Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

PRC Street $849 Heads DYNO RESULTS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 02:12 PM
  #1  
Jon@Texas-Speed's Avatar
Thread Starter
FormerVendor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 2
From: Lubbock, TX
Default PRC Street $849 Heads DYNO RESULTS

Ok guys here's what Joseph's Z28 adding just the Street Precision Race Components LS6 heads.


What you have to notice is it's not only hp she's gaining, it's huge torque as well! The setup makes more torque than the stock heads at the start of the pull!! 2500rpm & already making more torque!!

Pretty hard to beat for the $$$!!
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 02:20 PM
  #2  
gomer's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
From: The Confederacy
Default

What cam is he running?
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 02:24 PM
  #3  
Jon@Texas-Speed's Avatar
Thread Starter
FormerVendor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 2
From: Lubbock, TX
Default

235/240 112
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 02:36 PM
  #4  
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 4
From: Texas!
Default

Car just picked up to 430@400 with a little lean out
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 03:03 PM
  #5  
BAIN's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

Are the heads milled any?
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 03:08 PM
  #6  
Ben01C5's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Seoul, Korea
Default

Do you have the full list of mods for his car?
I totally think my headers, and sotck cats are killing my power numbers.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 04:08 PM
  #7  
-Joseph-'s Avatar
LSxGuy widda 9sec Mustang
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
From: Texas and Qatar
Default

My mods are in the sig. I also have been running a Hooker Y-pipe and TSP Rumbler Catback (for both dyno's) the last couple of months which isn't as good as my true duals were. I havn't bought a pulley yet, and I'm thinking of going with a MS3 next so there is a little more left.

Heads/Cam is about as far as I planned to go with this car as far as engine mods, so for once in my life I'm almost done modding something.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 04:27 PM
  #8  
styles2769's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Cape Coral, FL.
Default

what dyno was that?????
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 04:30 PM
  #9  
Brandon Boomhauer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,766
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Denton TX
Default

I'm pretty sure that was on a dynojet.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 04:33 PM
  #10  
-Joseph-'s Avatar
LSxGuy widda 9sec Mustang
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
From: Texas and Qatar
Default

Its an in-ground Dynojet Model 248C.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #11  
styles2769's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Cape Coral, FL.
Default

seems like good overall numbers for a cam like that.....what do you think those heads would pull with full bolt-on and a 231/237 cam
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 07:12 PM
  #12  
cbrtrx's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Default

good results but were the new heads milled at all or thinner head gasket, were the runs done the same day and are they sae corrected, and what was the air fuel ratio and timing on both of the heads and finally was there a reason the runs stopped at 6200rpm's with the new heads, sorry for all the questions
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 07:31 PM
  #13  
styles2769's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Cape Coral, FL.
Default

would the 2.04's clear with a MS3 cam.....I have been looking for a good set of heads for the cost to go with my MS3 cam I am getting soon
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 09:33 PM
  #14  
-Joseph-'s Avatar
LSxGuy widda 9sec Mustang
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
From: Texas and Qatar
Default

Originally Posted by cbrtrx
good results but were the new heads milled at all or thinner head gasket, were the runs done the same day and are they sae corrected, and what was the air fuel ratio and timing on both of the heads and finally was there a reason the runs stopped at 6200rpm's with the new heads, sorry for all the questions
N/P on the questions:

They were milled .003" for cleanup and to make sure there was a flat surface - just like all heads PRC does. I'm running .051" Cometic gaskets, the same that I had with the stock heads. I had to replace some lifters 3 weeks ago, so I prepared the car for this upcoming head swap with the Cometics and ARP Head Bolts to save time on cleanup, and in torque procedures. It worked as this swap took 4 hours.

The Cam-only pull was yesterday after work, about 7pm, I finished the swap at midnight and did the dyno pulls this morning after I arrived at work, about 11am. I believe the cam-only setup was 13.3 a/f at the tailpipe, and after heads was 12.9, at the motor it would be .5 richer if we were testing there.
Not sure what Jason finally tuned it for as I was in a rush after lunch and didn't check.

The pull was ended at 6600, but I had a spark plug wire start cutting out up top, so the graph shifts down. After replacing the wires with MSD's, it picked up a little more and didn't cut out. The last pull we did today was 430rwhp and 400rwtq, we always use SAE.

I'm pretty happy with this setup, especially for the price - everything I bought was economical other than the splurge for coated headers.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 09:43 PM
  #15  
TroubledWine3's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Default

Damn that is awesome. One question though, these heads are a little bit more than $850 with springs that will support a 235/240 cam, aren't they?
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 09:55 PM
  #16  
-Joseph-'s Avatar
LSxGuy widda 9sec Mustang
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
From: Texas and Qatar
Default

Originally Posted by TroubledWine3
Damn that is awesome. One question though, these heads are a little bit more than $850 with springs that will support a 235/240 cam, aren't they?
I forgot to mention that I have PRC doubles on mine now. My stock heads had Comp Cams 918's with a ton of miles. I had other plans for the 918's or I might have reused them.

The PRC LS6 heads come with new valves, seals, retainers, locks, and stock '02+ LS6 "yellow" valvesprings for no charge (~.560" lift capacity). The valves are not sodium filled, and are similiar to what the C5 and GTO LS2 engines have.

Single Comp 918 Beehive spring upgrade is $150.
PRC Double Spring upgrade kit is $250.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 09:57 PM
  #17  
Ksett's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ben01C5
Do you have the full list of mods for his car?
I totally think my headers, and sotck cats are killing my power numbers.
Those chrome wheels are not dyno friendly either. I have the same wheels on my Z06 and when I added them it felt like I lost 20rwhp. I would have to guess I lost a minimum of 10rwhp although it feels like more.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 11:55 PM
  #18  
The Sad's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Default

That is a nice improvement for a nice price.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 12:14 AM
  #19  
98SuperSport's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis
Default

do you guys have a custom grind cam to match these heads perfectly or is that 235/240 112lsa close?
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 12:32 AM
  #20  
70Stang's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Default

Would these heads work with your 233/239 on a 112?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 PM.