498.46rwhp and 462.77rwtq tune ONLY zo6
05-12-2006, 11:47 PM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Las Vegas Nv.
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
498.46rwhp and 462.77rwtq tune ONLY zo6 This is a bone stock car tune only!Thanks to the guys from NRP!!!
All of the runs were made at 200 degrees on the temp gauge no cool downs or funny business, it was run like it would be run on the street.
This is a 2006 z06 with 1012 miles on it.
Steve
All of the runs were made at 200 degrees on the temp gauge no cool downs or funny business, it was run like it would be run on the street.
This is a 2006 z06 with 1012 miles on it.
Steve
05-13-2006, 12:00 AM
#3
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: searching for the perfect driving line
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Great numbers!! Did you get any baseline numbers before tune? Are these corrected numbers? I assume this was on a dynojet and not a mustang dyno. Sorry for all the questions but with all the new options out there now, I'm grabbing all the info I can. Sure you heard this before but that's a fat ride also, enjoy it!
98 Z28 M6 mods: not enough to mention
98 Z28 M6 mods: not enough to mention
05-13-2006, 09:13 AM
#4
Staging Lane
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ramair96ws6
This is a bone stock car tune only!Thanks to the guys from NRP!!!
All of the runs were made at 200 degrees on the temp gauge no cool downs or funny business, it was run like it would be run on the street.
This is a 2006 z06 with 1012 miles on it.
Steve
All of the runs were made at 200 degrees on the temp gauge no cool downs or funny business, it was run like it would be run on the street.
This is a 2006 z06 with 1012 miles on it.
Steve
Trending Topics
05-14-2006, 01:46 PM
#11
On The Tree
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NOSjohn
I agree, numbers look skewed IMO. The 50rwhp from just a tune...gotta be the best tuner in the world...and then some. 
05-14-2006, 01:55 PM
#12
Banned
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The correction alone shows that the #'s are skewed. There is something up on the dyno hardware stacks weather readings causing way to much correction. Plus its in standard correction which will give higher #'s than SAE.
05-14-2006, 10:56 PM
#14
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Las Vegas Nv.
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I went and talked to the Dyno owner and he showed me the correction factors that were used and they are correct I live in Las Vegas Nv. We are at 2100 feet and the corrected DA for that day was about 5700 feet. here is a calculator I found online and used just for todays measuremnets of in-hg and Da and here it is. http://wahiduddin.net/calc/calc_da.htm
here is my zip code 89031 and here is the zip of the Dyno shop 89191
plug in the numbers and have a look for yourself. Here are the numbers for the car in SAE and the baseline numbers for that car.
The owner said that if you dont belive these numbers are real he will fly you to his shop and personally show you the car, the dyno, and what ever else you would like to see on his dime. roundtrip.
here is the dyno sheet.
here is my zip code 89031 and here is the zip of the Dyno shop 89191
plug in the numbers and have a look for yourself. Here are the numbers for the car in SAE and the baseline numbers for that car.
The owner said that if you dont belive these numbers are real he will fly you to his shop and personally show you the car, the dyno, and what ever else you would like to see on his dime. roundtrip.
here is the dyno sheet.
05-14-2006, 11:52 PM
#16
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Albuquerque NM - The Land of 8000ft DA
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Correction factor or not it's just a linear mulitiplication factor.
The actual value doesn't mean much, STD or SAE, but the difference before and after does matter.
The actual value doesn't mean much, STD or SAE, but the difference before and after does matter.
05-15-2006, 12:03 AM
#17
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: College Station/Pasadena
Posts: 8,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by John B
.....you won't find a 27.83 barometer reading on this planet (maybe in the eye of a hurricane!)
thats where i dyno my car dont you
05-15-2006, 01:13 AM
#18
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Las Vegas Nv.
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ai...ure-d_461.html
The standard for 2000ft altitude is 27.82 in-hg so I don't see how the hurricane statement is relevant
website for reference http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ai...ure-d_461.html
The standard values for pressure, temperature and density (ignoring the slight effect of humidity) at altitudes from sea level to 16,000 feet (about 4900 m).
Altitude
(feet) Pressure
(in. Hg) Temp.
(F) Density
(%)
Altitude
(feet) Pressure (in. Hg)Temp. (F) Density (%)
sea level 29.92 59.0 100
2,000 27.82 51.9 94.3
4,000 25.84 44.7 88.8
6,000 23.98 37.6 83.6
8,000 22.22 30.5 78.6
10,000 20.57 23.3 73.8
12,000 19.02 16.2 69.3
14,000 17.57 9.1 65.0
16,000 16.21 1.9 60.9
1 ft (foot) = 0.3048 m
1 in mercury (Hg) = 3,376.8 N/m2 (Pa)= 0.49 lb/in2 (psi) = 12.8 in water
The standard for 2000ft altitude is 27.82 in-hg so I don't see how the hurricane statement is relevant
website for reference http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ai...ure-d_461.html
The standard values for pressure, temperature and density (ignoring the slight effect of humidity) at altitudes from sea level to 16,000 feet (about 4900 m).
Altitude
(feet) Pressure
(in. Hg) Temp.
(F) Density
(%)
Altitude
(feet) Pressure (in. Hg)Temp. (F) Density (%)
sea level 29.92 59.0 100
2,000 27.82 51.9 94.3
4,000 25.84 44.7 88.8
6,000 23.98 37.6 83.6
8,000 22.22 30.5 78.6
10,000 20.57 23.3 73.8
12,000 19.02 16.2 69.3
14,000 17.57 9.1 65.0
16,000 16.21 1.9 60.9
1 ft (foot) = 0.3048 m
1 in mercury (Hg) = 3,376.8 N/m2 (Pa)= 0.49 lb/in2 (psi) = 12.8 in water
05-15-2006, 11:06 AM
#20
Originally Posted by Greg Fell
Shoot I'll take a free trip out there! Sign me up.
Sweet me too, I love vegas ... when are we going?
In the second graph, the 'before' number was done 2-3 months ago and 15 degrees cooler, but the atmospheric pressure happens to be identical?