Attn: STS owners and supporters
#1
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 5,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Attn: STS owners and supporters
Take a peak at my numbers now with a d1 at 10 psi, lets just say in theroy I was approached with an sts kit with a big fat turbo on it at 10-12psi as well. Would my numbers be the same or higher. This will also be with a front mount yada yada yada
PS. This is just fictional
PS. This is just fictional
#3
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 5,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Forged block
230/234 .598/ 602 lift on 114
Patriot 72 cc heads
Felpro head gaskets
studs
LSX intake 78mm
fuel
Walbro 340l intank -single
-8 feed to Nasty fuel rail's
Aeromotive regulator set at 52 PSI -line off
-6 return
60lb Motrons
M6 through Denny Nitrous shaft and 9" rear 3.70 gears
Feed by an ATI D1 4.00 pulley - Standard 8rib harmonic side(comes with 8 rib kit)Dual bypass valves
230/234 .598/ 602 lift on 114
Patriot 72 cc heads
Felpro head gaskets
studs
LSX intake 78mm
fuel
Walbro 340l intank -single
-8 feed to Nasty fuel rail's
Aeromotive regulator set at 52 PSI -line off
-6 return
60lb Motrons
M6 through Denny Nitrous shaft and 9" rear 3.70 gears
Feed by an ATI D1 4.00 pulley - Standard 8rib harmonic side(comes with 8 rib kit)Dual bypass valves
#6
TECH Addict
do you have your dyno sheet?
we can dyno race when I am done.
I will be running 10psi with my setup.
Mods beyond the turbo and fuel system are cleaned up stock heads and a baby blower cam from my blower days. 212/218 .522/.529 114
Would at least be interesting to compare. I had a 500rwhp ATI setup that I sold to buy the STS so I will at least be able to give my butt dyno impression between the 2 as well.
we can dyno race when I am done.
I will be running 10psi with my setup.
Mods beyond the turbo and fuel system are cleaned up stock heads and a baby blower cam from my blower days. 212/218 .522/.529 114
Would at least be interesting to compare. I had a 500rwhp ATI setup that I sold to buy the STS so I will at least be able to give my butt dyno impression between the 2 as well.
#7
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 5,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by White_Hawk
I don't think you would ever lose a race to an STS car with that setup - unless he was hitting it with a 200 shot.
-Geoff
-Geoff
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 5,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blackbird
do you have your dyno sheet?
we can dyno race when I am done.
I will be running 10psi with my setup.
Mods beyond the turbo and fuel system are cleaned up stock heads and a baby blower cam from my blower days. 212/218 .522/.529 114
Would at least be interesting to compare. I had a 500rwhp ATI setup that I sold to buy the STS so I will at least be able to give my butt dyno impression between the 2 as well.
we can dyno race when I am done.
I will be running 10psi with my setup.
Mods beyond the turbo and fuel system are cleaned up stock heads and a baby blower cam from my blower days. 212/218 .522/.529 114
Would at least be interesting to compare. I had a 500rwhp ATI setup that I sold to buy the STS so I will at least be able to give my butt dyno impression between the 2 as well.
#9
Tell me more about your twin bypass valves. I have a D1-SC with twin coolers and was going to get a second bypass installed. Have been having some turbulence issues through the MAF and the poosible fix is twin bypass valves. Let me know.
#10
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 5,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 01SCSS
Tell me more about your twin bypass valves. I have a D1-SC with twin coolers and was going to get a second bypass installed. Have been having some turbulence issues through the MAF and the poosible fix is twin bypass valves. Let me know.
#11
Launching!
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Wallingford, CT
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're already down that road, so I think it would be easier to just upgrade the blower and replace the intercooler.
The STS would be a downgrade for you.
If you really want a turbo, get a big single next to the engine.
I would be really curious to see how you would do against me in a roll. I have 520lb-ft. You would beat me, but I'd like to see how badly. I should have asked you when I was at Dez's a few months ago.
The STS would be a downgrade for you.
If you really want a turbo, get a big single next to the engine.
I would be really curious to see how you would do against me in a roll. I have 520lb-ft. You would beat me, but I'd like to see how badly. I should have asked you when I was at Dez's a few months ago.
#12
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 5,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark C
You're already down that road, so I think it would be easier to just upgrade the blower and replace the intercooler.
The STS would be a downgrade for you.
If you really want a turbo, get a big single next to the engine.
I would be really curious to see how you would do against me in a roll. I have 520lb-ft. You would beat me, but I'd like to see how badly. I should have asked you when I was at Dez's a few months ago.
The STS would be a downgrade for you.
If you really want a turbo, get a big single next to the engine.
I would be really curious to see how you would do against me in a roll. I have 520lb-ft. You would beat me, but I'd like to see how badly. I should have asked you when I was at Dez's a few months ago.
I have raced a few 600 hp turbo cars, I won without much issue but whenever you would like to go from a roll feel free, Im sure I wouldnt beat you by much, your car makes awesome power and was the best sleeper I have seen. I wouldnt run the the norm sts, I will be running a much larger garret turbo. well if I did it anyway. This would be for fun and testing, I would still have the SC if I didnt like it.
#14
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 5,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NA$TY-TA
I would like to see this also........ did you ever find out the diameter of the the stock ATI crank pulley??? I want to see how fast you are spinning the blower.
Kyle
Kyle
#15
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Roanoke Va
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am having tuning problems with my car. My car is pulling timing down after 3700 to 11 degrees due to a map sensor issue but up to that point my dyno numbers are just a little bit higher than yours at only 5lbs of boost. I think my numbers will fall short of yours in the long run but it is strong up until that point. So far my car pulled 455/450 at only 11 degrees of timing and 5 pounds.
#16
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 5,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2ktransam
I am having tuning problems with my car. My car is pulling timing down after 3700 to 11 degrees due to a map sensor issue but up to that point my dyno numbers are just a little bit higher than yours at only 5lbs of boost. I think my numbers will fall short of yours in the long run but it is strong up until that point. So far my car pulled 455/450 at only 11 degrees of timing and 5 pounds.
#17
Tenured Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Our number are in the sig. The LS1 is all stock motor besides forged pistons, rods and stainless valves. The dyno was at about 12 psi with a slipping converter which we just fixed up this weekend.
#18
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Roanoke Va
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 5-liter-eater
I make 630 rwhp right now? Im confused
#19
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
Originally Posted by 2ktransam
I did not mean that my total numbers were better than yours only that I was making better power up to 3700 rpms according to our dyno graphs. I will fall well short of your peak numbers even after I get my tuning problem straightened out. I think I will end up in the 500 rwhp and 530 rwtq range which I think is pretty good for only 5 pounds of boost on a stock bottom end. Maybe someday I will make your kind of power but it will probably be a while. Good luck with your project.
#20
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 5,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2ktransam
I did not mean that my total numbers were better than yours only that I was making better power up to 3700 rpms according to our dyno graphs. I will fall well short of your peak numbers even after I get my tuning problem straightened out. I think I will end up in the 500 rwhp and 530 rwtq range which I think is pretty good for only 5 pounds of boost on a stock bottom end. Maybe someday I will make your kind of power but it will probably be a while. Good luck with your project.