LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

93 to 94-97 lt1 differences

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2010 | 07:55 PM
  #1  
linkziz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default 93 to 94-97 lt1 differences

I have a lt1 out of a 93 ta it has the 700r4. Im putting it into my 95 camaro. Im new to the lt1 and just looking for the difference between 93 and up lt1s. I know 93 has the body mounted air pump the 700r4 and the fuel rail crossover is in the back and the 93s dont have the air line that goes across the front of the engine, but i also heard the 93s are batch fire is that true? I would really like to know the differences in the optispark and if its possible to swap a vented newer one on. Also since its a 93 auto it has a tv cable so what throttle bodies work on this engine? My camaro is for the track only so im not worried about the air pump or egr their blocked off since the headers have to fittings.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 06:18 AM
  #2  
jaysz2893's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 203
Likes: 1
From: Townsend, DE
Default

93's are speed density not MAF. they are batch fire. The ECM uses a "Chip". The Opti is specific for 1993 and late 1994 IIRC. It has a small spline shaft that drives it not a pin like the other models and is non vented. You can convert them to vented or go with a MSD unit like I did. Conversion to a OEM Vented opti will require a new cam, timing cover, and the opti itself.
I cant tell you about the TB cause my car is a manual and i was able to bolt on a BBK 52mm. I know the Fuel Pressure Regulator is specific to 1993. I just put one in. check out speeddensity.org. There is a lot of 1993 specific info there.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 11:03 AM
  #3  
01ssreda4's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 89
From: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Default

Would this work in the earlier non-vented LT1s? It says vented though

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...MakeTrack=true
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 12:04 PM
  #4  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 8
From: South Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
Would this work in the earlier non-vented LT1s? It says vented though

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...MakeTrack=true
It would, but by no means should anyone purchase it. OEM is the best, hands down. If you're looking for an optispark on eBay, look for "thepartsladi" and pick up the real deal.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 08:29 PM
  #5  
linkziz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

Thank you
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 08:54 PM
  #6  
1badzee's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,011
Likes: 0
From: SFL
Default

Throttle bodies are the same, just different IAC's and the cable bracket is different. The 93's have a provision for the throttle valve cable (auto's only).
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2011 | 07:43 PM
  #7  
sempire's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 386
Likes: 1
Default

Couldn't you just mod a 94 TB with 93 parts so that it works?
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2011 | 07:52 PM
  #8  
jester1614's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: west phx
Default

oil pressure sending unit on 93's are located above the oil filter (on some 94s and on all later years they are on the rear china wall)

93's oil pressure unit are also a different part number as well (shorter)
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2011 | 08:03 PM
  #9  
sempire's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 386
Likes: 1
Default

I was just talking about making a 94 throttle body work on a 93.

You should just be able to swap a few parts from the 93 onto a 94 and should be good, right?
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2011 | 10:29 PM
  #10  
BizZzatch350's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,793
Likes: 15
From: T E X A S
Default

Originally Posted by sempire

You should just be able to swap a few parts from the 93 onto a 94 and should be good, right?
ROTFLMAO, Fck No, ok, maybe if it's a six speed.

So is this an auto or six speed car? The 93 LT1s had the old style "screw in" IAC where they have a threaded opening on the IAC plate and it screws in to it. The 94+ LT1s they went to bolt in style, so the IAC actually just bolts the plate rather then screwing in to it, which I think is a little nicer. So.... unless those few parts include the correct IAC plate OR you have the later style pig tail and convert over to the 94+ IAC, then your o.k. I never did it but you can wire the newer style pig tail in to your 93s harness. So if you have a six speed car, change the IAC and your good to go, it'll work just fine. But if the cars an auto, it won't work at all because it doesn't have the hook up for the shift detent cable (Kick Down, TV).

Last edited by BizZzatch350; Apr 14, 2011 at 10:34 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 12:14 AM
  #11  
93Z2871805's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 50
Default

Welcome to the wonderful world of Speed Density. On the bright side, the intake manifolds for the 92-93 LT1s is considered to be the best as far as flow due to the cross over being behind the manifold and not creating an obstruction right behind the TB opening.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 08:08 AM
  #12  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 8
From: South Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by 93Z2871805
Welcome to the wonderful world of Speed Density. On the bright side, the intake manifolds for the 92-93 LT1s is considered to be the best as far as flow due to the cross over being behind the manifold and not creating an obstruction right behind the TB opening.
Have you visually compared a 93 intake to a 94+?
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 AM.