NEW CAMARO! Lets hear what you got.
My reply was on this comment:
Originally Posted by ethan071891
A 5th gen will not out run a 4th gen with equal mods, been there done that.
As for the trap speed, Four different magazines, four different trap times. I bet you here in maryland at 100 ft it hits 112-113 on cool evening. And no ****, a bolt on to a non bolt on, I wouldn't expect anything different. Next time, make sure you comment on the entire post.
Originally Posted by ethan071891
A 5th gen will not out run a 4th gen with equal mods, been there done that.
As for the trap speed, Four different magazines, four different trap times. I bet you here in maryland at 100 ft it hits 112-113 on cool evening. And no ****, a bolt on to a non bolt on, I wouldn't expect anything different. Next time, make sure you comment on the entire post.
Here is the top list over on Camaro5
1. Pave1 - 12.86 @ 107.70 mph, (L99, A6)
2. speedy6963 - 12.87 @ 109.08, (LS3, M6)
3. nhra stocker - 12.92 @ 109.02, (LS3, M6)
4. 8ty8 ls1 - 12.97 @ 107.61 mph, (L99, A6), (DA -433)
5. NineBall - 13.07 @ 109.07 mph, (LS3, M6)
6. Will69camaro - 13.09 @ 109.70 mph (LS3 M6), (DA +276)
7. 8secpumpgas - 13.11 @ 106.38 mph, (L99, A6)
8. Three-D - 13.25 @ 109.84 mph, (LS3, M6)
9. Matt (tunetime) - 13.25 @ 106. 42 mph, (L99, A6)
10. Foglin - 13.28 @ 106.8 mph, (LS3, M6)
11. Scottywheels - 13.28 @ 106.43 mph, (L99, A6)
12. gtwss - 13.29 @ 108.09 mph, (LS3, M6)
13. AntiVnm - 13.30 @ 106. 12 mph (L99, A6)
14. Amwellls1 - 13.31 @ 107.0 mph, (LS3, M6)
15. Midnight camaro - 13.33 @ 105.52 mph, (L99, A6)
16. DarricSS - 13.37 @ 105.89 mph, (LS3, M6), (DA + 3331)
17. HDDAN - 13.38 @ 105.65 mph, (L99, A6)
18. PwrTrip - 13.41 @ 105.01 mph, (L99, A6)
19. Kaler - 13.44 @ 108.64 mph, (L99, A6)
20. SS/RS - 13.54 @ 107.44 mph (LS3, M6), (DA +1187 ft.)
Your flaw is comparing the magazines trap speeds to track trap speeds.
Here is the top list over on Camaro5
1. Pave1 - 12.86 @ 107.70 mph, (L99, A6)
2. speedy6963 - 12.87 @ 109.08, (LS3, M6)
3. nhra stocker - 12.92 @ 109.02, (LS3, M6)
4. 8ty8 ls1 - 12.97 @ 107.61 mph, (L99, A6), (DA -433)
5. NineBall - 13.07 @ 109.07 mph, (LS3, M6)
6. Will69camaro - 13.09 @ 109.70 mph (LS3 M6), (DA +276)
7. 8secpumpgas - 13.11 @ 106.38 mph, (L99, A6)
8. Three-D - 13.25 @ 109.84 mph, (LS3, M6)
9. Matt (tunetime) - 13.25 @ 106. 42 mph, (L99, A6)
10. Foglin - 13.28 @ 106.8 mph, (LS3, M6)
11. Scottywheels - 13.28 @ 106.43 mph, (L99, A6)
12. gtwss - 13.29 @ 108.09 mph, (LS3, M6)
13. AntiVnm - 13.30 @ 106. 12 mph (L99, A6)
14. Amwellls1 - 13.31 @ 107.0 mph, (LS3, M6)
15. Midnight camaro - 13.33 @ 105.52 mph, (L99, A6)
16. DarricSS - 13.37 @ 105.89 mph, (LS3, M6), (DA + 3331)
17. HDDAN - 13.38 @ 105.65 mph, (L99, A6)
18. PwrTrip - 13.41 @ 105.01 mph, (L99, A6)
19. Kaler - 13.44 @ 108.64 mph, (L99, A6)
20. SS/RS - 13.54 @ 107.44 mph (LS3, M6), (DA +1187 ft.)
Here is the top list over on Camaro5
1. Pave1 - 12.86 @ 107.70 mph, (L99, A6)
2. speedy6963 - 12.87 @ 109.08, (LS3, M6)
3. nhra stocker - 12.92 @ 109.02, (LS3, M6)
4. 8ty8 ls1 - 12.97 @ 107.61 mph, (L99, A6), (DA -433)
5. NineBall - 13.07 @ 109.07 mph, (LS3, M6)
6. Will69camaro - 13.09 @ 109.70 mph (LS3 M6), (DA +276)
7. 8secpumpgas - 13.11 @ 106.38 mph, (L99, A6)
8. Three-D - 13.25 @ 109.84 mph, (LS3, M6)
9. Matt (tunetime) - 13.25 @ 106. 42 mph, (L99, A6)
10. Foglin - 13.28 @ 106.8 mph, (LS3, M6)
11. Scottywheels - 13.28 @ 106.43 mph, (L99, A6)
12. gtwss - 13.29 @ 108.09 mph, (LS3, M6)
13. AntiVnm - 13.30 @ 106. 12 mph (L99, A6)
14. Amwellls1 - 13.31 @ 107.0 mph, (LS3, M6)
15. Midnight camaro - 13.33 @ 105.52 mph, (L99, A6)
16. DarricSS - 13.37 @ 105.89 mph, (LS3, M6), (DA + 3331)
17. HDDAN - 13.38 @ 105.65 mph, (L99, A6)
18. PwrTrip - 13.41 @ 105.01 mph, (L99, A6)
19. Kaler - 13.44 @ 108.64 mph, (L99, A6)
20. SS/RS - 13.54 @ 107.44 mph (LS3, M6), (DA +1187 ft.)
I want to see some altitudes and tempature posts. Rofl, one guy trapped 103. Let me guess, you accepted that too?
It reminds of those that say those ls1s trap 108 all the time. which simply isn't true. just as the average is closer to 106.
here's one from texas on this site, 85 degrees.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/2010-cama...camaro-ss.html
edit: P.S make sure you catch the some of the comments from those guys here.
Last edited by wickedwarlock; Nov 3, 2009 at 05:51 PM.
10 Second Club
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 227
From: over dere
My reply was on this comment:
Originally Posted by ethan071891
A 5th gen will not out run a 4th gen with equal mods, been there done that.
As for the trap speed, Four different magazines, four different trap times. I bet you here in maryland at 100 ft it hits 112-113 on cool evening. And no ****, a bolt on to a non bolt on, I wouldn't expect anything different. Next time, make sure you comment on the entire post.
Originally Posted by ethan071891
A 5th gen will not out run a 4th gen with equal mods, been there done that.
As for the trap speed, Four different magazines, four different trap times. I bet you here in maryland at 100 ft it hits 112-113 on cool evening. And no ****, a bolt on to a non bolt on, I wouldn't expect anything different. Next time, make sure you comment on the entire post.
10 Second Club
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 227
From: over dere
I want to see times with drivers who have seat time with the new car. It's been proven time and time again the magazine times post less than at what the track times are here. Lets see if we can get a few from the maryland area to post some times. What you are saying that those top 4 magazines are posting incorrect times?
I want to see some altitudes and tempature posts. Rofl, one guy trapped 103. Let me guess, you accepted that too?
It reminds of those that say those ls1s trap 108 all the time. which simply isn't true. just as the average is closer to 106.
here's one from texas on this site, 85 degrees.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/2010-cama...camaro-ss.html
edit: P.S make sure you catch the some of the comments from those guys here.
I want to see some altitudes and tempature posts. Rofl, one guy trapped 103. Let me guess, you accepted that too?
It reminds of those that say those ls1s trap 108 all the time. which simply isn't true. just as the average is closer to 106.
here's one from texas on this site, 85 degrees.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/2010-cama...camaro-ss.html
edit: P.S make sure you catch the some of the comments from those guys here.
10 Second Club
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 227
From: over dere
Again, go back and read it again. A new camaro will beat the old camaro hands down. Putting the same mods on either car the outcome isn't any different.
10 Second Club
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 227
From: over dere
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?
Pouria Savadkouei
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo 
Here's what ethan posted!Please do explain. They weigh 400 heavier but have 100+ hp. Similar mods they gain usually more power from what I read as someone already posted. Perhaps you are a better driver? perhaps, you got one of the factory freaked 4th gens and he got a slow one?
There's certainly a difference in an average 4th gen trapping 104-108 versus the new camaro trapping 110-112. Even bolt ons on both, I don't see it happening unless he can't drive. If that's the case, hell, makes perfect sense.
There's certainly a difference in an average 4th gen trapping 104-108 versus the new camaro trapping 110-112. Even bolt ons on both, I don't see it happening unless he can't drive. If that's the case, hell, makes perfect sense.Has nothing to do with what I said, comparing mods to both cars.
10 Second Club
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 227
From: over dere
magazine times are showing 110+ at 350da at 80 degrees.
magazine times have been proven wrong time and time again to be lower than the norm. The magazine times had many passes on the car, is why i mentioned seat time on a new car.
These cars trap speeds on average are 3mph different.
10 Second Club
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 227
From: over dere
10 Second Club
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 227
From: over dere
motortrend and probably most of the others used a g-tec on pre production cars. look at the ACTUAL track times posted. oh yeah you ignored those for some reason. you know, the actual track times for the actual cars?
You're speculating now on g-tec. I thought they used gps technology if they didn't use test equipment. I've got magazines here. They are on some track in irvan california. Motortrend and Car and driver even shows test conditions. I see 110.7 and 110.2 on car and driver with 350alt and 76 degrees. Popular mechanics is showing 109 for the auto and 111 for the manual. How am I ignoring them? I said they are not posting tempatures or DA on all of those posts. Than I posted the guy in texas that ran a 109.x in 85 degrees with high humidity. He didn't post DA. I think he posted it during may. I said more seat time on those times you will see improvements on the stock runs posted at that site. They even said they can't wait til it gets cooler to see what the car will do.
10 Second Club
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 227
From: over dere
You're speculating now on g-tec. I thought they used gps technology if they didn't use test equipment. I've got magazines here. They are on some track in irvan california. Motortrend and Car and driver even shows test conditions. I see 110.7 and 110.2 on car and driver with 350alt and 76 degrees. Popular mechanics is showing 109 for the auto and 111 for the manual. How am I ignoring them? I said they are not posting tempatures or DA on all of those posts. Than I posted the guy in texas that ran a 109.x in 85 degrees with high humidity. He didn't post DA. I think he posted it during may. I said more seat time on those times you will see improvements on the stock runs posted at that site. They even said they can't wait til it gets cooler to see what the car will do.
10 Second Club
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 227
From: over dere
You're speculating now on g-tec. I thought they used gps technology if they didn't use test equipment. I've got magazines here. They are on some track in irvan california. Motortrend and Car and driver even shows test conditions. I see 110.7 and 110.2 on car and driver with 350alt and 76 degrees. Popular mechanics is showing 109 for the auto and 111 for the manual. How am I ignoring them? I said they are not posting tempatures or DA on all of those posts. Than I posted the guy in texas that ran a 109.x in 85 degrees with high humidity. He didn't post DA. I think he posted it during may. I said more seat time on those times you will see improvements on the stock runs posted at that site. They even said they can't wait til it gets cooler to see what the car will do.
cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/X-PIPE-OFFROAD-EXHAUST-MUSTANG-HIHP-AWESOMENESS-PAH_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem19b75d3b47QQitemZ11 0450522951QQptZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fruckQ5fPartsQ5fAcces sories
There it is!!!!! GPS timing is NOT equal to the track timing equipment. They come up with trap speeds is two completely different ways. The fact that this guy doesn't know that has me wondering why I am even entertaining his 'all knowing' posts.
Also a big newsflash for you...those magazine times are CORRECTED!!!! They didn't actually trap that high in those horrible conditions.... they were hurt by the heat as much as the next car and those trap speeds are a 'reflection' of what it would have run in 'ideal' conditions.
For holding these magazines as gospel you certainly don't seem to read up on HOW they actually get their results.