Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Torque coming out of my EARS! (cam change)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2006, 10:39 PM
  #1  
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default Torque coming out of my EARS! (cam change)

I've been experimenting again!

As many of you know, I ran the first Thunder Racing TRak Cam to great success. The cam specs are 233/235 .644/.598 112LSA (+2). This is a very mean cam and a bit of a bear to tune, but the effort was worth it. Made the numbers in my signature. The TRak cam is bigger than its numbers will lead you to believe.

About a month ago, I had an opportunity to try out a Comp XE-R lobed cam: 234/238 .598/.605 114LSA (+2). This cam had much better street manners than the TRak cam and was within 5 rwhp in the 6000+ rpm range, but was down about 20 lb ft of torque in the 3000-4000 rpm mid-range. I wanted my torque back.

Since I liked the street manners of the 114LSA cam, but I wanted lots more torque, I asked Thunder Racing to grind me up a Super Torquey cam that would have excellent street manners. Here's what they came up with:
224/228 .637/.639 110LSA (+0).

I'm absolutely in love with this cam. It feels like I picked up 50 lb ft of torque in the 2000-4000rpm range over the 234/238 114LSA cam.

Here's why: My dynamic compression has risen from 8.34:1 to 8:73:1! We even saw a huge increase in cranking compression. The 234/238 114LSA cam had 200psi and the new Torque cam has 245psi! Holy smokes!! No wonder my throttle response is instantaneous.

This cam proves that you can have a 110LSA cam and still have excellent street manners and the .637/.639" lift will really compliment my high flowing AFR 225 heads. I will spend this week tweaking my speed density tune, then I hope to go to Houston and put it on the rollers! Torque, Torque, Torque!!

New sig.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Last edited by Patrick G; 04-02-2006 at 10:50 PM.
Old 04-02-2006, 10:45 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Grimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Humm, very interested in how your numbers pan out. I assume that this are the LSK lobes you mentioned in the other thread? I want a really nice torquey cam as well; however if I go with a quality dual spring package, how long will they last with the crazy *** lift these lobes are going to? (drive my car 100 miles/ day)

Hurry up and grab those numbers for us!
Old 04-02-2006, 10:48 PM
  #3  
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Results so far indicate that the LSK lobes will be no harder on springs than XE-R lobes when set up properly. Shimming the springs to within .050" of coil bind will help them rev and help them last. I daily drive my LSK cammed car...1000-1500 miles per month.
Old 04-02-2006, 10:50 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
 
Ben R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Why the obsession with torque? Horsepower is what matters.
Old 04-02-2006, 10:55 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Nice to know. Looks like the diffrent exaust lobes didn't really make much diffrence on the T-rak? I've wondered latley if using a diffrent exaust lobe was neccasary. I've searched far and wide to find an exaust lobe to meet the specifacations I was looking for to match my 243 LSK intake lobe, but I'm wondering if I should have just stuck with a LSK exaust lobe and been done.
Old 04-02-2006, 10:56 PM
  #6  
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ben R
Why the obsession with torque? Horsepower is what matters.
Because I had to wait until 5000 rpm before my car really started to take off. Now it bolts forward at 2000 rpm. I do not expect to lose much if any power upstairs. So basically I've maximized the area under the curve by chosing valve events that best compliment the AFR heads and the runner length of the FAST 90/90 intake. The big duration wide LSA combination was a poor combination in my car. It was lazy. Basically a dog off the line.

To maximize the area under the curve within the architecture of our intakes and heads, it's a smart idea to work intake valve closing points and dynamic compression to your best advantage.

And to sum up what you quoted, yes HP is what matters. Since I have LOTS more toque between 2000-4000 rpm, that also means I have LOTS more horsepower in that range!
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 04-02-2006, 11:10 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
00cls1camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,659
Received 31 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

you have a dyno graph
Old 04-02-2006, 11:12 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
vader99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

With respect to this experiment, if you took a TR 224 224 563 563 112 +4 cam and changed it to a 110 +4 would you experience more lowend torque as well?
Old 04-02-2006, 11:14 PM
  #9  
TECH Regular
 
TopFlite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 415 Northern CA
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Good stuff Patrick. How much total timing are you running?
Old 04-02-2006, 11:17 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Grimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
Results so far indicate that the LSK lobes will be no harder on springs than XE-R lobes when set up properly. Shimming the springs to within .050" of coil bind will help them rev and help them last. I daily drive my LSK cammed car...1000-1500 miles per month.

Ah, good to know. What springs are you using with them? prc duals; patriot duals; 921's?

ps. i do know that they probably all come from the same factory, just wondering.
Old 04-02-2006, 11:18 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Congrats Pat...

I know you are pumped about it... look forward to more details. Hitting the combo on the head makes all the research and calculations worth the time...

Old 04-02-2006, 11:27 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
HOSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

good luck with the new setup man...thanks for your help again
Old 04-03-2006, 12:01 AM
  #13  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
ThirdGenLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yea awsome work, lets hope when i call Geoff tomorrow he can help me out with picking somthing good for my set up.

Justin
Old 04-03-2006, 12:10 AM
  #14  
CNB
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
CNB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: DFW
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm anxious to see the results.
Old 04-03-2006, 12:28 AM
  #15  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
CAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Damn Patrick, way to go on the cam choice and research. I love my new EDC cam, would be snappier with a smaller stall or taller gears, but oh well. Will be interested in the dyno, but waiting for track results.
Old 04-03-2006, 12:42 AM
  #16  
Dom
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

How hard does that cam lope? I also can't wait for the results. I would love a powerfull street cam with a nice top end for the track. This is primary why I was going to go with a 228/228 since I'm not looking for records just a powerful daily street car. I might go with a 110 if you get good results. Make sure to get some sound clips.
Old 04-03-2006, 01:38 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
SUTTERERMAN85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Fort Worth
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

very interested....sweet....
Old 04-03-2006, 07:03 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

How would the XE-R lobes compare to the LSK with a cam of same specs. What would be the effect accross the rpms.?
In short, if you had a XE-R cam with same specs, how would it compare in the power range.??
Old 04-03-2006, 07:55 AM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
cantdrv65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXASS
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Post

This is exactly why I love my 228/228 XER lobed cam....I still believe too many people are overcamming stock cubed cars currently.... Im anxious to see your actual dyno results as well.
Old 04-03-2006, 09:13 AM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Wow, you got that in fast.

Glad that has fixed the low end blues.


Quick Reply: Torque coming out of my EARS! (cam change)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 PM.