C5 rotors with stock LS1 calipers/ abutment brackets
-Jerry
Last edited by SierraCarver; Nov 2, 2009 at 12:11 PM. Reason: title does not reflect question
I want to use the LS1 caliper and C5 rotor with a "track bracket" as well. Do you need the Abutment bracket from the C5 as well... Hopefully someone will confirm that it works.
Considering it works, which "track bracket" would you use?
I think the nicest I've seen are a set on Ebay... machined from solid billet and hard coat anodized. When aluminum is hard coat anodized, a metal file just slides over it. It is pretty amazing... nothing like regular anodizing. they are more than the set that Maryland Speed has, but not much more.
Last edited by DriftR; Nov 3, 2009 at 04:55 PM.
Trending Topics
I too thought about using the larger rotor and keeping the LS1 pads/calipers. I am interested to see the results also.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
This may not be a bad thing as our cars are nose heavy and the rear tires are prone to locking up anyway. This is the reason many who track their car run good pads up front and stock pads on the rear. I can see a C5 rotor only conversion perhaps making it more ideal to run a medium aggressive pad like the Hawk HPS in the rear.
It is an interesting conversion that may actually workout ok. I am interested in doing this swap myself.
I know this has been done before, someone has got to know which abutment brackets and pads (Corvette or Camaro) need to be used with which bracket.......
Some brake performance feedback would be nice too!
The main advantage of the C5 caliper is the fact that it is pressure cast thus being able to better withstand flexing when they get very hot. For a street application the LS1 caliper is fine and actually can apply stronger braking due to the fact that it has larger pistons than the C5's.
The best application depends on your intended use... I hope this clears things up so the thread can get back on topic.
Do I have any experience with them personally no. I should have worded my response better than I did. I do not want to be one of the people that add to internet "hype". But I guess that's what I did. If I can find the thread I will post it.
I had heard it moves the brake bias to the front quite a bit as well, any impressions...
It will move the brake bias to the front, but that is probably not a bad thing on our nose heavy cars. Many people run stock or less aggresive pads in the rear for this very reason. If the bias was too great towards the front you could always run a slightly more aggresive pad in the rear to compensate some. I think it will probably be fine though. Like you I would love to hear actual impressions from those who have driven their car hard (autox, open track, etc.)........
It will move the brake bias to the front, but that is probably not a bad thing on our nose heavy cars. Many people run stock or less aggresive pads in the rear for this very reason. If the bias was too great towards the front you could always run a slightly more aggresive pad in the rear to compensate some. I think it will probably be fine though. Like you I would love to hear actual impressions from those who have driven their car hard (autox, open track, etc.)........
Any other options, 6LE doesnt require cutting but I don't care for the 3 pc design for the reasons in the link above. Saw the same design as 6L's on Ebay... any other options, or anyone with LG brackets they care to part with?








