Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > WEBSITE ACTIVITY FORUMS > Racer's Lounge
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

View Poll Results: Which LOOKS better?
Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 108 58.06%
Chevrolet Trailblazer SS 78 41.94%
Voters: 186. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-11-2009, 02:18 PM   #41
Launching!
2000 Pontiac Trans Am
 
BlackonBlackTA's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 283
Default

srt8 looks badass
__________________
2000 TA A4 2.73
SLP Cold Air Flowpack SLP Loudmouth II Dual/Dual tips
Instead of mods: Water pump, rear main, alternator.
BlackonBlackTA is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 04:20 PM   #42
TECH Veteran
 
mycamaroSS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Marcos/Plano, Texas
Posts: 4,891
Default

srt 8 my best friends got one and Im in love
__________________

2001 Camaro SS #1752: ???rwhp ???tq- LS6 Intake l LS6 Heads l ORY l JetHot Sterling Coated Pacesetter LT Headers l Cut-Out l SLP Lid l Brembo Rotors
mycamaroSS is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 09:24 PM   #43
TECH Enthusiast
 
Trader Rating: 7
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 717
Default

The jeep is bad ass






Quote:
Originally Posted by Superman09 View Post
Strictly based on looks here. Which of the two vehicles do you think looks better.

Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8



Chevrolet Trailblazer SS

madmike9396 is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 09:36 PM   #44
TECH Junkie
1998 Pontiac Trans Am
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 17
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 3,828
Default

jeep hands down
__________________

00 Pewter T/A A4 - Full Weight DD - 7.40@91.7mph NA 2400DA Enough to bitch slap Ls1killer!
00 Onyx Black T/A A4 (girlfriends car) - 8.4@85.5mph NA 2400DA Converter in! New times coming!
98 Artic White T/A A4 - DD - SOLD - 7.20@95.7mph NA 2000DA spinning/no tune
Past Rides- 02 954RR, 02 F4i, 98 Z28 M6, 99 3.8 V6 Firebird, 95 3.4 V6 Camaro
lemons12 is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 09:40 PM   #45
Banned
1992 Lexus SC
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Santa Monica, California
Posts: 315
Default

Actually that silver trailblazer looks like shit too me..

I would now definetely take the Jeep for sure....

Anybody test drive both? I would love to hear about how they both drive and feel..
JIBBBY is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 09:41 PM   #46
TECH Junkie
1998 Pontiac Trans Am
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 17
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 3,828
Default

TBSS looks like a family type slow SUV..

the SRT8 looks freaking bad ass..
__________________

00 Pewter T/A A4 - Full Weight DD - 7.40@91.7mph NA 2400DA Enough to bitch slap Ls1killer!
00 Onyx Black T/A A4 (girlfriends car) - 8.4@85.5mph NA 2400DA Converter in! New times coming!
98 Artic White T/A A4 - DD - SOLD - 7.20@95.7mph NA 2000DA spinning/no tune
Past Rides- 02 954RR, 02 F4i, 98 Z28 M6, 99 3.8 V6 Firebird, 95 3.4 V6 Camaro
lemons12 is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 10:49 PM   #47
Teching In
 
sandovalt1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chase Park, TX
Posts: 35
Default

I would say the srt-8, but the tb ss looks sick lowered
__________________

95 LT1 355, th400 swap, 4500 yank.
sandovalt1 is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 10:52 PM   #48
12 Second Club
 
BLK85's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 977
Send a message via MSN to BLK85
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JIBBBY View Post
Anybody test drive both? I would love to hear about how they both drive and feel..
I have.

Performance wise the Jeep is way faster from a stand still. I was with the owner of the Jeep while he did a few hard launches and it pushes you back in the seat. I also did a few hard launches in the TBSS. It launches pretty good but near as hard as the Jeep. I think the Jeep accelerates faster too after the launch too. I only took the TBSS up to 80, the Jeep to 100.

The ride is a little harsher in the Jeep, not not very noticeably and both were driven on different roads so it is hard to really compare. The seats in the TBSS are probably very slightly more comfortable but not by much. And I like the fact that the Jeeps seats hold you in place more, kind of what I look for in a sport type vehicle even if its a truck.

The Jeep feels like you sit higher than in the TBSS. This is really a non issue for me. It wouldnt sell me on either one. The interior of the Jeep looks a lot better. But the TBSS only had the basic stereo whereas the Jeep had the Nav. But from what I can see in pictures I think the Jeeps nav and base stereo looks better, specs wise I dont know which is better. Regardless the interior looks a lot better in the Jeep.

Jeeps have a kick ass Blue tooth set up from what I have heard. That would be really nice for talking on the phone while driving. I dont think the TBSSes ever had this option.

Those are the main parts that I can think of right off hand. Both were 2006s, the TBSS was an AWD version.
__________________
My Fquick Page
2005 Ninja 636 12.10 @ 118mph with a 2.2 60ft-Current Toy
1998 Pontiac Firebird Formula M6 12.36@112mph with a 1.76 60ft-Sold
BLK85 is offline  
Old 02-12-2009, 12:17 AM   #49
Teching In
 
my06tbssson's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: PEARLAND TX
Posts: 15
Send a message via Yahoo to my06tbssson
Default

tbss ftmfw
__________________
EST 2007
my06tbssson is offline  
Old 02-12-2009, 10:15 AM   #50
Banned
1992 Lexus SC
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Santa Monica, California
Posts: 315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BLK85 View Post
I have.

Performance wise the Jeep is way faster from a stand still. I was with the owner of the Jeep while he did a few hard launches and it pushes you back in the seat. I also did a few hard launches in the TBSS. It launches pretty good but near as hard as the Jeep. I think the Jeep accelerates faster too after the launch too. I only took the TBSS up to 80, the Jeep to 100.

The ride is a little harsher in the Jeep, not not very noticeably and both were driven on different roads so it is hard to really compare. The seats in the TBSS are probably very slightly more comfortable but not by much. And I like the fact that the Jeeps seats hold you in place more, kind of what I look for in a sport type vehicle even if its a truck.

The Jeep feels like you sit higher than in the TBSS. This is really a non issue for me. It wouldnt sell me on either one. The interior of the Jeep looks a lot better. But the TBSS only had the basic stereo whereas the Jeep had the Nav. But from what I can see in pictures I think the Jeeps nav and base stereo looks better, specs wise I dont know which is better. Regardless the interior looks a lot better in the Jeep.

Jeeps have a kick ass Blue tooth set up from what I have heard. That would be really nice for talking on the phone while driving. I dont think the TBSSes ever had this option.

Those are the main parts that I can think of right off hand. Both were 2006s, the TBSS was an AWD version.
Thanks man, that basically confirms that I would choose the Jeep over the TBSS... I sat and looked over the Jeep and it's a little boxy looking but does look kinda fat... If it hauls and is comfortable and looks ok what more do you want in a new SUV?
JIBBBY is offline  
Old 02-12-2009, 12:26 PM   #51
10 Second Club
 
Cobra Commander's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 12
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 277
Default

The Jeep. The SS wheels suck. Yeah the Jeep is faster is also a few k more MSRP iirc.
__________________
1999 Trans Am
416 LS3 | APS Extreme Performance kit | 90/90 | Trick Flow 225s | Circle D multi disk | 4L80E | Moser 12 bolt
Cobra Commander is offline  
Old 02-12-2009, 01:12 PM   #52
TECH Enthusiast
1994 Chevrolet Camaro
 
riceburnerZ28's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 6
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Plano, IL
Posts: 631
Send a message via Yahoo to riceburnerZ28
Default

Srt-8 for the win !
__________________
94 Z28 M6: Scat forged rods,Eagle crank,306 cam,Magnum RR's,Comp's 986 springs,UMI Sfc's,Lca's & Brackets,LG T.A,STB,Kyb shocks,Derale oil cooler,Mallory Ignition, Custom CAI,BBK Headers,ORY,Hooker Catback,SVO Injectors,Walbro Fuel pump,Tuned by MadTuner.com
"I don't have V-Tec, but I do have the "fukumupbad" setting on the boost controller!"
riceburnerZ28 is offline  
Old 02-12-2009, 01:34 PM   #53
Banned
1992 Lexus SC
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Santa Monica, California
Posts: 315
Default

Which ones are easier and less expensive to modify and have the most potential? Maybe the Chevy, no?
JIBBBY is offline  
Old 02-12-2009, 01:47 PM   #54
TECH Junkie
1998 Pontiac Trans Am
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 17
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 3,828
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JIBBBY View Post
Which ones are easier and less expensive to modify and have the most potential? Maybe the Chevy, no?
i know many people hit mid 12s with them with little to no mods.. i have seen just an intake and tune hit mids. as far as ease and cheapness i dont know..
__________________

00 Pewter T/A A4 - Full Weight DD - 7.40@91.7mph NA 2400DA Enough to bitch slap Ls1killer!
00 Onyx Black T/A A4 (girlfriends car) - 8.4@85.5mph NA 2400DA Converter in! New times coming!
98 Artic White T/A A4 - DD - SOLD - 7.20@95.7mph NA 2000DA spinning/no tune
Past Rides- 02 954RR, 02 F4i, 98 Z28 M6, 99 3.8 V6 Firebird, 95 3.4 V6 Camaro
lemons12 is offline  
Old 02-12-2009, 01:50 PM   #55
On The Tree
 
MIDNITE Z's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 136
Default

Chevrolet Trailblazer SS
__________________
1998 Metalic Blue Chevy Camaro Z28

MIDNITE Z is offline  
Old 02-12-2009, 02:21 PM   #56
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North County, San Diego
Posts: 2
Default

I test drove both and didn't really understand the point of the SRT-8 Jeep. Why not just get another SRT-8 vehicle? The Jeep is supposed to be a Sport Utility Vehicle yet it really doesn't have the Utility (can't tow, small back seat, and rides rougher than an EVO).The TBSS is a fast SUV the Jeep SRT-8 is more like a fast car thats lifted.

Also, at the time the Jeep was like 15K more than the TBSS and it was smaller, got worse gas mileage, and wasn't that much faster stock for stock. Now, mod for mod is never really a fair comparison but both the vehicles have been out for awile now and the fastest TBSS is running low 9's while the jeeps seem to be stuck in the high 10's so I think speed wise the TBSS seems to have an edge if your gonna be modding it.
DASinc. is offline  
Old 02-12-2009, 02:33 PM   #57
TECH Junkie
1998 Pontiac Trans Am
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 17
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 3,828
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DASinc. View Post
I test drove both and didn't really understand the point of the SRT-8 Jeep. Why not just get another SRT-8 vehicle? The Jeep is supposed to be a Sport Utility Vehicle yet it really doesn't have the Utility (can't tow, small back seat, and rides rougher than an EVO).The TBSS is a fast SUV the Jeep SRT-8 is more like a fast car thats lifted.

Also, at the time the Jeep was like 15K more than the TBSS and it was smaller, got worse gas mileage, and wasn't that much faster stock for stock. Now, mod for mod is never really a fair comparison but both the vehicles have been out for awile now and the fastest TBSS is running low 9's while the jeeps seem to be stuck in the high 10's so I think speed wise the TBSS seems to have an edge if your gonna be modding it.
the srt is faster.. i consider it an suv... if nothing else because of the appearance... it would still piss off somebody that lines up next to them by getting beat by an SUV..
__________________

00 Pewter T/A A4 - Full Weight DD - 7.40@91.7mph NA 2400DA Enough to bitch slap Ls1killer!
00 Onyx Black T/A A4 (girlfriends car) - 8.4@85.5mph NA 2400DA Converter in! New times coming!
98 Artic White T/A A4 - DD - SOLD - 7.20@95.7mph NA 2000DA spinning/no tune
Past Rides- 02 954RR, 02 F4i, 98 Z28 M6, 99 3.8 V6 Firebird, 95 3.4 V6 Camaro
lemons12 is offline  
Old 02-12-2009, 06:16 PM   #58
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North County, San Diego
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemons12 View Post
the srt is faster.. i consider it an suv... if nothing else because of the appearance... it would still piss off somebody that lines up next to them by getting beat by an SUV..
Yes, stock for stock the SRT-8 is faster. For 10-15K more it sure as shit should be.
DASinc. is offline  
Old 02-12-2009, 06:57 PM   #59
Banned
1992 Lexus SC
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Santa Monica, California
Posts: 315
Default

It sounds like the Jeep is more of sportscar type SUV that is obviously more expensive in every way, sticker price and modifying... The Chevy though is a bit cheaper new, almost as fast stock for stock, bigger and we all know we can mod that Chevy motor...

It's sounds like pound for pound the TBSS Chevy could be the smarter choice financially... The Jeep seems to look a little better though...WOW, this is realy a tough call????
JIBBBY is offline  
Old 02-12-2009, 09:29 PM   #60
12 Second Club
 
BLK85's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 977
Send a message via MSN to BLK85
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JIBBBY View Post
It sounds like the Jeep is more of sportscar type SUV that is obviously more expensive in every way, sticker price and modifying... The Chevy though is a bit cheaper new, almost as fast stock for stock, bigger and we all know we can mod that Chevy motor...

It's sounds like pound for pound the TBSS Chevy could be the smarter choice financially... The Jeep seems to look a little better though...WOW, this is realy a tough call????
I really think your wrong on that. You have to remember your getting your info from a mainly GM forum. You have to do a little more research on your own and formulate your own opinion.

Jeep does have stiffer suspension, but I couldnt notice it as a big of a problem as some here say. If you want a nice ride buy an Escalade. I would never buy anything new(change my mind to much) new they really arent that much different. Maybe 3k tops, Im talking the 3SS AWD TBSS and the Jeep. According to Cars.com they are 3k different new in 07. Used I cant find much of a difference either.

Moding wise I think they are very similar with probably the edge going to the Jeep until you get really fast(like 10.50 and below). They make a lot for the Jeeps too.

After all the research I have done plus driving both I think I have made up my mind.
__________________
My Fquick Page
2005 Ninja 636 12.10 @ 118mph with a 2.2 60ft-Current Toy
1998 Pontiac Firebird Formula M6 12.36@112mph with a 1.76 60ft-Sold
BLK85 is offline  
Closed Thread

Tags
14, 6m, brace, cams, coilovers, jeep, mile, pictures, srt8, ss, stock, suspension, tbss, tower, trailblazer


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 AM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS