formato tuned, etc.
myltwon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 11:35 PM   #35
Staging Lane
 
stevo9389's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 84
Default

1.5s are fine because they are the stock ratio anyway. if you dont plan on using them for another build then it might not be a great investment. 1.6s would have a greater resale value if/when you part out the current motor.
stevo9389 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 01:27 AM   #36
On The Tree
 
93Z2871805's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 186
Default

Procomp has some shaft mount rockers for like 242.99(alum) 264.99(steel) from jegs. PN 2342 for aluminum and 2347 for steel 1.6 ratio.
93Z2871805 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 01:01 PM   #37
TECH Fanatic
1996 Chevrolet Camaro
 
96lt1m6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 27
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LA$ VEGA$
Posts: 1,991
Default

for the money spent 1.5 rr would serve no benefit at all, atleast 1.6s will give more power for the same money!
__________________
Rudy 13.35@105/exploded clutch http://videos.streetfire.net/video/2...ric_700654.htm

www.lvcfo.org
96lt1m6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 01:09 PM   #38
On The Tree
 
CARFREAKS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 110
Send a message via Yahoo to CARFREAKS
Default

I agree go with a 1.6 or dont do it at all...
__________________
1994 Z-28 switching to a 427 LS7X full Global West suspension 10pt cage Visage body kit, SS hood, commander spoiler,with custom house of Kolors paint.

1995 z-28 383 lt4 hot cam ARP main studs,JE Forged pistons, H-Beam rods,Eagle crank, ported to match heads and intake. 58mTB 36lb injectors,Long tube headers, Custome tune.K&N CAI MSD Blaster coil, Msd optispark, Msd wires Lightly built trans, Monster 2,300-2,500 stall,150 wet Nos
http://www.carfreaksvideos.com/Videos.html
CARFREAKS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 01:35 PM   #39
TECH Fanatic
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 11
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,917
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vegasfbody View Post
well im building an entirely diffrent motor on the side the motor in the car will stay how it is minus some things but the new motor will be w whole diffrent block (dart block) so im building a street motor and a whole diffrent race motor on the side so for the bolt on street motor good to go with the 1.5s?
Why spend the money on a set of 1.5 roller rockers? The stockers will do the same thing on the stock cam. There is no significant gain, unless you increase the rocker ratio to get more valve lift, hince 1.6! Spend the money on 1.6's with atleast an ls6 spring(cheap), or don't do it at all imo.
__________________

2002 Z28, 1sc, A4, SLP lid, 1.85 rockers, jantzer ptb, hooker LT's w/ ory, cb exhaust, shift kit, 3.73's. times to come...
2000 Buick GS, gutted oe airbox, 3.4 pulley, 3" down pipe w/ stock exhaust, full tune. 13.81@101.2
2003 Silverado LS x-cab, 5.3, Airaid cai, 3.73's.
kinglt-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 01:44 PM   #40
11 Second Club
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 10
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 4,864
Default

Sounds like a waste of money to me if your building a 383.
Why not buy something once and just switch it over when you do the swap. I recommend the Comp High Tech Stainless rockers as well. Also 1.5s are a complete waste of money on either set up IMO.
__________________

LE2, Speedinc, Bedroom built 355, T56
LE2 H/C/I, Speedinc tuned, LPP, UMI, BMR, Dana S60, Street twin, blah blah blah.......
2nd place EX NA at LTXshootout
AChotrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
15, 185, 32, 383, agressif, engines, ls, nsa, put, rocker, rockers, roller, rr, sho, steel, train, valve


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS