Click here to visit LS1Tech
Click here to visit Performance Trucks
Click here to visit Mod Motor Tech
Click here to visit Modern Hemi
LS1Tech Wiki

LS1TECH  

Go Back   LS1TECH > SBC-BBC-LT1-LT4 PERFORMANCE > Small Block & Big Block Chevy Specific
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into LS1Tech.com, click logo to login  

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-16-2009, 11:16 PM   #1
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12
Default LT1 heads on old small block

what needs to be done to make these work with a carb and old fashion small block?
jh_shady01 is offline  
Old 09-16-2009, 11:25 PM   #2
In-Zane Moderator
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 3,103
Default

More than it would be to get a set of heads that are meant for the small block.
__________________

BUILT NOT BOUGHT
www.fquick.com/zones89rs
Quote:
Originally Posted by JUICED96Z View Post
The weight argument it stupid, compare a Warhawk LS motor to a all aluminum BBC, the weight difference is worth it to me with the kazillion more cubes.
ZONES89RS is offline  
Old 09-18-2009, 06:48 PM   #3
TECH Resident
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 818
Default

Too much work. LTx heads are reverse flow which would have to be fixed ($200+) and the only carb intake that bolts up to LTx heads is the GMPP dual plane intake unless you want to pay for a single plane to be coverted ($250). You would be better off getting a set of cheap aftermarket heads or something used.
ulakovic22 is offline  
Old 09-18-2009, 09:04 PM   #4
TECH Junkie
 
slick1851's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CHITOWN
Posts: 3,270
Send a message via AIM to slick1851
Default

you do understand lt1 guys convert to sbc topends.
slick1851 is offline  
Old 09-19-2009, 02:24 AM   #5
In-Zane Moderator
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 3,103
Default

Yep, for a reason.
__________________

BUILT NOT BOUGHT
www.fquick.com/zones89rs
Quote:
Originally Posted by JUICED96Z View Post
The weight argument it stupid, compare a Warhawk LS motor to a all aluminum BBC, the weight difference is worth it to me with the kazillion more cubes.
ZONES89RS is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 12:42 AM   #6
On The Tree
 
93Z2871805's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 186
Default

The vortec iron heads are very similar. Professional products also makes a great set of heads for under $400 and the hurricane intake.
93Z2871805 is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 12:51 PM   #7
In-Zane Moderator
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 3,103
Default

Are you talking about the pro comp heads? Junk.
__________________

BUILT NOT BOUGHT
www.fquick.com/zones89rs
Quote:
Originally Posted by JUICED96Z View Post
The weight argument it stupid, compare a Warhawk LS motor to a all aluminum BBC, the weight difference is worth it to me with the kazillion more cubes.
ZONES89RS is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 01:17 PM   #8
TECH Resident
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 818
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slick1851 View Post
you do understand lt1 guys convert to sbc topends.
I think that is because some guys don't want to shell out the money for the larger heads out there for the LTx.
ulakovic22 is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 01:30 PM   #9
In-Zane Moderator
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 3,103
Default

For some, but the tons of aftermarket for the SBC shadows the LTx market my 50 fold.
__________________

BUILT NOT BOUGHT
www.fquick.com/zones89rs
Quote:
Originally Posted by JUICED96Z View Post
The weight argument it stupid, compare a Warhawk LS motor to a all aluminum BBC, the weight difference is worth it to me with the kazillion more cubes.
ZONES89RS is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 04:15 PM   #10
TECH Resident
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 818
Default

Definitely, I don't disagree. I just think people move to SBC because they see a cheap price tag but don't include conversion costs or time/effort to make it work.
ulakovic22 is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 04:25 PM   #11
TECH Veteran
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 71
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 4,054
Default

most of the real sbc stuff is killer compared to any ltx crap.
it makes more sense to stick to conventional sbc topend, the jr. intake for starters will anihilate any chopped up ltx manifold.
and the dist. will never have any issues like the opti. etc. etc.
__________________
LS1 SS
LoneStar1nnovationSS
NemeSS is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 05:49 PM   #12
TECH Resident
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 818
Default

I don't agree with most of what you said. Both heads are 23* and the only difference is the reverse cooling. Unless you are talking about 15* or 18* stuff the LTx heads hold their own just fine. AFR's, Dart's, TFS, etc all make nice LTx castings that perform just as well. It's been proven that single plane conversions don't net any real gains over the LTx manifold in any useable RPM range. I think that there were gains above 6500, but most people don't spend a lot of their time up there anyway. The dist. setup is better than the opti, it's more reliable at high RPM and with voltage going through it, but the opti is WAY more accurate than a std dist. and can be made to work really well esp if you pull the high side out of it.
ulakovic22 is offline  
Old 09-22-2009, 07:42 PM   #13
TECH Veteran
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 71
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 4,054
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ulakovic22 View Post
I don't agree with most of what you said. Both heads are 23* and the only difference is the reverse cooling. Unless you are talking about 15* or 18* stuff the LTx heads hold their own just fine. AFR's, Dart's, TFS, etc all make nice LTx castings that perform just as well. It's been proven that single plane conversions don't net any real gains over the LTx manifold in any useable RPM range. I think that there were gains above 6500, but most people don't spend a lot of their time up there anyway. The dist. setup is better than the opti, it's more reliable at high RPM and with voltage going through it, but the opti is WAY more accurate than a std dist. and can be made to work really well esp if you pull the high side out of it.

be that as it may, op is concerned with using lt1 heads on a sbc, i doubt he means any hi price tag parts. assuming stock castings.
unless he got em for free and has access to a machine shop and has the skill to weld and fabricate. dont see the reason to fit them to his sbc.

i for one had no problem driving around with 260cfm sbc heads and vic jr. with a 750 demon on the street or the hiway.
all that single plane bottom end, top end bs is a myth and magazine propaganda.
scr and dcr and camshaft valve events are what make up throttle response. and acceleration.along wih correctly matched drivetrain components
i turn 6500-7k race day and with pump. ignition calbration with timing light. no misfires or breaking up.
__________________
LS1 SS
LoneStar1nnovationSS
NemeSS is offline  
Old 09-23-2009, 10:14 AM   #14
TECH Resident
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 818
Default

We are on two different pages obviously. I already said it was too much work and not worth it in post #3. Everything after was based on someone saying that LTx people are switching from LTx heads to SBC heads because SBC is so much better, which is what I don't agree with.
ulakovic22 is offline  
Old 09-23-2009, 07:23 PM   #15
In-Zane Moderator
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 5
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 3,103
Default

Well, there are SBC heads that are way better than any LTx head out there, but the aftermarket made it that way. 50+ years of the SBC and counting VS 6 years of the flunky LTx.
__________________

BUILT NOT BOUGHT
www.fquick.com/zones89rs
Quote:
Originally Posted by JUICED96Z View Post
The weight argument it stupid, compare a Warhawk LS motor to a all aluminum BBC, the weight difference is worth it to me with the kazillion more cubes.
ZONES89RS is offline  
Old 09-24-2009, 10:33 PM   #16
TECH Regular
 
slow95z's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 32
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dublin Ga
Posts: 490
Send a message via AIM to slow95z Send a message via MSN to slow95z
Default

the only real advantage of the lt1 is the intake system over a gen1 sbc. the heads are not any better on the lt1 is why people swap to sbc heads and convert them to work on the lt1s. you can buy and convert a better flowing set of heads than you can buy lesser flowing heads made for a ltx style engine.
__________________
Blah, this car is a money pit
slow95z is offline  
Old 09-27-2009, 07:17 PM   #17
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Katy, Tx
Posts: 25
Default

Just swap to Vortecs. Basically the same port (maybe even better) and on your typical originally 8.5:1 compression small block they will make about 10:1 with a thin head gasket. Perfect with premium fuel and a mild cam even though they are iron. The combustion chamber design helps with detonation.
wheeliE-maxx is offline  
Closed Thread

Tags
big, block, cool, engine, fit, head, heads, lt1, motor, older, reverse, sbc, small, weight, work


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 AM.

LS1TECH - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - JOBS